
09-10-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: WSUS 3.0
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:47:01 +1200, "Harry Johnston [MVP]"
<harry@scms.waikato.ac.nz> wrote:
>Carl Gross wrote:
>
> > How tough is it to install BITS 2.0, dotnet Frameork 2.0 then the WSUS 3.0
> > onto an internal storage disk, not the system disk (D with 25GB instead of C
> > with 12GB)?
>
>BITS and .NET are part of the operating system and can only live on the system
>disk. I don't think you can move the WSUS code either, but the database and the
>content store can be put on the alternate drive.
>
>Note that even 25GB is marginal for WSUS. You'll need to be a bit careful about
>what you approve, and make sure you decline old updates and use the cleanup
And only subscribe to the languages you need.
My WSUS 2.0 content is 3.7GB today but was about 20GB a week ago because the
cleanup job had been failing since I change the password. After running the
cleanup job the content dropped to just under 3GB. The database stays about
1.5GB
>wizard regularly.
>
> Harry.
--
Dave Mills
There are 10 type of people, those that understand binary and those that don't.
|