Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
|
|
An objective study that compares 3 OSs
microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
|
Click On Your Flag for Translation
|

02-27-2007
|
|
|
|
An objective study that compares 3 OSs
I bought a laptop with OEM Vista home Premium installed and have XP on my
desktop. I have to say I am not thrilled with the Vista but am willing to
tolerate its evolution in the same ways I tolerated XP's. So far I have been
fortunate with respect to the general operations of Vista as compared to
many of the posts, which has me thankful that I am using OEM rather than an
upgrade.
I wouldn't want to be in an MVP's shoes nowadays. If many of the posters
would remove their egos from the mix it would make things a lot easier for
them, as well as the rest of us who read this newsgroup for information, and
those of us who through long experience are thankful for having MVPs around
for their expertise and willingness to help.
It might be a good idea to set up an MS newsgroup entitled vista.rant &
vent, using mental health MVPs that could help ranters form rational
requests that treat the MVPs in a civil way for the benefit of all of us.
There is always room for critique, one of which is an objective comparison
study I found here:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/2007...pcworld/129410.
I am in agreement with the conclusions there, being unhappy with the UI, and
would like to see a response by Vista designers, upon whose shoulders the
results ought to justifiably rest, as well as any blame, and not on MVPs
here. The measures that place Vista back at a WIN98 level in some respects
are totally unacceptable to me, and make me glad that I am also keeping the
XP around.
I would like to see other users response to this article, pro or con. It
might help put things in perspective.
Frogman
|
|

02-27-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: An objective study that compares 3 OSs
1st).... I am not afraid to say that almost all MVP's I have seen in the
newsgroups
are stupid.... only a few bright exceptions exist... FORTUNATELY!
2nd) what you just discovered I have been ranting about for MONTHS.
Yet everyone claimed that either I was delusional or a troll...
Of course I was correct... and with time more and more people will
understand.
This article just touched the tip of the iceberg.... I can go on and on
about the
terrible problems the vista gui has... but im fed up with snobs her who tell
me I am a troll just because I dare to criticize their god-OS....
I could also make a video that would crush vista, but pointing out all its
terrible problems, and put it on youtube...
but then it will go around the world and MS will sue me for slander.... I
dont like contreversy on such small things...
I don't care very much anyway.. new technology is coming that
will be so powerful that even a slugging slimy snail like vista will fly...
100 core CPU, solid state Hard disks, and much more... I prefer to ride the
wave of progress, but Im not dumb to not know
when something is designed well or not... I am lucky because I am able to
tweak and change an interface to my needs..
but most people use what they are given...
It was for them that I was protesting.. not me..... but MVP's and
knucklehead vistaboys in here don't understand....
"frogliver" <f_gliver@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OakEnkrWHHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I bought a laptop with OEM Vista home Premium installed and have XP on my
>desktop. I have to say I am not thrilled with the Vista but am willing to
>tolerate its evolution in the same ways I tolerated XP's. So far I have
>been fortunate with respect to the general operations of Vista as compared
>to many of the posts, which has me thankful that I am using OEM rather than
>an upgrade.
>
> I wouldn't want to be in an MVP's shoes nowadays. If many of the posters
> would remove their egos from the mix it would make things a lot easier for
> them, as well as the rest of us who read this newsgroup for information,
> and those of us who through long experience are thankful for having MVPs
> around for their expertise and willingness to help.
>
> It might be a good idea to set up an MS newsgroup entitled vista.rant &
> vent, using mental health MVPs that could help ranters form rational
> requests that treat the MVPs in a civil way for the benefit of all of us.
> There is always room for critique, one of which is an objective comparison
> study I found here:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/2007...pcworld/129410.
>
> I am in agreement with the conclusions there, being unhappy with the UI,
> and would like to see a response by Vista designers, upon whose shoulders
> the results ought to justifiably rest, as well as any blame, and not on
> MVPs here. The measures that place Vista back at a WIN98 level in some
> respects are totally unacceptable to me, and make me glad that I am also
> keeping the XP around.
>
> I would like to see other users response to this article, pro or con. It
> might help put things in perspective.
>
> Frogman
|
|

