
12-15-2006
|
|
|
|
Re: Security in Vista Business vs. Vista Ultimate
In article <MPG.1fec448edf20b66d98a312@msnews.microsoft.com >, in
the microsoft.public.windows.vista.security news group, Paul
Adare <padare@newsguy.com> says...
> In article <MPG.1fec1e238de5e85998a30d@msnews.microsoft.com >, in
> the microsoft.public.windows.vista.security news group, Paul
> Adare <padare@newsguy.com> says...
>
> > In article <D62F1EB0-43E1-4721-8E6A-0A5EE5154C64@microsoft.com>,
> > in the microsoft.public.windows.vista.security news group, Jeff
> > Lynch [MVP] <jeff.lynch@newsgroup.nospam> says...
> >
> > > Are the default security settings different in Vista Business than in Vista
> > > Ultimate (both RTM)? I've noticed a special account called
> > > "TrustedInstaller" in Vista Business that has full control permissions for
> > > the system32 folder and files but this account doesn't seem to exist in
> > > Vista Ultimate. I'm trying to install Outlook 2007 Business Contact Manager
> > > under Vista Business and it fails due to a permissions error but it installs
> > > just fine under Vista Ultimate.
> >
> > Jeff, are these both clean installs of RTM and not upgrade
> > installs of a previous release? My understanding is that the
> > TrustedInstaller is gone in the RTM versions of all Vista SKUs.
> > I've not installed Business yet but I know it is gone from
> > Ultimate and I know that I read somewhere recently that
> > TrustedInstaller is gone...
> >
> > I'll try and throw Business up in a VM today and check.
>
> Ok, so no TrustedInstaller in a clean install of Business
> either.
Hmm, but it does show up in the Windows folder DACL on both
Ultimate and Business. Weird. I'll see what I can dig up...
--
Paul Adare - MVP Virtual Machines
Waiting for a bus is about as thrilling as fishing,
with the similar tantalisation that something,
sometime, somehow, will turn up. George Courtauld
|