Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
|
|
Complete PC Backup: full vs. incremental
microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance maintenance
|
|

05-28-2008
|
|
|
|
Complete PC Backup: full vs. incremental
I would like to *manually* save different versions of Complete PC
Backup, but Vista won't give me that option and will only save
incremental backups. As someone noticed here on the forums, "using the
*scheduled* backup is the only way to get the checkbox to create full
backups, each and every time you want one". However, scheduled backups
is not what I want to do, as I'm losing control of the exact PC
versions.
Can I rename the earlier backup to something else (eg.
"WindowsImageBackup1"), so Vista would create a new folder
"WindowsImageBackup" and save a new full backup into it? If yes, when I
rename the folder from "WindowsImageBackup1" back to
"WindowsImageBackup" in order to restore the earlier version of PC, will
it get corrupted or confuse Vista?
--
kub
|
|

05-28-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Complete PC Backup: full vs. incremental
kub;729024 Wrote:
> I would like to *manually* save different versions of Complete PC
> Backup, but Vista won't give me that option and will only save
> incremental backups. As someone noticed here on the forums, "using the
> *scheduled* backup is the only way to get the checkbox to create full
> backups, each and every time you want one". However, scheduled backups
> is not what I want to do, as I'm losing control of the exact PC
> versions.
>
> Can I rename the earlier backup to something else (eg.
> "WindowsImageBackup1"), so Vista would create a new folder
> "WindowsImageBackup" and save a new full backup into it? If yes, when I
> rename the folder from "WindowsImageBackup1" back to
> "WindowsImageBackup" in order to restore the earlier version of PC, will
> it get corrupted or confuse Vista?
Hi Kub,
You can select a different location to save the complete PC backup on
to have a different backup instead of incremental. For example, on
another partition, drive, or CD/DVD.
Hope this helps,
Shawn
--
Brink
*There are no dumb questions, just the people that do not ask
them.*
'*VISTA FORUMS*' ( http://www.vistax64.com)
*Please post feedback to help others.*
|
|

05-28-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Complete PC Backup: full vs. incremental
Brink;729071 Wrote:
>
> You can select a different location to save the complete PC backup on
> to have a different backup instead of incremental. For example, on
> another partition, drive, or CD/DVD.
So if I want to save, say, five different PC configuratons, I would
need to create five partitions on my USB HDD? Is it my only option? The
simple trick with renaming folders won't work?
--
kub
|
|

05-28-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Complete PC Backup: full vs. incremental
Sorry Kub,
It will only let you select a listed drive letter or CD/DVD and not any
location in the drive.
Shawn
--
Brink
*There are no dumb questions, just the people that do not ask
them.*
'*VISTA FORUMS*' ( http://www.vistax64.com)
*Please post feedback to help others.*
|
|

05-28-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Complete PC Backup: full vs. incremental
Brink;729118 Wrote:
> Sorry Kub,
>
> It will only let you select a listed drive letter or CD/DVD and not any
> location in the drive.
>
> Shawn
Yes, that's why I'm asking about the renaming trick:
Let's say, I save a Complete PC Backup and rename it to
"WindowsImageBackup1". Then I save another backup on the same disk, and
Vista automatically creates a new folder "WindowsImageBackup" for it. I
rename it "WindowsImageBackup2", and go on... Finally, I have five
different backups on the same disk. Whenever I want to restore from any
of them, I rename the needed folder back to "WindowsImageBackup" and
boot my restore DVD. Vista finds the right folder and ignores the other
four, because they have modified names.
Will this trick work with Vista?
--
kub
|
|

05-29-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Complete PC Backup: full vs. incremental
Alright, so the scheduled backup was not what you wanted, I tried. But, that
is where the checkbox is... and it has to be set to us the command line
function for making backups.
http://technet2.microsoft.com/window....mspx?mfr=true
From and elevated prompt: (if no options used, it defaults to the
*scheduled* backup options)
wbadmin start backup
[-backupTarget:{<TargetVolume> | <TargetNetworkShare>}]
[-include:<VolumesToInclude>]
[-allCritical]
[-noVerify]
[-user:<UserName>]
[-password:<Password>]
[-noinheritAcl]
[-vssFull]
[-quiet]
Pay particular attention to the -backupTarget command. You will see that you
can use other than the default and create the separate folders you were
looking to do. Unfortunately, this also means that you probably have to use
the command line option to restore the backup since it won't be standard
naming convention.
"kub" <guest@unknown-email.com> wrote in message
news:8eafa1838c651760ec25fef53ec92721@nntp-gateway.com...
>
> I would like to *manually* save different versions of Complete PC
> Backup, but Vista won't give me that option and will only save
> incremental backups. As someone noticed here on the forums, "using the
> *scheduled* backup is the only way to get the checkbox to create full
> backups, each and every time you want one". However, scheduled backups
> is not what I want to do, as I'm losing control of the exact PC
> versions.
>
> Can I rename the earlier backup to something else (eg.
> "WindowsImageBackup1"), so Vista would create a new folder
> "WindowsImageBackup" and save a new full backup into it? If yes, when I
> rename the folder from "WindowsImageBackup1" back to
> "WindowsImageBackup" in order to restore the earlier version of PC, will
> it get corrupted or confuse Vista?
>
>
> --
> kub
|
|

