
08-07-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: ANother dual boot question
Thank you John. That's what I needed to know!
Vic
"John Barnes" <jbarnes@email.net> wrote in message
news:ucpe4JR2HHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
> "Vic Baron" <vgbaron@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uGrRRkQ2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Been reading everything I can on dual booting XPPro & Vista and must say
>> that I am thoroughly confused.
>>
>> Basically, this is the situation - I am constructing a new system. I have
>> XPPro and Vista Home Premium - both OEM versions.
>>
>> I want to set it up this way
>>
>> 1 - 320G SATA HD - 3 partitions - 80G XP Pro - 80G Vista - 160G Programs
>>
>> 2 - 74G SATA Raptors in RAID 0 for gaming and graphics
>>
>> 1 - 500G SATA hd as backup
>>
>> 1 - SATA DVD Burner
>>
>> Considering that I have the OEM versions( purchased legitimately) that
>> look for a blank disk will that cause me problems after I have installed
>> one OS?
>
> Blank partition, not disk. No problem
>>
>> Would it be possible to set up the dual boot so the current system drive
>> is always "C" and program drive is "D", if so, how?
>
> Make your XP (make active) and Vista drives primary partition and the
> Programs drive a logical drive within an extended partition. Easiest way
> is install XP first (which you should do anyway) then Vista. Make sure
> your 320G sata drive is first in boot priority when you do this, that way
> XP will be your system drive in both systems and you can then re-letter
> all your other drives as you want them, and both XP and Vista will be C.
>>
>> What would be the best procedure to follow for dual boot installation -XP
>> first or Vista?
>
> See above.
>>
>> Since programs will be installed on the 3rd partition, how can I install
>> them so that each OS sees them correctly?
>
> They have to be installed from the system you are going to use them on,
> and if both systems, you need to install them to the same directory from
> both systems.
>>
>>
>> Thanx,
>>
>> Vic Baron
>>
>>
>> --
>> There are 10 kinds of people - those who understand binary and those who
>> don't
>>
>
|