Re: Copying pictures multiple times
I would not expect that changing the file name would increase the size, but
neither operation should affect the contents (i.e. quality).
Using Windows Live Photo Gallery to 'set' the date picture taken if there
was no such entry in the original picture would increase the size as it
added a block to store that new data. (note that if there is no actual date
picture taken then the date created is used as a surrogate.) I have not
noticed increases in file sizes you are seeing, but then I have never looked
"Jorge131" <Jorge131@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> Thanks for the clarification.
> Then, I would also assume that if I modify the date the pictures were
> or if I rename files (In groups of pictures as Windows Live allows), there
> no quality loss either. I tried doing this with some pictures and I
> the files actually increased their size in 3-4 KB.
> Would you concur with my assumption?
> "Michael Walraven" wrote:
>> Copying will not have any effect on the quality of a JPG image. You may
>> confused with advice not to open a JPG then save it, this in general will
>> degrade the picture. (opening converts the JPG into a display format -
>> basically a bit map -, if it then converts it back into another JPG there
>> will be loss of quality.)
>> "Jorge131" <Jorge131@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> > Hello All,
>> > So if I copy my pictures (JPEG) from CD #1 to CD #2 and then from CD #2
>> > to
>> > CD #3, would that possibly mean that my pictures in CD # 3 have less
>> > quality
>> > than my pictures in CD #1. Does the copying process could affect the
>> > quality
>> > of the pictures in the long term.
>> > Thanks a lot for your reply
>> > --
>> > JF