Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads
Recommended Download



Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Driver Scanner

Is this ok for Performance rating?

microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance maintenance






Speedup My PC
Reply
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2007
=?Utf-8?B?VGVjaG5vSGlj?=
 

Posts: n/a
Is this ok for Performance rating?
I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid card,
10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...

Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
Memory 5.2
Graphics 5.9
Gaming 5.8
Disk Drive 5.9

How good is that?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2007
Roy Coorne
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
TechnoHic wrote:
> I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid card,
> 10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>
> Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
> Memory 5.2
> Graphics 5.9
> Gaming 5.8
> Disk Drive 5.9
>
> How good is that?


Top, excellent, outstanding!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2007
Bob
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
"Roy Coorne" <rcoorne@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uWNQl9YbHHA.2448@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> TechnoHic wrote:
>> I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid
>> card, 10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>>
>> Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
>> Memory 5.2 Graphics 5.9
>> Gaming 5.8
>> Disk Drive 5.9
>>
>> How good is that?

>
> Top, excellent, outstanding!



Has MS ever said what the highest that these scores can be? Are we using a
1-10 scale for instance?
Bob


Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2007
DevilsPGD
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
In message <3053B879-F9CF-4E6E-AA7B-626C41874003@microsoft.com>
TechnoHic <TechnoHic@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid card,
>10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>
>Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
>Memory 5.2
>Graphics 5.9
>Gaming 5.8
>Disk Drive 5.9
>
>How good is that?


On a scale of 1 to 5.0, it scores about a 4.3...

(yeah yeah, nobody likes a smartass)
--
Insert something clever here.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2007
Bob
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
"DevilsPGD" <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net> wrote in message
news:ddi803l98qtl3vntqsjacpu06u5vm3npr0@4ax.com...
> In message <3053B879-F9CF-4E6E-AA7B-626C41874003@microsoft.com>
> TechnoHic <TechnoHic@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>>I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid
>>card,
>>10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>>
>>Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
>>Memory 5.2
>>Graphics 5.9
>>Gaming 5.8
>>Disk Drive 5.9
>>
>>How good is that?

>
> On a scale of 1 to 5.0, it scores about a 4.3...
>
> (yeah yeah, nobody likes a smartass)
> --
> Insert something clever here.


Maybe we need to start a thread for people to post their scores and
equipment like above. Might be of some help to people building new computers
that will run Vista as to how particular subsystems perform (in the world
according to Vista anyway).
Bob


Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2007
Ken Blake, MVP
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
Bob wrote:

> "Roy Coorne" <rcoorne@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uWNQl9YbHHA.2448@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> TechnoHic wrote:
>>> I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x
>>> vid card, 10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>>>
>>> Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
>>> Memory 5.2 Graphics 5.9
>>> Gaming 5.8
>>> Disk Drive 5.9
>>>
>>> How good is that?

>>
>> Top, excellent, outstanding!

>
>
> Has MS ever said what the highest that these scores can be? Are we
> using a 1-10 scale for instance?



If you click on "What do these numbers mean>" you will see that "The base
scores currently range from 1 to 5.9."

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup


Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2007
Dustin Harper
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
It's a P4 3.4, right? That's a good score for it, being a single core and
all. I have a P4 3.4 and get a 4.2. Your other scores are pretty high,
actual some are really high! That's really good, and you wouldn't notice
much of a score increase by overclocking, I went from a 4.2 to a SUPRISE 4.2
after overclocking from 3.0 to 3.4. A dual core would be a better upgrade
(Core2Duo or Athlon 64 X2).

--
Dustin Harper
dharper@vistarip.com
http://www.vistarip.com

--
"TechnoHic" <TechnoHic@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3053B879-F9CF-4E6E-AA7B-626C41874003@microsoft.com...
>I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid card,
> 10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>
> Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
> Memory 5.2
> Graphics 5.9
> Gaming 5.8
> Disk Drive 5.9
>
> How good is that?


Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2007
Paul Smith
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?

"Bob" <luna5nospam@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:uBbYtCZbHHA.3408@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> Has MS ever said what the highest that these scores can be? Are we using
> a 1-10 scale for instance?


At the moment it goes go 5.9. However as faster hardware is released so the
number will increase.

--
Paul Smith,
Yeovil, UK.
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User.
http://www.windowsresource.net/

*Remove nospam. to reply by e-mail*

Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2007
Carl G
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
I must be behind times already. I haven't heard of a 4.4 cpu.
Darn it!!! and I thought I was keeping up on things.

--
Carl G

"Dustin Harper" <dharper@vistarip.com> wrote in message
news:A4E1F029-F273-45E6-B374-12203D757356@microsoft.com...
> It's a P4 3.4, right? That's a good score for it, being a single core and
> all. I have a P4 3.4 and get a 4.2. Your other scores are pretty high,
> actual some are really high! That's really good, and you wouldn't
> notice much of a score increase by overclocking, I went from a 4.2 to a
> SUPRISE 4.2 after overclocking from 3.0 to 3.4. A dual core would be a
> better upgrade (Core2Duo or Athlon 64 X2).
>
> --
> Dustin Harper
> dharper@vistarip.com
> http://www.vistarip.com
>
> --
> "TechnoHic" <TechnoHic@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:3053B879-F9CF-4E6E-AA7B-626C41874003@microsoft.com...
>>I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid
>>card,
>> 10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>>
>> Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
>> Memory 5.2
>> Graphics 5.9
>> Gaming 5.8
>> Disk Drive 5.9
>>
>> How good is that?

>

Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2007
DevilsPGD
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
In message <3053B879-F9CF-4E6E-AA7B-626C41874003@microsoft.com>
TechnoHic <TechnoHic@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid card,
>10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>
>Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
>Memory 5.2
>Graphics 5.9
>Gaming 5.8
>Disk Drive 5.9
>
>How good is that?


Actually, despite my previous smartass response, the Processor score
isn't all that great.

I'm scoring a 4.8 on my 2GB Athlon 64 X2, I'd have expected the latest
and greatest Intel chip would at least match my two+ year old CPU.

That being said, the score isn't really useful for much, what is more
important is how your system performs for your needs.
--
Insert something clever here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATI X800 Performance Rating 1.0 =?Utf-8?B?U3RldmU=?= microsoft.public.windows.vista hardware devices 1 03-29-2007 05:32
Performance Rating Mark microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance maintenance 2 03-05-2007 12:09
Rating =?Utf-8?B?emR1Y3RtYW4=?= microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 6 03-01-2007 15:21
Updating of Performance Rating not possible anymore =?Utf-8?B?c29mYW1lbnNjaA==?= microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 2 02-28-2007 22:56
Low memory performance rating microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance maintenance 19 12-06-2006 02:32




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:19.




Driver Scanner - Free Scan Now

Vistaheads.com is part of the Heads Network. See also XPHeads.com , Win7Heads.com and Win8Heads.com.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120