Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
|
|
What bunch of dipstics wrote this crap?
microsoft.public.windows.vista hardware devices
|
|

01-14-2008
|
|
|
|
What bunch of dipstics wrote this crap?
PC effectively dies with Trusted Installer taking
100% of CPU.
It doesn't appear to do anything useful, only
act like a virus.
What's it doing?
How do I get rid of it?
|
|

01-15-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: What bunch of dipstics wrote this crap?
Trusted installer installs, of course, like updates and stuff. It is
scheduled to act periodically in the background. Since you are so hysterical
at 100% CPU usage and apt to get rid of stuff you don't even know what it
does, you have probably already rendered your system unusable with a cascade
of unintended consequences due to your own ignorant acts, so who knows why
your trusted installer can no longer be trusted.
Start with the event viewer and read what is occurring at the times your
mal-trusted installer is doing its thing.
<ato_zee@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:478bcd5f$0$21104$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
> PC effectively dies with Trusted Installer taking
> 100% of CPU.
> It doesn't appear to do anything useful, only
> act like a virus.
> What's it doing?
> How do I get rid of it?
|
|

01-15-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: What bunch of dipstics wrote this crap?
> It is
> scheduled to act periodically in the background.
But written by dipsticks, it takes 100% CPU, so the
PC goes into rigor mortis mode, which is definately
not acting periodically in the background.
More like it is acting in the foreground. Surely
any competent programmer, and MS don't seem
to have any, would program in around 30% CPU
max.
|
|

01-15-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: What bunch of dipstics wrote this crap?
ato_zee@hotmail.com wrote:
>>It is
>>scheduled to act periodically in the background.
>
>
> But written by dipsticks, it takes 100% CPU, so the
> PC goes into rigor mortis mode, which is definately
> not acting periodically in the background.
> More like it is acting in the foreground. Surely
> any competent programmer, and MS don't seem
> to have any, would program in around 30% CPU
> max.
hahaha...now we're getting somewhere...so you think you're a
"programmer" right...LOL!
Frank
|
|

01-15-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: What bunch of dipstics wrote this crap?
Then it isn't 100% CPU that has you upset, but your machine is freezing up.
I often get 100% usage and my PC is still perfectly responsive because of
task priority. This has nothing to do with CPU percentage. Anyway, your
machine is messed up, and given the tone and acumen of your post and
unreasonable need to place blame elsewhere rather than find a solution, is
probably due to your own actions.
<ato_zee@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:478bf422$0$21099$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
>
>> It is
>> scheduled to act periodically in the background.
>
> But written by dipsticks, it takes 100% CPU, so the
> PC goes into rigor mortis mode, which is definately
> not acting periodically in the background.
> More like it is acting in the foreground. Surely
> any competent programmer, and MS don't seem
> to have any, would program in around 30% CPU
> max.
|
|

01-15-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: What bunch of dipstics wrote this crap?
Have you ever tried right clicking on my computer, and opening it, then click
on you hard drive then properties, and do a disk clean up, might help, in
getting what not needed old cookies and temp files that's not needed anymore.
--
Robyn
"Cameron Snyder" wrote:
> Then it isn't 100% CPU that has you upset, but your machine is freezing up.
> I often get 100% usage and my PC is still perfectly responsive because of
> task priority. This has nothing to do with CPU percentage. Anyway, your
> machine is messed up, and given the tone and acumen of your post and
> unreasonable need to place blame elsewhere rather than find a solution, is
> probably due to your own actions.
>
>
> <ato_zee@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:478bf422$0$21099$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
> >
> >> It is
> >> scheduled to act periodically in the background.
> >
> > But written by dipsticks, it takes 100% CPU, so the
> > PC goes into rigor mortis mode, which is definately
> > not acting periodically in the background.
> > More like it is acting in the foreground. Surely
> > any competent programmer, and MS don't seem
> > to have any, would program in around 30% CPU
> > max.
>
>
|
|

01-15-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: What bunch of dipstics wrote this crap?
> Then it isn't 100% CPU that has you upset, but your machine is freezing
> up.
> I often get 100% usage and my PC is still perfectly responsive because of
> task priority. This has nothing to do with CPU percentage.
Only problem is I'm trying to get some work done, with 100% CPU and
a PC with rigor mortis, Excel macros also have rigor mortis, since
Excel macros also demand 100% CPU.
MS just don't seem to have any competent programmers, they
can't even make Excel a 64 bit program.
MS seem totally incompetent in most areas.
Their WGA server going down and crippling legitimate
machines is just another example.
Surely for a critical server you have a backup server.
|
|

01-15-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: What bunch of dipstics wrote this crap?
<ato_zee@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:478c7d90$0$8418$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk...
>
>> Then it isn't 100% CPU that has you upset, but your machine is freezing
>> up.
>> I often get 100% usage and my PC is still perfectly responsive because of
>> task priority. This has nothing to do with CPU percentage.
>
> Only problem is I'm trying to get some work done, with 100% CPU and
> a PC with rigor mortis, Excel macros also have rigor mortis, since
> Excel macros also demand 100% CPU.
> MS just don't seem to have any competent programmers, they
> can't even make Excel a 64 bit program.
> MS seem totally incompetent in most areas.
> Their WGA server going down and crippling legitimate
> machines is just another example.
> Surely for a critical server you have a backup server.
Funny, I never have those problems. And AGAIN, check your facts about the
server crash. Don't you think that IF the server had been doing that it
would have garnered more press, especially from the smacktards? Funny that
the ONLY mention of a problem says August of 2007. Perhaps you should wait
until you know what you are talking about before posting.
--
Sanity calms, but madness is more interesting.
http://www.lockergnome.com/darksentinel
Undo the munge to reply by email
|
|

01-15-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: What bunch of dipstics wrote this crap?
<ato_zee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:478bcd5f$0$21104$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
> PC effectively dies with Trusted Installer taking
> 100% of CPU.
> It doesn't appear to do anything useful, only
> act like a virus.
> What's it doing?
> How do I get rid of it?
If you haven't immediately installed any programs, you can kill it.
Supposedly, Trusted Installer has to do with Add/Remove
and optional components. It's Service name is "Windows Modules Installer".
However, when you check the dependencies for that Service,
none are listed.
Go into Admin Tools>Services and find "Windows Modules Installer".
Be sure it is set to "Manual". Stop it if it is causing problems.
You could also right-click on the process name -> set priority -> below normal
http://www.speedyvista.com/services/..._Installer.php
-Michael
|
|

01-16-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: What bunch of dipstics wrote this crap?
LOL you could get a REAL OS WINDOWS XP PRO.
not that over priced pice of crap window dressing called VISTA.
--
AL'S COMPUTERS
"MICHAEL" <u158627_7@dslr.net> wrote in message
news:#z81qM4VIHA.4712@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> <ato_zee@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:478bcd5f$0$21104$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
> > PC effectively dies with Trusted Installer taking
> > 100% of CPU.
> > It doesn't appear to do anything useful, only
> > act like a virus.
> > What's it doing?
> > How do I get rid of it?
>
> If you haven't immediately installed any programs, you can kill it.
> Supposedly, Trusted Installer has to do with Add/Remove
> and optional components. It's Service name is "Windows Modules
Installer".
> However, when you check the dependencies for that Service,
> none are listed.
>
> Go into Admin Tools>Services and find "Windows Modules Installer".
> Be sure it is set to "Manual". Stop it if it is causing problems.
>
> You could also right-click on the process name -> set priority -> below
normal
>
> http://www.speedyvista.com/services/..._Installer.php
>
>
> -Michael
>
>
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:00.
|
|