Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
|
|
testing
microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance maintenance
|
|
08-18-2008
|
|
|
|
testing
testing testing testing testing testing testing
|
|
08-20-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: testing
The reason there is a designated test group is so that the working groups
are not clogged with test messages. I wasn't being rude or impolite, nor did
I chastise the poster, I merely pointed out that there is a more appropriate
place for testing a connection. A test post is no more appropriate in a
Vista group than is a question about Windows98.
--
Best of Luck,
Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com
"Flight" <jPUNTvoorbeeld@gmailPUNTcom> wrote in message
news:ePz1FOhAJHA.1228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
>
> "Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org> schreef in bericht
> news:er7XHceAJHA.4148@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.test.here is the more
>> appropriate group for this.
>>
>> --
>> Best of Luck,
>>
>> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
>> Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
>> My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com
>>
>> "PerryFeral" <PerryFeral@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4u7ia4tjqk418oilgrfli3qi2fv726dtf8@4ax.com...
>>> testing testing testing testing testing testing
>>
>
> Come on, leave the guy! Is it so important then?
|
|
08-20-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: testing
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:55:36 -0400, "Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org>
wrote:
>The reason there is a designated test group is so that the working groups
>are not clogged with test messages. I wasn't being rude or impolite, nor did
>I chastise the poster, I merely pointed out that there is a more appropriate
>place for testing a connection. A test post is no more appropriate in a
>Vista group than is a question about Windows98.
Well, since we get - what? - maybe 2 or 3 such posts a month in the
entire vista* heirarchy, it's really not worth fussing about, is it?
|
|
08-20-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: testing
"Paul Montgomery" <nonnymoose@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c1rma4d2ukmitg9up351feenst4u8dh5ca@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:55:36 -0400, "Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org>
> wrote:
>
>>The reason there is a designated test group is so that the working groups
>>are not clogged with test messages. I wasn't being rude or impolite, nor
>>did
>>I chastise the poster, I merely pointed out that there is a more
>>appropriate
>>place for testing a connection. A test post is no more appropriate in a
>>Vista group than is a question about Windows98.
>
> Well, since we get - what? - maybe 2 or 3 such posts a month in the
> entire vista* heirarchy, it's really not worth fussing about, is it?
I've never counted how many there were, but if people didn't take the
trouble to point out that test posts are inappropriate here, it's very
likely that we would have many more.
|
|
08-20-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: testing
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:55:57 -0700, "Ken Blake"
<kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote:
>"Paul Montgomery" <nonnymoose@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:c1rma4d2ukmitg9up351feenst4u8dh5ca@4ax.com.. .
>
>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:55:36 -0400, "Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>The reason there is a designated test group is so that the working groups
>>>are not clogged with test messages. I wasn't being rude or impolite, nor
>>>did
>>>I chastise the poster, I merely pointed out that there is a more
>>>appropriate
>>>place for testing a connection. A test post is no more appropriate in a
>>>Vista group than is a question about Windows98.
>>
>> Well, since we get - what? - maybe 2 or 3 such posts a month in the
>> entire vista* heirarchy, it's really not worth fussing about, is it?
>
>
>I've never counted how many there were, but if people didn't take the
>trouble to point out that test posts are inappropriate here, it's very
>likely that we would have many more.
Killfile: subject: test "or" testing
|
|
08-20-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: testing
"DDW" <ddwright@KILLSPAMcomcast.net> wrote in message
news:jjqoa499tu8jfq4akn3ua8r7vp5i9fphf2@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:55:57 -0700, "Ken Blake"
> <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote:
>
>>"Paul Montgomery" <nonnymoose@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:c1rma4d2ukmitg9up351feenst4u8dh5ca@4ax.com. ..
>>
>>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:55:36 -0400, "Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>The reason there is a designated test group is so that the working
>>>>groups
>>>>are not clogged with test messages. I wasn't being rude or impolite, nor
>>>>did
>>>>I chastise the poster, I merely pointed out that there is a more
>>>>appropriate
>>>>place for testing a connection. A test post is no more appropriate in a
>>>>Vista group than is a question about Windows98.
>>>
>>> Well, since we get - what? - maybe 2 or 3 such posts a month in the
>>> entire vista* heirarchy, it's really not worth fussing about, is it?
>>
>>
>>I've never counted how many there were, but if people didn't take the
>>trouble to point out that test posts are inappropriate here, it's very
>>likely that we would have many more.
>
> Killfile: subject: test "or" testing
Your choice, but I wouldn't. I can conceive of lots of legitimate posts that
incorporated one or the other of those words in the subject line.
|
|
08-22-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: testing
"Ken Blake" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> schreef in bericht
news:e29mbTtAJHA.5884@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> "Paul Montgomery" <nonnymoose@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:c1rma4d2ukmitg9up351feenst4u8dh5ca@4ax.com...
>
>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:55:36 -0400, "Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>The reason there is a designated test group is so that the working groups
>>>are not clogged with test messages. I wasn't being rude or impolite, nor
>>>did
>>>I chastise the poster, I merely pointed out that there is a more
>>>appropriate
>>>place for testing a connection. A test post is no more appropriate in a
>>>Vista group than is a question about Windows98.
>>
>> Well, since we get - what? - maybe 2 or 3 such posts a month in the
>> entire vista* heirarchy, it's really not worth fussing about, is it?
>
>
> I've never counted how many there were, but if people didn't take the
> trouble to point out that test posts are inappropriate here, it's very
> likely that we would have many more.
>
>
Any proof of that? Or just suggesting? Come on, let people with less
experience than you, *crack* also find their way. We have had now more
messages about this one testing than all the testing messages I have seen so
far. So shut up!
|
|
08-22-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: testing
"Flight" <jPUNTvoorbeeld@gmailPUNTcom> schreef in bericht
news:eTSKtKEBJHA.1912@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
>
> "Ken Blake" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> schreef in bericht
> news:e29mbTtAJHA.5884@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> "Paul Montgomery" <nonnymoose@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:c1rma4d2ukmitg9up351feenst4u8dh5ca@4ax.com...
>>
>>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:55:36 -0400, "Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>The reason there is a designated test group is so that the working
>>>>groups
>>>>are not clogged with test messages. I wasn't being rude or impolite, nor
>>>>did
>>>>I chastise the poster, I merely pointed out that there is a more
>>>>appropriate
>>>>place for testing a connection. A test post is no more appropriate in a
>>>>Vista group than is a question about Windows98.
>>>
>>> Well, since we get - what? - maybe 2 or 3 such posts a month in the
>>> entire vista* heirarchy, it's really not worth fussing about, is it?
>>
>>
>> I've never counted how many there were, but if people didn't take the
>> trouble to point out that test posts are inappropriate here, it's very
>> likely that we would have many more.
>>
>>
> Any proof of that? Or just suggesting? Come on, let people with less
> experience than you, *crack* also find their way. We have had now more
> messages about this one testing than all the testing messages I have seen
> so far. So shut up!
Sorry, was ment for Ken Blake.
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| testing |
Bess |
microsoft.public.windows.vista.mail |
2 |
06-06-2008 23:14 |
| testing |
maryun |
microsoft.public.windows.vista.music pictures video |
0 |
04-01-2008 01:31 |
| testing |
Jeremy |
microsoft.public.pt.windows.vista |
0 |
12-11-2007 19:58 |
| Hello Testing |
Shari.S.Walker |
microsoft.public.windows.vista.mail |
1 |
09-20-2007 03:19 |
| testing |
Les |
microsoft.public.windows.vista.mail |
1 |
04-18-2007 18:50 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:27.
|
|
