Vista will not recognize an existing RAID

I am running a dual boot system, XP and Vista. See below for system
components.

I have been using the Windows XP OS with two RAID 1 arrays with no problems.
The arrays were created using the BIOS, and XP was installed with the Intel
RAID drivers (via floppy during initial setup). For the two arrays to
accessed (read/write) I found I had to use XP's Disk Management utility and
convert the arrays to "Basic Disks". I was not worried about the warning of
loosing data on either array as they were blank, no data.

I recently installed Windows Vista, and found this OS will not recognize the
two existing RAID arrays. I can not see either arrays with "My Computer" nor
with "Windows Explorer". Therefore I can neither read nor write to these
RAID arrays.

Please note my system has 6 hard drives. One for XP. One for Vista. Two
hard drives for the first RAID 1 array. And two hard drives for the second
RAID 1 array. The two RAID volumes store data only. I do not want to loose
the data stored on these two RAID volumes.

Under the Vista environment, Intel's Matrix Storage Manager sees the two
arrays as functioning normally.

Conversely, Vista's Disk Management utility sees these two arrays as
"Dynamic" and as "Invalid". A right-click on the disk icon gives the option
"Convert to Basic Disk". This option says that to continue will destroy all
data on the disk. This is something I do not want to happen.

I'm stuck. Can Vista be made to recognize the existing RAID arrays without
loosing the data stored on these arrays?


Vistaâ„¢ Home Premium v6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001
Motherboard: P5K Premium with Intel P35/ICH9R chipset
Processor: Intel Core2 Duo E6850 CPU @ 3.00GHz
BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. version 0504, 12/10/2007
SMBIOS Version 2.4
RAM: 4.00 GB

Description: Disk drive (320Gb hard drive)
Manufacturer: Seagate
Name: SG320_S1
Usage: Windows XP OS

Description: Disk drive (320Gb hard drive)
Manufacturer: Seagate
Name: SG320_S2
Usage: Windows Vista OS

Description: RAID 1 volume (2 mirrored 500Gb hard drives)
Manufacturer: Western Digital
Name: WD500_01
Usage: data storage only

Description: RAID 1 volume (2 mirrored 500Gb hard drives)
Manufacturer: Seagate
Name: SG500_02
Usage: data storage only

Intel Matrix Storage Manager v7.8.0.1013

I'm not sure of how to resolve this but one thing I have done with RAID 1
arrays in the past was to break the mirror (remove one disk) and then
experiment with the remaining disk. If all works, then install the other disk
and rebuild the array. If not then you still can rebuild the array with the
removed disk back to normal using the XP system. (Intel rebuilds from the
lowest drive number,i.e. from disk 0 to disk 1 so you have to move the good
disk to the lowest position).
--
Paul


"Larry" wrote:

> I am running a dual boot system, XP and Vista. See below for system
> components.
>
> I have been using the Windows XP OS with two RAID 1 arrays with no problems.
> The arrays were created using the BIOS, and XP was installed with the Intel
> RAID drivers (via floppy during initial setup). For the two arrays to
> accessed (read/write) I found I had to use XP's Disk Management utility and
> convert the arrays to "Basic Disks". I was not worried about the warning of
> loosing data on either array as they were blank, no data.
>
> I recently installed Windows Vista, and found this OS will not recognize the
> two existing RAID arrays. I can not see either arrays with "My Computer" nor
> with "Windows Explorer". Therefore I can neither read nor write to these
> RAID arrays.
>
> Please note my system has 6 hard drives. One for XP. One for Vista. Two
> hard drives for the first RAID 1 array. And two hard drives for the second
> RAID 1 array. The two RAID volumes store data only. I do not want to loose
> the data stored on these two RAID volumes.
>
> Under the Vista environment, Intel's Matrix Storage Manager sees the two
> arrays as functioning normally.
>
> Conversely, Vista's Disk Management utility sees these two arrays as
> "Dynamic" and as "Invalid". A right-click on the disk icon gives the option
> "Convert to Basic Disk". This option says that to continue will destroy all
> data on the disk. This is something I do not want to happen.
>
> I'm stuck. Can Vista be made to recognize the existing RAID arrays without
> loosing the data stored on these arrays?
>
>
> Vistaâ„¢ Home Premium v6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001
> Motherboard: P5K Premium with Intel P35/ICH9R chipset
> Processor: Intel Core2 Duo E6850 CPU @ 3.00GHz
> BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. version 0504, 12/10/2007
> SMBIOS Version 2.4
> RAM: 4.00 GB
>
> Description: Disk drive (320Gb hard drive)
> Manufacturer: Seagate
> Name: SG320_S1
> Usage: Windows XP OS
>
> Description: Disk drive (320Gb hard drive)
> Manufacturer: Seagate
> Name: SG320_S2
> Usage: Windows Vista OS
>
> Description: RAID 1 volume (2 mirrored 500Gb hard drives)
> Manufacturer: Western Digital
> Name: WD500_01
> Usage: data storage only
>
> Description: RAID 1 volume (2 mirrored 500Gb hard drives)
> Manufacturer: Seagate
> Name: SG500_02
> Usage: data storage only
>
> Intel Matrix Storage Manager v7.8.0.1013
>

