Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
|
|
Mapped share access over VPN solution
microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking sharing
|
|

09-20-2007
|
|
|
|
Mapped share access over VPN solution
I have fought this one for months. Mapped drives that worked fine in the
office were not accessible over a VPN connection. I searched and searched
for a solution in vain. I tried all of the solutions and hotfixes that
seemed related: The SMB shares hotfix (kb933468), the route metric hotfix
(kb930163), deleting cached credentials (cmdkey.exe /delete /ras), remove
IPv6 for the VPN connection, set the DNS server address explicitly in the
network adapter settings, etc, etc. To no avail.
Turns out the solution was simple. Map the drive with the fully qualified
domain name of the server. We map drives via script so this is a fairly easy
to implement solution. If you map drives via the 'Map Network Drives'
command in 'Computer' then you have to add the domain suffixes manually when
you map the drive. So the format of the mapped drive path should look like
this: '\\server1.contoso.com\fileshares\staff' instead of the default map
for the same share that looks like this: '\\server1\fileshares\staff'. You
have to adjust this in the path window when you map the drive. I have not
found a way yet to alter the map once it is created.
Seems stupid that windows vista doesn't use the FQDN for the map, but you
need to use it for the map to be available over a VPN connection. We us VPN
alot since we travel often. I have held up several Vista upgrades until I
could resolve this one.
I hope this helps any of you who have also been frustrated by this problem.
--
Russell Reid
|
|

09-20-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Mapped share access over VPN solution
Thank you for sharing your experience with us. The other two options are setup WINS or DNS suffix in the client site for NetBIOS name resolution.
Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net
How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com
"Russell Reid" <RussellReid@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:938A3C44-B5EB-42E9-93D2-E191DA89F38D@microsoft.com...
I have fought this one for months. Mapped drives that worked fine in the
office were not accessible over a VPN connection. I searched and searched
for a solution in vain. I tried all of the solutions and hotfixes that
seemed related: The SMB shares hotfix (kb933468), the route metric hotfix
(kb930163), deleting cached credentials (cmdkey.exe /delete /ras), remove
IPv6 for the VPN connection, set the DNS server address explicitly in the
network adapter settings, etc, etc. To no avail.
Turns out the solution was simple. Map the drive with the fully qualified
domain name of the server. We map drives via script so this is a fairly easy
to implement solution. If you map drives via the 'Map Network Drives'
command in 'Computer' then you have to add the domain suffixes manually when
you map the drive. So the format of the mapped drive path should look like
this: '\\server1.contoso.com\fileshares\staff' instead of the default map
for the same share that looks like this: '\\server1\fileshares\staff'. You
have to adjust this in the path window when you map the drive. I have not
found a way yet to alter the map once it is created.
Seems stupid that windows vista doesn't use the FQDN for the map, but you
need to use it for the map to be available over a VPN connection. We us VPN
alot since we travel often. I have held up several Vista upgrades until I
could resolve this one.
I hope this helps any of you who have also been frustrated by this problem.
--
Russell Reid
|
|

09-20-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Mapped share access over VPN solution
I had tried that, but apparently i didn't go far enough. I had set the com
suffix in the network adapter DNS append suffix box, but not the full
contoso.com suffix that would resolve the address to a FQDN. I think that
the KB on this solution should be updated with an example. So are you saying
that if i set the DNS suffix to eg. 'contoso.com' that I wouldn't have to map
the drives via FQDN path?
In an aside, this is still very different from the way XP worked. It is an
obscure but critical difference that affects the productivity of my users. I
held up Vista upgrades because of this issue.
--
Russell Reid
"Robert L [MVP - Networking]" wrote:
> Thank you for sharing your experience with us. The other two options are setup WINS or DNS suffix in the client site for NetBIOS name resolution.
>
> Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
> Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net
> How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com
> "Russell Reid" <RussellReid@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:938A3C44-B5EB-42E9-93D2-E191DA89F38D@microsoft.com...
> I have fought this one for months. Mapped drives that worked fine in the
> office were not accessible over a VPN connection. I searched and searched
> for a solution in vain. I tried all of the solutions and hotfixes that
> seemed related: The SMB shares hotfix (kb933468), the route metric hotfix
> (kb930163), deleting cached credentials (cmdkey.exe /delete /ras), remove
> IPv6 for the VPN connection, set the DNS server address explicitly in the
> network adapter settings, etc, etc. To no avail.
>
> Turns out the solution was simple. Map the drive with the fully qualified
> domain name of the server. We map drives via script so this is a fairly easy
> to implement solution. If you map drives via the 'Map Network Drives'
> command in 'Computer' then you have to add the domain suffixes manually when
> you map the drive. So the format of the mapped drive path should look like
> this: '\\server1.contoso.com\fileshares\staff' instead of the default map
> for the same share that looks like this: '\\server1\fileshares\staff'. You
> have to adjust this in the path window when you map the drive. I have not
> found a way yet to alter the map once it is created.
>
> Seems stupid that windows vista doesn't use the FQDN for the map, but you
> need to use it for the map to be available over a VPN connection. We us VPN
> alot since we travel often. I have held up several Vista upgrades until I
> could resolve this one.
>
> I hope this helps any of you who have also been frustrated by this problem.
> --
> Russell Reid
|
|