02-27-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: An objective study that compares 3 OSs
"In Vista, a folder fades in, as if it appears out of nothing. It looks
great, but after 10 times you realize you're losing time waiting for that."
I certainly agree with that, I hate fade effects. I always turned the menu
fade effect off in XP.
However, I don't understand the rest of it. If I click on a menu it pops up
instantly. What's the problem there?
For example in XP, if you have a ton of apps installed and you click
programs in your start menu, it can take a while for the menu to finally
show itself. I don't notice that in Vista at any level.
Can others give there experience with this?
"frogliver" <f_gliver@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OakEnkrWHHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I bought a laptop with OEM Vista home Premium installed and have XP on my
>desktop. I have to say I am not thrilled with the Vista but am willing to
>tolerate its evolution in the same ways I tolerated XP's. So far I have
>been fortunate with respect to the general operations of Vista as compared
>to many of the posts, which has me thankful that I am using OEM rather than
>an upgrade.
>
> I wouldn't want to be in an MVP's shoes nowadays. If many of the posters
> would remove their egos from the mix it would make things a lot easier for
> them, as well as the rest of us who read this newsgroup for information,
> and those of us who through long experience are thankful for having MVPs
> around for their expertise and willingness to help.
>
> It might be a good idea to set up an MS newsgroup entitled vista.rant &
> vent, using mental health MVPs that could help ranters form rational
> requests that treat the MVPs in a civil way for the benefit of all of us.
> There is always room for critique, one of which is an objective comparison
> study I found here:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/2007...pcworld/129410.
>
> I am in agreement with the conclusions there, being unhappy with the UI,
> and would like to see a response by Vista designers, upon whose shoulders
> the results ought to justifiably rest, as well as any blame, and not on
> MVPs here. The measures that place Vista back at a WIN98 level in some
> respects are totally unacceptable to me, and make me glad that I am also
> keeping the XP around.
>
> I would like to see other users response to this article, pro or con. It
> might help put things in perspective.
>
> Frogman
|
|

02-27-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: An objective study that compares 3 OSs
Give it a month or two and you'll never go back. You'll find you can get
everything done much more quickly in Vista. Even the little things, like
being able to tap the Windows key and type something like:
from:susan about :contract
to find an e-mail message about contracts from someone named Susan, without
having to open any programs or navigate through any folders makes a huge
difference. Once you get the hang of it. You spend virtually zero time
looking for and navigating to stuff and more time actually doing stuff. It's
a huge improvement, and a harbinger of even better things to come.
The lack of drivers is a major pain. You either have to buy a machine with
it pre-installed, or make sure the machine you build has all the right
stuff. (I'm still waiting for motherboards with ReadyBoost right on the
board, or hybrid drives with that built in. That'll make a big difference.
I'd rather go that route then a flash drive. (Though my reasons for this
preference aren't based on anything factual. I just like the idea of not
having that hanging off some USB port).
But you're right about one thing. The vast majority of problems here are
from people who have no idea what they're doing and are just trying to guess
and hack their way through everything blindly. Then they get angry and their
guessing doesn't work. Also, there's a lot of unrealistic expectations about
Vista being like some kind of minor XP upgrade, where everything that worked
in XP works in Vista. And everything you could do in XP you can do, and do
do, the same way. But this is a much bigger change that that. This is one of
those major changes that comes along every 10 or 15 years and causes all
kinds of headaches. But we need those kinds of changes, and we've been due
for one for a while. It's a painful transition, but definitely a good one.
"frogliver" <f_gliver@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OakEnkrWHHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I bought a laptop with OEM Vista home Premium installed and have XP on my
>desktop. I have to say I am not thrilled with the Vista but am willing to
>tolerate its evolution in the same ways I tolerated XP's. So far I have
>been fortunate with respect to the general operations of Vista as compared
>to many of the posts, which has me thankful that I am using OEM rather than
>an upgrade.
>
> I wouldn't want to be in an MVP's shoes nowadays. If many of the posters
> would remove their egos from the mix it would make things a lot easier for
> them, as well as the rest of us who read this newsgroup for information,
> and those of us who through long experience are thankful for having MVPs
> around for their expertise and willingness to help.
>
> It might be a good idea to set up an MS newsgroup entitled vista.rant &
> vent, using mental health MVPs that could help ranters form rational
> requests that treat the MVPs in a civil way for the benefit of all of us.
> There is always room for critique, one of which is an objective comparison
> study I found here:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/2007...pcworld/129410.
>
> I am in agreement with the conclusions there, being unhappy with the UI,
> and would like to see a response by Vista designers, upon whose shoulders
> the results ought to justifiably rest, as well as any blame, and not on
> MVPs here. The measures that place Vista back at a WIN98 level in some
> respects are totally unacceptable to me, and make me glad that I am also
> keeping the XP around.
>
> I would like to see other users response to this article, pro or con. It
> might help put things in perspective.
>
> Frogman
|
|