On thing more, you did install the RAID drivers on the VISTA system, correct?
--
Paul


"Larry" wrote:

> I am running a dual boot system, XP and Vista. See below for system
> components.
>
> I have been using the Windows XP OS with two RAID 1 arrays with no problems.
> The arrays were created using the BIOS, and XP was installed with the Intel
> RAID drivers (via floppy during initial setup). For the two arrays to
> accessed (read/write) I found I had to use XP's Disk Management utility and
> convert the arrays to "Basic Disks". I was not worried about the warning of
> loosing data on either array as they were blank, no data.
>
> I recently installed Windows Vista, and found this OS will not recognize the
> two existing RAID arrays. I can not see either arrays with "My Computer" nor
> with "Windows Explorer". Therefore I can neither read nor write to these
> RAID arrays.
>
> Please note my system has 6 hard drives. One for XP. One for Vista. Two
> hard drives for the first RAID 1 array. And two hard drives for the second
> RAID 1 array. The two RAID volumes store data only. I do not want to loose
> the data stored on these two RAID volumes.
>
> Under the Vista environment, Intel's Matrix Storage Manager sees the two
> arrays as functioning normally.
>
> Conversely, Vista's Disk Management utility sees these two arrays as
> "Dynamic" and as "Invalid". A right-click on the disk icon gives the option
> "Convert to Basic Disk". This option says that to continue will destroy all
> data on the disk. This is something I do not want to happen.
>
> I'm stuck. Can Vista be made to recognize the existing RAID arrays without
> loosing the data stored on these arrays?
>
>
> Vistaâ„¢ Home Premium v6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001
> Motherboard: P5K Premium with Intel P35/ICH9R chipset
> Processor: Intel Core2 Duo E6850 CPU @ 3.00GHz
> BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. version 0504, 12/10/2007
> SMBIOS Version 2.4
> RAM: 4.00 GB
>
> Description: Disk drive (320Gb hard drive)
> Manufacturer: Seagate
> Name: SG320_S1
> Usage: Windows XP OS
>
> Description: Disk drive (320Gb hard drive)
> Manufacturer: Seagate
> Name: SG320_S2
> Usage: Windows Vista OS
>
> Description: RAID 1 volume (2 mirrored 500Gb hard drives)
> Manufacturer: Western Digital
> Name: WD500_01
> Usage: data storage only
>
> Description: RAID 1 volume (2 mirrored 500Gb hard drives)
> Manufacturer: Seagate
> Name: SG500_02
> Usage: data storage only
>
> Intel Matrix Storage Manager v7.8.0.1013
>

On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:53:00 -0700, PaulB
<PaulB@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>On thing more, you did install the RAID drivers on the VISTA system, correct?

Hi PaulB,

First off, thank you for replying and considering my dilemma.

I'm positive that I did install the RAID drivers on the VISTA system
even though I don't remember doing it. The VISTA install was the
first and only install.

When I initially started using the RAID feature of the motherboard
under XP, I became very aware of the procedure and need to install the
Intel RAID drivers. Thus I am positive I carried over this care when
I installed Vista.

I must admit your suggestion of removing one of the drives in the
array and experiementing with the remaining disk is intriguing, but it
scares me. In the end, that might be the last resort, and hopefully
the Disk Management utility will not destroy the data.

It amazes me Vista will not recognize the existing RAID arrays created
in XP. Vista sees the other non RAID hard drives and the data thereon
can be accessed, but not the RAID volumes.

I was hoping the answer might be something simple, such as registry
entry edit. Ah well...

Thanks again.

Larry

Hi Larry,
You are welcome. I use a RAID 1 array with an Intel ICH5R and after
installing the XP drivers (none avaliable for Vista) it was usable in Vista.
I also only use it for data and not the operating system. I multi boot XP as
well.
--
Paul


"seafun@bc.com" wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:53:00 -0700, PaulB
> <PaulB@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >On thing more, you did install the RAID drivers on the VISTA system, correct?
>
> Hi PaulB,
>
> First off, thank you for replying and considering my dilemma.
>
> I'm positive that I did install the RAID drivers on the VISTA system
> even though I don't remember doing it. The VISTA install was the
> first and only install.
>
> When I initially started using the RAID feature of the motherboard
> under XP, I became very aware of the procedure and need to install the
> Intel RAID drivers. Thus I am positive I carried over this care when
> I installed Vista.
>
> I must admit your suggestion of removing one of the drives in the
> array and experiementing with the remaining disk is intriguing, but it
> scares me. In the end, that might be the last resort, and hopefully
> the Disk Management utility will not destroy the data.
>
> It amazes me Vista will not recognize the existing RAID arrays created
> in XP. Vista sees the other non RAID hard drives and the data thereon
> can be accessed, but not the RAID volumes.
>
> I was hoping the answer might be something simple, such as registry
> entry edit. Ah well...
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Larry
>