09-22-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Mapped share access over VPN solution
It is better to setup WINS instead of using DNS suffix because using WINS is setup in the server side while using DNS suffix is in the client side.
Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net
How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com
"Russell Reid" <RussellReid@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4E5823B1-2792-4336-87CD-DE3398E1C587@microsoft.com...
I had tried that, but apparently i didn't go far enough. I had set the com
suffix in the network adapter DNS append suffix box, but not the full
contoso.com suffix that would resolve the address to a FQDN. I think that
the KB on this solution should be updated with an example. So are you saying
that if i set the DNS suffix to eg. 'contoso.com' that I wouldn't have to map
the drives via FQDN path?
In an aside, this is still very different from the way XP worked. It is an
obscure but critical difference that affects the productivity of my users. I
held up Vista upgrades because of this issue.
--
Russell Reid
"Robert L [MVP - Networking]" wrote:
> Thank you for sharing your experience with us. The other two options are setup WINS or DNS suffix in the client site for NetBIOS name resolution.
>
> Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
> Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net
> How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com
> "Russell Reid" <RussellReid@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:938A3C44-B5EB-42E9-93D2-E191DA89F38D@microsoft.com...
> I have fought this one for months. Mapped drives that worked fine in the
> office were not accessible over a VPN connection. I searched and searched
> for a solution in vain. I tried all of the solutions and hotfixes that
> seemed related: The SMB shares hotfix (kb933468), the route metric hotfix
> (kb930163), deleting cached credentials (cmdkey.exe /delete /ras), remove
> IPv6 for the VPN connection, set the DNS server address explicitly in the
> network adapter settings, etc, etc. To no avail.
>
> Turns out the solution was simple. Map the drive with the fully qualified
> domain name of the server. We map drives via script so this is a fairly easy
> to implement solution. If you map drives via the 'Map Network Drives'
> command in 'Computer' then you have to add the domain suffixes manually when
> you map the drive. So the format of the mapped drive path should look like
> this: '\\server1.contoso.com\fileshares\staff' instead of the default map
> for the same share that looks like this: '\\server1\fileshares\staff'. You
> have to adjust this in the path window when you map the drive. I have not
> found a way yet to alter the map once it is created.
>
> Seems stupid that windows vista doesn't use the FQDN for the map, but you
> need to use it for the map to be available over a VPN connection. We us VPN
> alot since we travel often. I have held up several Vista upgrades until I
> could resolve this one.
>
> I hope this helps any of you who have also been frustrated by this problem.
> --
> Russell Reid
|
|

10-01-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Mapped share access over VPN solution
Interesting. We do have WINS setup on our DC. (Server 2003 R2 SP2) Still
had the problem over VPN.
Second, I thought that WINS was no longer required for a Server 2003 network
if you do not have any legacy operating systems. Are you saying that Vista
now requires WINS to function correctly on the network?
--
Russell Reid
"Robert L [MVP - Networking]" wrote:
> It is better to setup WINS instead of using DNS suffix because using WINS is setup in the server side while using DNS suffix is in the client side.
>
> Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
> Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net
> How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com
> "Russell Reid" <RussellReid@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4E5823B1-2792-4336-87CD-DE3398E1C587@microsoft.com...
> I had tried that, but apparently i didn't go far enough. I had set the com
> suffix in the network adapter DNS append suffix box, but not the full
> contoso.com suffix that would resolve the address to a FQDN. I think that
> the KB on this solution should be updated with an example. So are you saying
> that if i set the DNS suffix to eg. 'contoso.com' that I wouldn't have to map
> the drives via FQDN path?
>
> In an aside, this is still very different from the way XP worked. It is an
> obscure but critical difference that affects the productivity of my users. I
> held up Vista upgrades because of this issue.
> --
> Russell Reid
>
>
> "Robert L [MVP - Networking]" wrote:
>
> > Thank you for sharing your experience with us. The other two options are setup WINS or DNS suffix in the client site for NetBIOS name resolution.
> >
> > Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
> > Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net
> > How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com
> > "Russell Reid" <RussellReid@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:938A3C44-B5EB-42E9-93D2-E191DA89F38D@microsoft.com...
> > I have fought this one for months. Mapped drives that worked fine in the
> > office were not accessible over a VPN connection. I searched and searched
> > for a solution in vain. I tried all of the solutions and hotfixes that
> > seemed related: The SMB shares hotfix (kb933468), the route metric hotfix
> > (kb930163), deleting cached credentials (cmdkey.exe /delete /ras), remove
> > IPv6 for the VPN connection, set the DNS server address explicitly in the
> > network adapter settings, etc, etc. To no avail.
> >
> > Turns out the solution was simple. Map the drive with the fully qualified
> > domain name of the server. We map drives via script so this is a fairly easy
> > to implement solution. If you map drives via the 'Map Network Drives'
> > command in 'Computer' then you have to add the domain suffixes manually when
> > you map the drive. So the format of the mapped drive path should look like
> > this: '\\server1.contoso.com\fileshares\staff' instead of the default map
> > for the same share that looks like this: '\\server1\fileshares\staff'. You
> > have to adjust this in the path window when you map the drive. I have not
> > found a way yet to alter the map once it is created.
> >
> > Seems stupid that windows vista doesn't use the FQDN for the map, but you
> > need to use it for the map to be available over a VPN connection. We us VPN
> > alot since we travel often. I have held up several Vista upgrades until I
> > could resolve this one.
> >
> > I hope this helps any of you who have also been frustrated by this problem.
> > --
> > Russell Reid
|
|

