Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
|
|
Is this ok for Performance rating?
microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance maintenance
|
|

03-23-2007
|
|
|
|
Is this ok for Performance rating?
I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid card,
10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
Memory 5.2
Graphics 5.9
Gaming 5.8
Disk Drive 5.9
How good is that?
|
|

03-23-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
TechnoHic wrote:
> I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid card,
> 10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>
> Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
> Memory 5.2
> Graphics 5.9
> Gaming 5.8
> Disk Drive 5.9
>
> How good is that?
Top, excellent, outstanding!
|
|

03-23-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
"Roy Coorne" <rcoorne@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uWNQl9YbHHA.2448@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> TechnoHic wrote:
>> I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid
>> card, 10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>>
>> Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
>> Memory 5.2 Graphics 5.9
>> Gaming 5.8
>> Disk Drive 5.9
>>
>> How good is that?
>
> Top, excellent, outstanding!
Has MS ever said what the highest that these scores can be? Are we using a
1-10 scale for instance?
Bob
|
|

03-23-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
In message <3053B879-F9CF-4E6E-AA7B-626C41874003@microsoft.com>
TechnoHic <TechnoHic@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid card,
>10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>
>Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
>Memory 5.2
>Graphics 5.9
>Gaming 5.8
>Disk Drive 5.9
>
>How good is that?
On a scale of 1 to 5.0, it scores about a 4.3...
(yeah yeah, nobody likes a smartass)
--
Insert something clever here.
|
|

03-24-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
"DevilsPGD" <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net> wrote in message
news:ddi803l98qtl3vntqsjacpu06u5vm3npr0@4ax.com...
> In message <3053B879-F9CF-4E6E-AA7B-626C41874003@microsoft.com>
> TechnoHic <TechnoHic@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>>I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid
>>card,
>>10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>>
>>Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
>>Memory 5.2
>>Graphics 5.9
>>Gaming 5.8
>>Disk Drive 5.9
>>
>>How good is that?
>
> On a scale of 1 to 5.0, it scores about a 4.3...
>
> (yeah yeah, nobody likes a smartass)
> --
> Insert something clever here.
Maybe we need to start a thread for people to post their scores and
equipment like above. Might be of some help to people building new computers
that will run Vista as to how particular subsystems perform (in the world
according to Vista anyway).
Bob
|
|

03-24-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
Bob wrote:
> "Roy Coorne" <rcoorne@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uWNQl9YbHHA.2448@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> TechnoHic wrote:
>>> I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x
>>> vid card, 10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>>>
>>> Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
>>> Memory 5.2 Graphics 5.9
>>> Gaming 5.8
>>> Disk Drive 5.9
>>>
>>> How good is that?
>>
>> Top, excellent, outstanding!
>
>
> Has MS ever said what the highest that these scores can be? Are we
> using a 1-10 scale for instance?
If you click on "What do these numbers mean>" you will see that "The base
scores currently range from 1 to 5.9."
--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup
|
|

03-24-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
It's a P4 3.4, right? That's a good score for it, being a single core and
all. I have a P4 3.4 and get a 4.2. Your other scores are pretty high,
actual some are really high!  That's really good, and you wouldn't notice
much of a score increase by overclocking, I went from a 4.2 to a SUPRISE 4.2
after overclocking from 3.0 to 3.4. A dual core would be a better upgrade
(Core2Duo or Athlon 64 X2).
--
Dustin Harper
dharper@vistarip.com
http://www.vistarip.com
--
"TechnoHic" <TechnoHic@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3053B879-F9CF-4E6E-AA7B-626C41874003@microsoft.com...
>I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid card,
> 10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>
> Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
> Memory 5.2
> Graphics 5.9
> Gaming 5.8
> Disk Drive 5.9
>
> How good is that?
|
|

03-24-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
"Bob" <luna5nospam@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:uBbYtCZbHHA.3408@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Has MS ever said what the highest that these scores can be? Are we using
> a 1-10 scale for instance?
At the moment it goes go 5.9. However as faster hardware is released so the
number will increase.
--
Paul Smith,
Yeovil, UK.
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User.
http://www.windowsresource.net/
*Remove nospam. to reply by e-mail*
|
|

03-24-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
I must be behind times already. I haven't heard of a 4.4 cpu.
Darn it!!! and I thought I was keeping up on things.
--
Carl G
"Dustin Harper" <dharper@vistarip.com> wrote in message
news:A4E1F029-F273-45E6-B374-12203D757356@microsoft.com...
> It's a P4 3.4, right? That's a good score for it, being a single core and
> all. I have a P4 3.4 and get a 4.2. Your other scores are pretty high,
> actual some are really high! That's really good, and you wouldn't
> notice much of a score increase by overclocking, I went from a 4.2 to a
> SUPRISE 4.2 after overclocking from 3.0 to 3.4. A dual core would be a
> better upgrade (Core2Duo or Athlon 64 X2).
>
> --
> Dustin Harper
> dharper@vistarip.com
> http://www.vistarip.com
>
> --
> "TechnoHic" <TechnoHic@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:3053B879-F9CF-4E6E-AA7B-626C41874003@microsoft.com...
>>I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid
>>card,
>> 10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>>
>> Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
>> Memory 5.2
>> Graphics 5.9
>> Gaming 5.8
>> Disk Drive 5.9
>>
>> How good is that?
>
|
|

03-24-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Is this ok for Performance rating?
In message <3053B879-F9CF-4E6E-AA7B-626C41874003@microsoft.com>
TechnoHic <TechnoHic@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>I got a P4 4.4 GHZ (single core) 3gb RAM, 512 MB X1950 pro AGP 8x vid card,
>10000 RPM 70 GB WD Raptor HD and Im getting...
>
>Processor 4.3 (damn single core, should I over clock it maybe?)
>Memory 5.2
>Graphics 5.9
>Gaming 5.8
>Disk Drive 5.9
>
>How good is that?
Actually, despite my previous smartass response, the Processor score
isn't all that great.
I'm scoring a 4.8 on my 2GB Athlon 64 X2, I'd have expected the latest
and greatest Intel chip would at least match my two+ year old CPU.
That being said, the score isn't really useful for much, what is more
important is how your system performs for your needs.
--
Insert something clever here.
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:17.
|
|