02-27-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: An objective study that compares 3 OSs
"jim" <1@1.1> wrote in message news:e4R$TxrWHHA.3568@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> 2nd) what you just discovered I have been ranting about for MONTHS.
> Yet everyone claimed that either I was delusional or a troll...
If you say you are having a specific problem then no one has any right to
disqualify your problem. They may have their own opinion that Vista might
not be at fault. Would it be absurd to to blame your video drivers for a
poor 3D experience? As I mentioned in my own post, I don't have these
problems. Yet I admit there are "waste of time" features.
Since some people don't have this problem and other do then it's very easy
to blame hardware or the software that runs it (drivers).
> I could also make a video that would crush vista, but pointing out all its
> terrible problems, and put it on youtube...
You should! I'd like to see "visually" what you've found.
> but then it will go around the world and MS will sue me for slander.... I
Making that video and performing slander are two different things. Would
you be able to make the video without being slanderous? More people would
take you seriously if you did.
|
|

02-27-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: An objective study that compares 3 OSs
I just got done with a very long flame war about this. I said all the same
things. What you claim here are my exact findings after having given 5
employees Vista for a while then giving them XP back. They all wanted Vista
returned to them.
So, this further proves that some people have these problems and some
obviously do not.
Since we're talking about Aero, I still point my finger at drivers.
"Nita Klew" <nospam@noreply.com> wrote in message
news:OD1MWzrWHHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Give it a month or two and you'll never go back. You'll find you can get
> everything done much more quickly in Vista. Even the little things, like
> being able to tap the Windows key and type something like:
>
> from:susan about:contract
>
> to find an e-mail message about contracts from someone named Susan,
> without having to open any programs or navigate through any folders makes
> a huge difference. Once you get the hang of it. You spend virtually zero
> time looking for and navigating to stuff and more time actually doing
> stuff. It's a huge improvement, and a harbinger of even better things to
> come.
>
> The lack of drivers is a major pain. You either have to buy a machine with
> it pre-installed, or make sure the machine you build has all the right
> stuff. (I'm still waiting for motherboards with ReadyBoost right on the
> board, or hybrid drives with that built in. That'll make a big difference.
> I'd rather go that route then a flash drive. (Though my reasons for this
> preference aren't based on anything factual. I just like the idea of not
> having that hanging off some USB port).
>
> But you're right about one thing. The vast majority of problems here are
> from people who have no idea what they're doing and are just trying to
> guess and hack their way through everything blindly. Then they get angry
> and their guessing doesn't work. Also, there's a lot of unrealistic
> expectations about Vista being like some kind of minor XP upgrade, where
> everything that worked in XP works in Vista. And everything you could do
> in XP you can do, and do do, the same way. But this is a much bigger
> change that that. This is one of those major changes that comes along
> every 10 or 15 years and causes all kinds of headaches. But we need those
> kinds of changes, and we've been due for one for a while. It's a painful
> transition, but definitely a good one.
>
>
>
>
>
> "frogliver" <f_gliver@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:OakEnkrWHHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>I bought a laptop with OEM Vista home Premium installed and have XP on my
>>desktop. I have to say I am not thrilled with the Vista but am willing to
>>tolerate its evolution in the same ways I tolerated XP's. So far I have
>>been fortunate with respect to the general operations of Vista as compared
>>to many of the posts, which has me thankful that I am using OEM rather
>>than an upgrade.
>>
>> I wouldn't want to be in an MVP's shoes nowadays. If many of the posters
>> would remove their egos from the mix it would make things a lot easier
>> for them, as well as the rest of us who read this newsgroup for
>> information, and those of us who through long experience are thankful for
>> having MVPs around for their expertise and willingness to help.
>>
>> It might be a good idea to set up an MS newsgroup entitled vista.rant &
>> vent, using mental health MVPs that could help ranters form rational
>> requests that treat the MVPs in a civil way for the benefit of all of us.
>> There is always room for critique, one of which is an objective
>> comparison study I found here:
>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/2007...pcworld/129410.
>>
>> I am in agreement with the conclusions there, being unhappy with the UI,
>> and would like to see a response by Vista designers, upon whose shoulders
>> the results ought to justifiably rest, as well as any blame, and not on
>> MVPs here. The measures that place Vista back at a WIN98 level in some
>> respects are totally unacceptable to me, and make me glad that I am also
>> keeping the XP around.
>>
>> I would like to see other users response to this article, pro or con. It
>> might help put things in perspective.
>>
>> Frogman
>
>
|
|

