"Colin Barnhorst" wrote:
> I don't believe that you can just change the drive letter of the system
> drive.
Not once it's installed. I noticed that during installation (after first
reboot) there were two files in the root: "$driveletter$" and "$systemdrive$"
(if memory serves). The first one had the registry ID and the physical letter
of the drive where I was installing, while the other was empty. Presumably
that's what needs to be changed. But I'm only guessing.
> There could be way too many registry changes needed. Why do you
> feel you need to make this change? Each of your OSs will function fine the
> way they are set up. In a multiboot configuration I name the partitions
> according to the OS so that I have no trouble knowing which partition is
> which OS. When I am testing on my test box, Windows Explorer will show that
> C: is named "VUx64 (C
", D: might be "VHPx86 (D
" and so on.
I want the drive letters to follow physical order. Right now I need to start
Disk Management to really see what's where. Also, when I switch OSes I have
to constantly mentally readjust (this "C:" I'm running now is not the same as
that "C:" I was running just minutes ago, etc). It's an unnecessary
complication and a mess.
Not to mention I have 2 internal drives (a notebook) and due to historical
(hysterical) reasons Windows assigns drives out of order which just adds to
the confusion i.e. 1st partition on 1st drive, then 1st partition on 2nd
drive, then the rest of partitions on 1st drive, then the rest of partitions
on 2nd drive, and so on. That's bad enough so I don't want to complicate
matters even more.
I do have a naming convention e.g. "0.1: HP clean" where "0" is drive and
"1" is the partition and it annoys the hell out of me that each time I start
a different OS the order in the Explorer is all messed up just because
Windows insists that the currently running version must be assigned to C:.
As I say, on my old system, I was able to install W2K on drive D: without
any problems and when W2K comes up its drive was still D:.