Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads
Recommended Download - Clean, repair and optimize your system



Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

x86 vs x64

microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware assessment




Recommended Fix - Fix Vista Errors and Optimize Performance

Click On Your Flag for Translation
Simplified Chinese French Spanish Italian Portugeuse Japanese German Dutch
Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now
Reply
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2009
db
 

Posts: n/a
Re: x86 vs x64
greetings from the US!

ok, thanks for the information.

so is it your opinion or in
your experience that if I
chose to run a 64 bit o.s.

I wouldn't have any
problems?

----------

I'm was just going by what the
kb from microsoft expressed.

that the determination to run
32 bit or 64 bit could be found
in that line entry under the
environment.



--
db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
DatabaseBen, Retired Professional
- Systems Analyst
- Database Developer
- Accountancy
- Veteran of the Armed Forces
- @Hotmail.com

"share the nirvana mann" - dbZen

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>


"Oliver Aichinger" <o.aichinger@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news8A84417-D20B-4EE7-AF85-37D145698006@microsoft.com...
>
> "db" <databaseben@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:O14kUGnIKHA.4236@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> hello,
>>
>> I have a question regarding
>> hardware.
>>
>> recently, I was considering
>> upgrading from 32 bit to
>> 64 bit vista and looked into
>> the alternate media aspect
>> of microsoft sales & replacements:
>>
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/326246
>>
>> I went to double check what
>> my system stated via system>
>> advanced>enviroment>
>> system variables>processor
>> id.
>>
>> the line states x86 which implies
>> 32 bit processor.
>>
>> however, my processor is
>> actually a 64 bit quad core
>> on a compatiable mobo.
>>
>> so the processor id should
>> state x64.
>>
>> so why is there a difference
>> in what the properties state
>> to the cpu box I have in my
>> hand.
>>
>> thanks for any fyi.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
>> DatabaseBen, Retired Professional
>> - Systems Analyst
>> - Database Developer
>> - Accountancy
>> - Veteran of the Armed Forces
>> - @Hotmail.com
>>
>> "share the nirvana mann" - dbZen
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>>

>
> What you see there has nothing to do with a 32 or 64 bit system. x86
> refers to the Intel x86 CPU family which could also be 64-Bit CPU.
> For more information see
> http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_te...i=54979,00.asp
>
> Many greetings from Germany
>
> Oliver


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2009
Oliver Aichinger
 

Posts: n/a
Re: x86 vs x64
This my opinion.
I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate as a 32bit installation (US Version)
on my PC and I also use a system similar to yours.
When I have a look at the System Environment variables I get the same result
as you got.

I'm going for a 64Bit installation as soon as Windows 7 Upgrade Version is
available in Europe or US.
Unfortunately I need a US Version to upgrade my system. Otherwise the
upgrade will fail because the base system language is English.
It's rather difficult to get a US Version of a Windows OS in Germany.

Nevertheless, if a 64Bit OS should not run on this system (what I don't
belive), I bring it back where I bought it. Because in this case it is not
what the supplier had promised me.


"db" <databaseben@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:eOebqSlJKHA.5956@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> greetings from the US!
>
> ok, thanks for the information.
>
> so is it your opinion or in
> your experience that if I
> chose to run a 64 bit o.s.
>
> I wouldn't have any
> problems?
>
> ----------
>
> I'm was just going by what the
> kb from microsoft expressed.
>
> that the determination to run
> 32 bit or 64 bit could be found
> in that line entry under the
> environment.
>
>
>
> --
> db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
> DatabaseBen, Retired Professional
> - Systems Analyst
> - Database Developer
> - Accountancy
> - Veteran of the Armed Forces
> - @Hotmail.com
>
> "share the nirvana mann" - dbZen
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>

>
> "Oliver Aichinger" <o.aichinger@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> news8A84417-D20B-4EE7-AF85-37D145698006@microsoft.com...
>>
>> "db" <databaseben@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>> news:O14kUGnIKHA.4236@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> I have a question regarding
>>> hardware.
>>>
>>> recently, I was considering
>>> upgrading from 32 bit to
>>> 64 bit vista and looked into
>>> the alternate media aspect
>>> of microsoft sales & replacements:
>>>
>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/326246
>>>
>>> I went to double check what
>>> my system stated via system>
>>> advanced>enviroment>
>>> system variables>processor
>>> id.
>>>
>>> the line states x86 which implies
>>> 32 bit processor.
>>>
>>> however, my processor is
>>> actually a 64 bit quad core
>>> on a compatiable mobo.
>>>
>>> so the processor id should
>>> state x64.
>>>
>>> so why is there a difference
>>> in what the properties state
>>> to the cpu box I have in my
>>> hand.
>>>
>>> thanks for any fyi.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
>>> DatabaseBen, Retired Professional
>>> - Systems Analyst
>>> - Database Developer
>>> - Accountancy
>>> - Veteran of the Armed Forces
>>> - @Hotmail.com
>>>
>>> "share the nirvana mann" - dbZen
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>>

>>
>> What you see there has nothing to do with a 32 or 64 bit system. x86
>> refers to the Intel x86 CPU family which could also be 64-Bit CPU.
>> For more information see
>> http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_te...i=54979,00.asp
>>
>> Many greetings from Germany
>>
>> Oliver

>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2009
db
 

Posts: n/a
Re: x86 vs x64
I see.

thanks for taking the time
to provide some help.

well, if you need me to
send you a box of win7

let me know.