05-29-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Complete PC Backup: full vs. incremental
PS. The Backup Recovery command states it is only valid in Windows 2008, but
in the preceding paragraph it states it can be started from the Vista
Installation DVD by going to the Repair Option and opening a command prompt
from there. Then the command is similar to the backup:
wbadmin start sysrecovery
For more details, look at the previously supplied link.
"Mark" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:CDDB0BD7-1636-4450-A94E-D64845E5638B@microsoft.com...
> Alright, so the scheduled backup was not what you wanted, I tried. But,
> that is where the checkbox is... and it has to be set to us the command
> line function for making backups.
>
> http://technet2.microsoft.com/window....mspx?mfr=true
>
> From and elevated prompt: (if no options used, it defaults to the
> *scheduled* backup options)
> wbadmin start backup
> [-backupTarget:{<TargetVolume> | <TargetNetworkShare>}]
> [-include:<VolumesToInclude>]
> [-allCritical]
> [-noVerify]
> [-user:<UserName>]
> [-password:<Password>]
> [-noinheritAcl]
> [-vssFull]
> [-quiet]
>
> Pay particular attention to the -backupTarget command. You will see that
> you can use other than the default and create the separate folders you
> were looking to do. Unfortunately, this also means that you probably have
> to use the command line option to restore the backup since it won't be
> standard naming convention.
>
>
>
> "kub" <guest@unknown-email.com> wrote in message
> news:8eafa1838c651760ec25fef53ec92721@nntp-gateway.com...
>>
>> I would like to *manually* save different versions of Complete PC
>> Backup, but Vista won't give me that option and will only save
>> incremental backups. As someone noticed here on the forums, "using the
>> *scheduled* backup is the only way to get the checkbox to create full
>> backups, each and every time you want one". However, scheduled backups
>> is not what I want to do, as I'm losing control of the exact PC
>> versions.
>>
>> Can I rename the earlier backup to something else (eg.
>> "WindowsImageBackup1"), so Vista would create a new folder
>> "WindowsImageBackup" and save a new full backup into it? If yes, when I
>> rename the folder from "WindowsImageBackup1" back to
>> "WindowsImageBackup" in order to restore the earlier version of PC, will
>> it get corrupted or confuse Vista?
>>
>>
>> --
>> kub
>
|
|

05-29-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Complete PC Backup: full vs. incremental
"kub" <guest@unknown-email.com> wrote in message
news:8eafa1838c651760ec25fef53ec92721@nntp-gateway.com...
>
> I would like to *manually* save different versions of Complete PC
> Backup, but Vista won't give me that option and will only save
> incremental backups. As someone noticed here on the forums, "using the
> *scheduled* backup is the only way to get the checkbox to create full
> backups, each and every time you want one". However, scheduled backups
> is not what I want to do, as I'm losing control of the exact PC
> versions.
>
> Can I rename the earlier backup to something else (eg.
> "WindowsImageBackup1"), so Vista would create a new folder
> "WindowsImageBackup" and save a new full backup into it? If yes, when I
> rename the folder from "WindowsImageBackup1" back to
> "WindowsImageBackup" in order to restore the earlier version of PC, will
> it get corrupted or confuse Vista?
>
>
> --
> kub
The limitations of Vista's backup program are the reason I decided,
long ago, to purchase Acronis True Image Home 11. I do full backups only and
I can have them backed up to a location on one of my external hard drives. I
can then create a new folder and move it to that folder. I can then copy it
again or move it anywhere I wish on that drive or my other external drive. I
keep several different backups this way.
When I decide to restore I simply navigate to the particular folder I
want and restore the backup from within that folder. The individual backups
themselves retain the same name (all of them) but the folders can be renamed
to your heart's desire, such as backup 01, 02, 03, etc. etc. etc. or you can
rename them according to date, software, etc., etc., etc.
C.B.
--
It is the responsibility and duty of everyone to help the underprivileged
and unfortunate among us.
|
|

05-30-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Complete PC Backup: full vs. incremental
C.B. wrote:
> The limitations of Vista's backup program are the reason I decided,
> long ago, to purchase Acronis True Image Home 11. I do full backups only
> and I can have them backed up to a location on one of my external hard
> drives. I can then create a new folder and move it to that folder. I can
> then copy it again or move it anywhere I wish on that drive or my other
> external drive. I keep several different backups this way.
> When I decide to restore I simply navigate to the particular folder
> I want and restore the backup from within that folder. The individual
> backups themselves retain the same name (all of them) but the folders
> can be renamed to your heart's desire, such as backup 01, 02, 03, etc.
> etc. etc. or you can rename them according to date, software, etc.,
> etc., etc.
>
> C.B.
Please forgive me for butting in C.B., but I have a tender spot in my
heart for folks who give recommendations for Acronis True Image. I
bought it based on a recommendation very similar to yours and it turned
out to be a very expensive headache. I could get it to do a disc image,
but never could get it to do a data backup. It is extremely buggy,
complicated and difficult to use. Finally, when I uninstalled it, I
ended up with a damaged master boot record. They're tech support forum
has more traffic than this NG, and that should indicate something to all
of us. If it works for you, I'm glad. I will preach against it.
--
Dave T.
|
|

05-30-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Complete PC Backup: full vs. incremental
On Thu, 29 May 2008 16:45:14 -0700, "Dave T." <davey@MyPlace.net>
wrote:
>Please forgive me for butting in C.B., but I have a tender spot in my
>heart for folks who give recommendations for Acronis True Image. I
>bought it based on a recommendation very similar to yours and it turned
>out to be a very expensive headache. I could get it to do a disc image,
>but never could get it to do a data backup. It is extremely buggy,
>complicated and difficult to use.
If that was true, you wouldn't be seeing all the recommendations for
it.
YOU may have had problems with it, but apparently you're in the
minority... here or elsewhere.
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:42.
|
|