Trend Micro Anti Virus could not be installed

Hi,

I could not install Trend Micro 7.0 onto Windows Vista. Trend Micro
previously works fine on Windows Xp & Windows 2k.


Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Hong jin

The version of Trend AV that works on Vista is 2007. Are you trying to use
OfficeScan 7.0? It has not been tested or developed or Vista. There are
enough changes under the hood to make it likely that it won't work.

"Hong Jin" wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I could not install Trend Micro 7.0 onto Windows Vista. Trend Micro
> previously works fine on Windows Xp & Windows 2k.
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Hong jin

"Hong Jin" <HongJin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
> Hi,
>
> I could not install Trend Micro 7.0 onto Windows Vista. Trend Micro
> previously works fine on Windows Xp & Windows 2k.

Just because it worked in XP and Win2k doesn't mean it's Vista compatible.
None of the XP AV programs are. Trend has a new Vista compatible version.

--
Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell]

In article <OJYuJ6ZUHHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, in the
microsoft.public.windows.vista.security news group, Rock
<Rock@nospam.net> says...

> None of the XP AV programs are.
>

Not true. eTrust AV works just fine.

--
Paul Adare
MVP - Windows - Virtual Machine
http://www.identit.ca
"The English language, complete with irony, satire, and sarcasm,
has survived for centuries without smileys. Only the new crop of
modern computer geeks finds it impossible to detect a joke that
is not clearly labeled as such."
Ray Shea

"Paul Adare" <padare@newsguy.com> wrote:

> In article <OJYuJ6ZUHHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, in the
> microsoft.public.windows.vista.security news group, Rock
> <Rock@nospam.net> says...
>
>> None of the XP AV programs are.
>>
>
> Not true. eTrust AV works just fine.

The XP version without any changes for Vista worked fine in Vista? I
recollect it didn't.

--
Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell]

It did not. It was updated very early on for Vista because it is what
Microsoft uses internally.

"Rock" wrote:

> "Paul Adare" <padare@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <OJYuJ6ZUHHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, in the
> > microsoft.public.windows.vista.security news group, Rock
> > <Rock@nospam.net> says...
> >
> >> None of the XP AV programs are.
> >>
> >
> > Not true. eTrust AV works just fine.
>
> The XP version without any changes for Vista worked fine in Vista? I
> recollect it didn't.
>
> --
> Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell]
>
>

Trend's corporate versions will not be "Vista" ready until prob
June-ish. They have a beta. PcCillian 2007 is the only Trend version
that supports Vista at this time.

Jesper wrote:
> It did not. It was updated very early on for Vista because it is what
> Microsoft uses internally.
>
> "Rock" wrote:
>
>
>> "Paul Adare" <padare@newsguy.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> In article <OJYuJ6ZUHHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, in the
>>> microsoft.public.windows.vista.security news group, Rock
>>> <Rock@nospam.net> says...
>>>
>>>
>>>> None of the XP AV programs are.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Not true. eTrust AV works just fine.
>>>
>> The XP version without any changes for Vista worked fine in Vista? I
>> recollect it didn't.
>>
>> --
>> Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell]
>>
>>
>>

Is anyone aware of an up-to-date table that lists which AV programs are Vista
ready, and which run on 64-bit? There was a list about a year ago but it has
not been updated for quite some time.

"Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks" wrote:

> Trend's corporate versions will not be "Vista" ready until prob
> June-ish. They have a beta. PcCillian 2007 is the only Trend version
> that supports Vista at this time.
>
> Jesper wrote:
> > It did not. It was updated very early on for Vista because it is what
> > Microsoft uses internally.
> >
> > "Rock" wrote:
> >
> >
> >> "Paul Adare" <padare@newsguy.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> In article <OJYuJ6ZUHHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, in the
> >>> microsoft.public.windows.vista.security news group, Rock
> >>> <Rock@nospam.net> says...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> None of the XP AV programs are.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Not true. eTrust AV works just fine.
> >>>
> >> The XP version without any changes for Vista worked fine in Vista? I
> >> recollect it didn't.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell]
> >>
> >>
> >>
>

Jesper wrote:
> Is anyone aware of an up-to-date table that lists which AV programs are Vista
> ready, and which run on 64-bit? There was a list about a year ago but it has
> not been updated for quite some time.

I gathered this information on Thursday but I'm not going to say my list
is totally complete:

http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page3.html#2-15-07

It's under Item #2. Since this was for an email report I send out to
clients, my comments are subjective.


Malke
--
Elephant Boy Computers
www.elephantboycomputers.com
"Don't Panic!"
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User

A little buried but still good. I think we should create a page that is kept
up to date with this info. I can host it or you can.

"Malke" wrote:

> Jesper wrote:
> > Is anyone aware of an up-to-date table that lists which AV programs are Vista
> > ready, and which run on 64-bit? There was a list about a year ago but it has
> > not been updated for quite some time.
>
> I gathered this information on Thursday but I'm not going to say my list
> is totally complete:
>
> http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page3.html#2-15-07
>
> It's under Item #2. Since this was for an email report I send out to
> clients, my comments are subjective.
>
>
> Malke
> --
> Elephant Boy Computers
> www.elephantboycomputers.com
> "Don't Panic!"
> MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User
>