Service Packs for Framework superceeds RTM

Hi. A sort one.

Does (as an example) .net framework 2.0 SP1 superceeds 2.0?
[same for the others].

I know 2.0 doesn't superceed 1.0 [with or without service packs].

Thanks

Service Packs are service packs. Basically you have Framework 2. Then there are service
packs released. They do not replace the original Framework only update. Hoping that makes
sense.

See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/318785/


--
====================================
TaurArian [MVP] 2005-2008 - Australia
====================================
How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
http://taurarian.mvps.org/index.htm
Emails will not be acknowledged - please post to the newsgroup so all may benefit.


"Gis Bun" <GisBun@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:EED7215C-D7FB-4779-B4EB-720F9D87337E@microsoft.com...
| Hi. A sort one.
|
| Does (as an example) .net framework 2.0 SP1 superceeds 2.0?
| [same for the others].
|
| I know 2.0 doesn't superceed 1.0 [with or without service packs].
|
| Thanks
|
|

Service Packs contain bug fixes (or improvements). Can't have bug fixes for
a products that don't exist.

"Gis Bun" <GisBun@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:EED7215C-D7FB-4779-B4EB-720F9D87337E@microsoft.com...
> Hi. A sort one.
>
> Does (as an example) .net framework 2.0 SP1 superceeds 2.0?
> [same for the others].
>
> I know 2.0 doesn't superceed 1.0 [with or without service packs].
>
> Thanks
>
>

[and to John]

But some times they do incorporate the service pack in a release (as in
Windows Sharepoint Services 3.0 SP1 has it incorporated or separately.
Virtual Server and Virtual PC have full editions with a SP as well).

Isn't it a bit strange that SP1 is around the same size as the RTM?

"TaurArian" wrote:

> Service Packs are service packs. Basically you have Framework 2. Then there are service
> packs released. They do not replace the original Framework only update. Hoping that makes
> sense.
>
> See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/318785/
>
>
> --
> ====================================
> TaurArian [MVP] 2005-2008 - Australia
> ====================================
> How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
> http://taurarian.mvps.org/index.htm
> Emails will not be acknowledged - please post to the newsgroup so all may benefit.
>
>
> "Gis Bun" <GisBun@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:EED7215C-D7FB-4779-B4EB-720F9D87337E@microsoft.com...
> | Hi. A sort one.
> |
> | Does (as an example) .net framework 2.0 SP1 superceeds 2.0?
> | [same for the others].
> |
> | I know 2.0 doesn't superceed 1.0 [with or without service packs].
> |
> | Thanks
> |
> |
>
>
>

"Gis Bun" <GisBun@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:84F15F5E-7980-4D79-9436-A497FC4DDAF1@microsoft.com...
> [and to John]
>
> But some times they do incorporate the service pack in a release (as in
> Windows Sharepoint Services 3.0 SP1 has it incorporated or separately.
> Virtual Server and Virtual PC have full editions with a SP as well).

Sure, why not.

> Isn't it a bit strange that SP1 is around the same size as the RTM?

Not really. It could be smaller if they remove a whole bunch of codes :-)

> "TaurArian" wrote:
>
>> Service Packs are service packs. Basically you have Framework 2. Then
>> there are service
>> packs released. They do not replace the original Framework only update.
>> Hoping that makes
>> sense.
>>
>> See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/318785/
>>
>>
>> --
>> ====================================
>> TaurArian [MVP] 2005-2008 - Australia
>> ====================================
>> How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
>> http://taurarian.mvps.org/index.htm
>> Emails will not be acknowledged - please post to the newsgroup so all may
>> benefit.
>>
>>
>> "Gis Bun" <GisBun@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:EED7215C-D7FB-4779-B4EB-720F9D87337E@microsoft.com...
>> | Hi. A sort one.
>> |
>> | Does (as an example) .net framework 2.0 SP1 superceeds 2.0?
>> | [same for the others].
>> |
>> | I know 2.0 doesn't superceed 1.0 [with or without service packs].
>> |
>> | Thanks
>> |
>> |
>>
>>
>>

"John" wrote:

>
> "Gis Bun" <GisBun@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:84F15F5E-7980-4D79-9436-A497FC4DDAF1@microsoft.com...
> > [and to John]
> >
> > But some times they do incorporate the service pack in a release (as in
> > Windows Sharepoint Services 3.0 SP1 has it incorporated or separately.
> > Virtual Server and Virtual PC have full editions with a SP as well).
>
> Sure, why not.
>
> > Isn't it a bit strange that SP1 is around the same size as the RTM?
>
> Not really. It could be smaller if they remove a whole bunch of codes :-)

Efficient coding? Get real!

I heard of someone analyzing that leaked Win2K source code and was shocked
of the bloatness.

> > "TaurArian" wrote:
> >
> >> Service Packs are service packs. Basically you have Framework 2. Then
> >> there are service
> >> packs released. They do not replace the original Framework only update.
> >> Hoping that makes
> >> sense.
> >>
> >> See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/318785/
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> ====================================
> >> TaurArian [MVP] 2005-2008 - Australia
> >> ====================================
> >> How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
> >> http://taurarian.mvps.org/index.htm
> >> Emails will not be acknowledged - please post to the newsgroup so all may
> >> benefit.
> >>
> >>
> >> "Gis Bun" <GisBun@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:EED7215C-D7FB-4779-B4EB-720F9D87337E@microsoft.com...
> >> | Hi. A sort one.
> >> |
> >> | Does (as an example) .net framework 2.0 SP1 superceeds 2.0?
> >> | [same for the others].
> >> |
> >> | I know 2.0 doesn't superceed 1.0 [with or without service packs].
> >> |
> >> | Thanks
> >> |
> >> |
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>