10-01-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: Mapped share access over VPN solution
As said, it is better to use WINS for VPN. Otherwise, you may do DNS suffix.
This link may give more information about WINS.
Does Windows 2000/2003 domain needs WINSDoes Windows 2000/2003 domain needs
WINS. Q1: Is there a definitive list of the services and operations that
will no longer work in Windows 2003 Server if ...
www.howtonetworking.com/server/wins1.htm
--
Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on
http://www.ChicagoTech.net
How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on
http://www.HowToNetworking.com
"Russell Reid" <RussellReid@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2AABEC88-0293-45C5-BB25-1B495B85CF02@microsoft.com...
> Interesting. We do have WINS setup on our DC. (Server 2003 R2 SP2)
> Still
> had the problem over VPN.
> Second, I thought that WINS was no longer required for a Server 2003
> network
> if you do not have any legacy operating systems. Are you saying that
> Vista
> now requires WINS to function correctly on the network?
> --
> Russell Reid
>
>
> "Robert L [MVP - Networking]" wrote:
>
>> It is better to setup WINS instead of using DNS suffix because using WINS
>> is setup in the server side while using DNS suffix is in the client side.
>>
>> Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
>> Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on
>> http://www.ChicagoTech.net
>> How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on
>> http://www.HowToNetworking.com
>> "Russell Reid" <RussellReid@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:4E5823B1-2792-4336-87CD-DE3398E1C587@microsoft.com...
>> I had tried that, but apparently i didn't go far enough. I had set the
>> com
>> suffix in the network adapter DNS append suffix box, but not the full
>> contoso.com suffix that would resolve the address to a FQDN. I think
>> that
>> the KB on this solution should be updated with an example. So are you
>> saying
>> that if i set the DNS suffix to eg. 'contoso.com' that I wouldn't have
>> to map
>> the drives via FQDN path?
>>
>> In an aside, this is still very different from the way XP worked. It
>> is an
>> obscure but critical difference that affects the productivity of my
>> users. I
>> held up Vista upgrades because of this issue.
>> --
>> Russell Reid
>>
>>
>> "Robert L [MVP - Networking]" wrote:
>>
>> > Thank you for sharing your experience with us. The other two options
>> are setup WINS or DNS suffix in the client site for NetBIOS name
>> resolution.
>> >
>> > Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
>> > Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on
>> http://www.ChicagoTech.net
>> > How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on
>> http://www.HowToNetworking.com
>> > "Russell Reid" <RussellReid@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
>> message news:938A3C44-B5EB-42E9-93D2-E191DA89F38D@microsoft.com...
>> > I have fought this one for months. Mapped drives that worked fine
>> in the
>> > office were not accessible over a VPN connection. I searched and
>> searched
>> > for a solution in vain. I tried all of the solutions and hotfixes
>> that
>> > seemed related: The SMB shares hotfix (kb933468), the route metric
>> hotfix
>> > (kb930163), deleting cached credentials (cmdkey.exe /delete /ras),
>> remove
>> > IPv6 for the VPN connection, set the DNS server address explicitly
>> in the
>> > network adapter settings, etc, etc. To no avail.
>> >
>> > Turns out the solution was simple. Map the drive with the fully
>> qualified
>> > domain name of the server. We map drives via script so this is a
>> fairly easy
>> > to implement solution. If you map drives via the 'Map Network
>> Drives'
>> > command in 'Computer' then you have to add the domain suffixes
>> manually when
>> > you map the drive. So the format of the mapped drive path should
>> look like
>> > this: '\\server1.contoso.com\fileshares\staff' instead of the
>> default map
>> > for the same share that looks like this:
>> '\\server1\fileshares\staff'. You
>> > have to adjust this in the path window when you map the drive. I
>> have not
>> > found a way yet to alter the map once it is created.
>> >
>> > Seems stupid that windows vista doesn't use the FQDN for the map,
>> but you
>> > need to use it for the map to be available over a VPN connection.
>> We us VPN
>> > alot since we travel often. I have held up several Vista upgrades
>> until I
>> > could resolve this one.
>> >
>> > I hope this helps any of you who have also been frustrated by this
>> problem.
>> > --
>> > Russell Reid
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35.
|
|