02-27-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: An objective study that compares 3 OSs
>from:susan about :contract
what a pile of crap! How many people are going to use that? lol
First of all you should learn to organize with logic not depend on a stupid
service that is working 24/7 in the background indexing your stuff....
Indexing is a stupid technology that does not have very much time left in
its lifespan...
it takes up resources and its horrible to see your hard drive flashing when
nothing is going on on the computer... I CALL THAT A NIGHTMARE!
You are stupid.. there is no other explaination.. nothing in vista makes you
navigate faster... I dare you ... lets make a race.. XP is faster, far
faster!
HELP I AM IN A NEWSGROUP WITH DELUSIONAL SHEEPLE THAT FOLLOW BLINDLY
WHATEVER MS TELLS THEM IS "GOOD"
AAAARGGGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!! Im out of here.. I have seen enough stupidity for
one day!
"Nita Klew" <nospam@noreply.com> wrote in message
news:OD1MWzrWHHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Give it a month or two and you'll never go back. You'll find you can get
> everything done much more quickly in Vista. Even the little things, like
> being able to tap the Windows key and type something like:
>
> from:susan about:contract
>
> to find an e-mail message about contracts from someone named Susan,
> without having to open any programs or navigate through any folders makes
> a huge difference. Once you get the hang of it. You spend virtually zero
> time looking for and navigating to stuff and more time actually doing
> stuff. It's a huge improvement, and a harbinger of even better things to
> come.
>
> The lack of drivers is a major pain. You either have to buy a machine with
> it pre-installed, or make sure the machine you build has all the right
> stuff. (I'm still waiting for motherboards with ReadyBoost right on the
> board, or hybrid drives with that built in. That'll make a big difference.
> I'd rather go that route then a flash drive. (Though my reasons for this
> preference aren't based on anything factual. I just like the idea of not
> having that hanging off some USB port).
>
> But you're right about one thing. The vast majority of problems here are
> from people who have no idea what they're doing and are just trying to
> guess and hack their way through everything blindly. Then they get angry
> and their guessing doesn't work. Also, there's a lot of unrealistic
> expectations about Vista being like some kind of minor XP upgrade, where
> everything that worked in XP works in Vista. And everything you could do
> in XP you can do, and do do, the same way. But this is a much bigger
> change that that. This is one of those major changes that comes along
> every 10 or 15 years and causes all kinds of headaches. But we need those
> kinds of changes, and we've been due for one for a while. It's a painful
> transition, but definitely a good one.
>
>
>
>
>
> "frogliver" <f_gliver@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:OakEnkrWHHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>I bought a laptop with OEM Vista home Premium installed and have XP on my
>>desktop. I have to say I am not thrilled with the Vista but am willing to
>>tolerate its evolution in the same ways I tolerated XP's. So far I have
>>been fortunate with respect to the general operations of Vista as compared
>>to many of the posts, which has me thankful that I am using OEM rather
>>than an upgrade.
>>
>> I wouldn't want to be in an MVP's shoes nowadays. If many of the posters
>> would remove their egos from the mix it would make things a lot easier
>> for them, as well as the rest of us who read this newsgroup for
>> information, and those of us who through long experience are thankful for
>> having MVPs around for their expertise and willingness to help.
>>
>> It might be a good idea to set up an MS newsgroup entitled vista.rant &
>> vent, using mental health MVPs that could help ranters form rational
>> requests that treat the MVPs in a civil way for the benefit of all of us.
>> There is always room for critique, one of which is an objective
>> comparison study I found here:
>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/2007...pcworld/129410.
>>
>> I am in agreement with the conclusions there, being unhappy with the UI,
>> and would like to see a response by Vista designers, upon whose shoulders
>> the results ought to justifiably rest, as well as any blame, and not on
>> MVPs here. The measures that place Vista back at a WIN98 level in some
>> respects are totally unacceptable to me, and make me glad that I am also
>> keeping the XP around.
>>
>> I would like to see other users response to this article, pro or con. It
>> might help put things in perspective.
>>
>> Frogman
>
>
|
|