--
db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
DatabaseBen, Retired Professional
- Systems Analyst
- Database Developer
- Accountancy
- Veteran of the Armed Forces
- @Hotmail.com

"share the nirvana mann" - dbZen

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>


"Oliver Aichinger" <o.aichinger@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:A999C01A-68DE-4DCD-8BEF-D2D0C00C653C@microsoft.com...
> This my opinion.
> I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate as a 32bit installation (US
> Version) on my PC and I also use a system similar to yours.
> When I have a look at the System Environment variables I get the same
> result as you got.
>
> I'm going for a 64Bit installation as soon as Windows 7 Upgrade Version is
> available in Europe or US.
> Unfortunately I need a US Version to upgrade my system. Otherwise the
> upgrade will fail because the base system language is English.
> It's rather difficult to get a US Version of a Windows OS in Germany.
>
> Nevertheless, if a 64Bit OS should not run on this system (what I don't
> belive), I bring it back where I bought it. Because in this case it is not
> what the supplier had promised me.
>
>
> "db" <databaseben@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:eOebqSlJKHA.5956@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> greetings from the US!
>>
>> ok, thanks for the information.
>>
>> so is it your opinion or in
>> your experience that if I
>> chose to run a 64 bit o.s.
>>
>> I wouldn't have any
>> problems?
>>
>> ----------
>>
>> I'm was just going by what the
>> kb from microsoft expressed.
>>
>> that the determination to run
>> 32 bit or 64 bit could be found
>> in that line entry under the
>> environment.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
>> DatabaseBen, Retired Professional
>> - Systems Analyst
>> - Database Developer
>> - Accountancy
>> - Veteran of the Armed Forces
>> - @Hotmail.com
>>
>> "share the nirvana mann" - dbZen
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>>

>>
>> "Oliver Aichinger" <o.aichinger@googlemail.com> wrote in message
>> news8A84417-D20B-4EE7-AF85-37D145698006@microsoft.com...
>>>
>>> "db" <databaseben@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>>> news:O14kUGnIKHA.4236@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>> hello,
>>>>
>>>> I have a question regarding
>>>> hardware.
>>>>
>>>> recently, I was considering
>>>> upgrading from 32 bit to
>>>> 64 bit vista and looked into
>>>> the alternate media aspect
>>>> of microsoft sales & replacements:
>>>>
>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/326246
>>>>
>>>> I went to double check what
>>>> my system stated via system>
>>>> advanced>enviroment>
>>>> system variables>processor
>>>> id.
>>>>
>>>> the line states x86 which implies
>>>> 32 bit processor.
>>>>
>>>> however, my processor is
>>>> actually a 64 bit quad core
>>>> on a compatiable mobo.
>>>>
>>>> so the processor id should
>>>> state x64.
>>>>
>>>> so why is there a difference
>>>> in what the properties state
>>>> to the cpu box I have in my
>>>> hand.
>>>>
>>>> thanks for any fyi.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
>>>> DatabaseBen, Retired Professional
>>>> - Systems Analyst
>>>> - Database Developer
>>>> - Accountancy
>>>> - Veteran of the Armed Forces
>>>> - @Hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> "share the nirvana mann" - dbZen
>>>>
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> What you see there has nothing to do with a 32 or 64 bit system. x86
>>> refers to the Intel x86 CPU family which could also be 64-Bit CPU.
>>> For more information see
>>> http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_te...i=54979,00.asp
>>>
>>> Many greetings from Germany
>>>
>>> Oliver

>>

>

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009
Tae Song
 

Posts: n/a
Re: x86 vs x64

"db" <databaseben@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:O14kUGnIKHA.4236@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> hello,
>
> I have a question regarding
> hardware.
>
> recently, I was considering
> upgrading from 32 bit to
> 64 bit vista and looked into
> the alternate media aspect
> of microsoft sales & replacements:
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/326246
>
> I went to double check what
> my system stated via system>
> advanced>enviroment>
> system variables>processor
> id.
>
> the line states x86 which implies
> 32 bit processor.
>


Wrong assumption.

x86 refers to Windows build being 32-bit not the processor. If you have
Windows Vista 64-bit it will say AMD (since AMD was first to introduce the
64-bit extension in their processors.)

I know this because I am running Windows Vista 64-bit and I have Intel Core
2 Quad and the environment variable says AMD.

Hopefully, that clears up any confusion.


> however, my processor is
> actually a 64 bit quad core
> on a compatiable mobo.
>
> so the processor id should
> state x64.
>
> so why is there a difference
> in what the properties state
> to the cpu box I have in my
> hand.
>
> thanks for any fyi.
>
>
>
> --
> db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
> DatabaseBen, Retired Professional
> - Systems Analyst
> - Database Developer
> - Accountancy
> - Veteran of the Armed Forces
> - @Hotmail.com
>
> "share the nirvana mann" - dbZen
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>




Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21.




Driver Scanner - Free Scan Now

Vistaheads.com is part of the Heads Network. See also XPHeads.com and Win7Heads.com.


Funny Commercials to make you laugh :-)

Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119