The metric values for the two cards are the same. Here is a copy of the route
table:
IPv4 Route Table
================================================== =========================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.149 20
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.145 20
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.0.149 276
192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.0.145 276
192.168.0.145 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.0.145 276
192.168.0.149 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.0.149 276
192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.0.149 276
192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.0.145 276
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.0.149 276
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.0.145 276
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.0.149 276
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.0.145 276
================================================== =========================
Is it possible to set something in the registry so the wired adapter gets a
lower metric?
"Robert L. (MS-MVP)" wrote:
> You may need to modify the router metric. Posting the result of routing
> table here my help.
>
> --
> Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
> Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on
> http://www.ChicagoTech.net
> How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on
> http://www.HowToNetworking.com
>
>
> "dna86" <dna86@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:7AFAE03A-BC01-4607-930C-EF73E591B1CC@microsoft.com...
> > With XP, I could be working on wireless, then plug in an ethernet cable
> > and
> > traffic instantly switches over to the faster wired network. With Vista,
> > this
> > does not work. Plugging in a wired cable does not switch the traffic. I
> > have
> > to disable the wireless connection and restart explorer. Is there a way to
> > get this to work? Is it a security issue?
>