Re: Microsoft ACCESS 2003 HELP!!!!
I'm guessing your deadline came and passed and all hell broke loose?
"Kerry Liles" <email@example.com> wrote in message
> Access is not very robust - especially with a large number of tables
> and/or a complex schema (such as it is).
> You didn't mention whether free was a consideration, but MySQL might be
> worth looking at. It has quirks too, but a zillion people use it (since
> it is free).
> "Jana" <Jana@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> have a major problem. I am developing a database for a client that
>> over 302 tables, all of which have thousands of rows. 301 of these
>> need to be linked to the parent table, and all have the same primary key.
>> However, I have recieved that evil error message that only 32 tables can
>> indexed. I have searched and searched, but cannot find a solution to
>> I am desperate for any suggestions, even if it means taking avenues other
>> than ACCESS 2003. The only requirements are that the database has the
>> ability to be online, collecting data from other parties via some sort of
>> form. Also, these tables must have full capabilities to be edited and
>> controlled, not read-only. CAN ANYONE HELP ME??? There is a huge
>> coming in hours. Thanks!