Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads
Recommended Download - Clean, repair and optimize your system



Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now

Windows Experience Index

microsoft.public.windows.vista hardware devices




Recommended Fix - Fix Vista Errors and Optimize Performance

Click On Your Flag for Translation
Simplified Chinese French Spanish Italian Portugeuse Japanese German Dutch
Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now
Reply
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-26-2007
marvin
 

Posts: n/a
Windows Experience Index
I have an Acer Aspire 5100 running Home Premium. My computer (laptop) has an
AMD Turion 64 MK-36 processor and ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 graphics. At the
time of purchase, my system had 1gb RAM installed. I have since upgraded the
RAM to 3gb (2gb + 1gb). Prior to the 3gb upgrade, i had a previous upgrade
where I upgraded the initial 1gb to 2gb (2 x 1gb). At the time of the 2gb
upgrade , my WEI was for graphics, and subsequently, for my whole system was
3.1. The RAM installed is DDR2 PC5300 (667mhz). When I installed the 2gb
module (bringing system memory to 3gb), the WEI dropped to 2.4. I really
didn't think it that big of a deal, except that I lost some functions in
Photo Gallery and Media Center (transition effects). I was told that having
different manufacturer RAM modules is not the sticking point; rather that as
long as both RAM modules are the same frequency then there wouldn't be any
performance degradation. Now I am beginning to believe different. Do I in
fact need to have same manufacturer, as well as frequency, to bring my WEI
score back up and regain that functionality that I have lost?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-26-2007
marvin
 

Posts: n/a
RE: Windows Experience Index


"marvin" wrote:

> I have an Acer Aspire 5100 running Home Premium. My computer (laptop) has an
> AMD Turion 64 MK-36 processor and ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 graphics. At the
> time of purchase, my system had 1gb RAM installed. I have since upgraded the
> RAM to 3gb (2gb + 1gb). Prior to the 3gb upgrade, i had a previous upgrade
> where I upgraded the initial 1gb to 2gb (2 x 1gb). At the time of the 2gb
> upgrade , my WEI was for graphics, and subsequently, for my whole system was
> 3.1. The RAM installed is DDR2 PC5300 (667mhz). When I installed the 2gb
> module (bringing system memory to 3gb), the WEI dropped to 2.4. I really
> didn't think it that big of a deal, except that I lost some functions in
> Photo Gallery and Media Center (transition effects). I was told that having
> different manufacturer RAM modules is not the sticking point; rather that as
> long as both RAM modules are the same frequency then there wouldn't be any
> performance degradation. Now I am beginning to believe different. Do I in
> fact need to have same manufacturer, as well as frequency, to bring my WEI
> score back up and regain that functionality that I have lost?

And let me add that I have tried to update my score configuring my computer
in various ways: changing/disabling indexing, changing display setting
(resolution, special effects, etc.), and changing the graphics card settings.
I have all drivers updated as well.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007
marvin
 

Posts: n/a
RE: Windows Experience Index
what i did was to replace the 1gb module with another 1gb module from the
same manufacturer. my index rose to 3.0 (it was 3.1 when there was only 2gb
installed). i'm not crying about the .1. thanks for the help marvin
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows Experience Index hpceman microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 2 08-04-2007 17:41
Windows experience index =?Utf-8?B?cmV0aXJlZA==?= microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 2 04-04-2007 14:23
Windows Experience Index =?Utf-8?B?bWljaGFlbCBi?= microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 3 03-18-2007 17:21
Windows Experience Index no spam microsoft.public.windows.vista hardware devices 3 03-14-2007 08:46
Windows Experience Index Pete138 microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance maintenance 0 03-09-2007 19:10




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:09.




Driver Scanner - Free Scan Now

Vistaheads.com is part of the Heads Network. See also XPHeads.com and Win7Heads.com.


Funny Commercials to make you laugh :-)

Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119