Re: Question on running priviledge?
Doh, just to clarify further! With regard to non UAC aware apps, some
admin functions regarding writing to Program File or HKLM will actually
work if Virtualisation is enabled, but the data will be written to the
user-specific virtual stores.
To further confuse matters, if an application *is* UAC aware, then
Virtualisation is disabled by the OS and if that app did not specify in
its manifest that it requires Admin privs yet tries to do admin
functions (including writing to Program Files/HKLM) then it will also
fail and possibly crash.
David Hearn wrote:
> Just to clarify a little.
> If a program *which is UAC aware* needs admin privileges you will still
> be prompted for consent. If a non UAC aware program (ie. legacy, not
> updated for Vista) needs admin privileges for some function calls, those
> calls will fail, probably crashing the application.
> UAC dialogs and auth requests are not free.
> Colin Barnhorst wrote:
>> The answer to (1) is no. You are running as a standard user with
>> admin rights when needed. If a program needs admin priviledges you
>> will still be prompted for consent. A standard user without admin
>> rights would also be prompted but for an admin password.
>> "Polaris" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
>>> Hi Experts:
>>> I have a few questions on user privilege under Vista:
>>> (1) If I login Vista as an admin and then start to run some
>>> applications normally, are those apps running with admin privilege?
>>> Or I have to right-click the app and then fire it up through "Run as
>>> (2) Suppose a batch file starts 3 apps, if I run the batch file using
>>> the "Run as administrator" option, will the 3 applications be running
>>> with admin privilege?
>>> Thanks in Advance!