02-27-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: An objective study that compares 3 OSs
You mean I cant call vista stupid in the video then?
I cant do it! Sorry.. my opinion of vista would leak.. I would not be able
to just give the facts cold and without emotion...
And for what purpose would I do that? To satisfy my ego that I have been
correct all along about the problems with vista? I don't care really about
that...
To drive people away from vista? Im not sure that its the best thing to do
even if it has flaws...
MS will not care about the video... and they wont change anything because of
it... so it will create controversy without doing any good.
So there is no real reason. No motive for me to do it....
I prefer to focus on positive stuff... that video would be negative and this
is not what
I want to show the world.
So nothing is to be gained by it...
Now perhaps I could make a video on how to customize vista for better
functionality and speed... that is positive...
"Justin" <None@None.com> wrote in message
news:uxKQm4rWHHA.4180@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> "jim" <1@1.1> wrote in message
> news:e4R$TxrWHHA.3568@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> 2nd) what you just discovered I have been ranting about for MONTHS.
>> Yet everyone claimed that either I was delusional or a troll...
>
> If you say you are having a specific problem then no one has any right to
> disqualify your problem. They may have their own opinion that Vista might
> not be at fault. Would it be absurd to to blame your video drivers for a
> poor 3D experience? As I mentioned in my own post, I don't have these
> problems. Yet I admit there are "waste of time" features.
>
> Since some people don't have this problem and other do then it's very easy
> to blame hardware or the software that runs it (drivers).
>
>
>> I could also make a video that would crush vista, but pointing out all
>> its terrible problems, and put it on youtube...
>
> You should! I'd like to see "visually" what you've found.
>
>> but then it will go around the world and MS will sue me for slander.... I
>
> Making that video and performing slander are two different things. Would
> you be able to make the video without being slanderous? More people would
> take you seriously if you did.
|
|

02-27-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: An objective study that compares 3 OSs
Feed them hamburgers and coke for 5 days.. they wont want to go back to
greenbeans and salads...
So hamburgers are better? lol
I have a bad feeling in my stomach whenever I sit in front of a vista
machine..
its repulsive!
"Justin" <None@None.com> wrote in message
news:ecnbI7rWHHA.1212@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>I just got done with a very long flame war about this. I said all the same
>things. What you claim here are my exact findings after having given 5
>employees Vista for a while then giving them XP back. They all wanted
>Vista returned to them.
>
> So, this further proves that some people have these problems and some
> obviously do not.
>
> Since we're talking about Aero, I still point my finger at drivers.
>
>
>
> "Nita Klew" <nospam@noreply.com> wrote in message
> news:OD1MWzrWHHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Give it a month or two and you'll never go back. You'll find you can get
>> everything done much more quickly in Vista. Even the little things, like
>> being able to tap the Windows key and type something like:
>>
>> from:susan about:contract
>>
>> to find an e-mail message about contracts from someone named Susan,
>> without having to open any programs or navigate through any folders makes
>> a huge difference. Once you get the hang of it. You spend virtually zero
>> time looking for and navigating to stuff and more time actually doing
>> stuff. It's a huge improvement, and a harbinger of even better things to
>> come.
>>
>> The lack of drivers is a major pain. You either have to buy a machine
>> with it pre-installed, or make sure the machine you build has all the
>> right stuff. (I'm still waiting for motherboards with ReadyBoost right on
>> the board, or hybrid drives with that built in. That'll make a big
>> difference. I'd rather go that route then a flash drive. (Though my
>> reasons for this preference aren't based on anything factual. I just like
>> the idea of not having that hanging off some USB port).
>>
>> But you're right about one thing. The vast majority of problems here are
>> from people who have no idea what they're doing and are just trying to
>> guess and hack their way through everything blindly. Then they get angry
>> and their guessing doesn't work. Also, there's a lot of unrealistic
>> expectations about Vista being like some kind of minor XP upgrade, where
>> everything that worked in XP works in Vista. And everything you could do
>> in XP you can do, and do do, the same way. But this is a much bigger
>> change that that. This is one of those major changes that comes along
>> every 10 or 15 years and causes all kinds of headaches. But we need those
>> kinds of changes, and we've been due for one for a while. It's a painful
>> transition, but definitely a good one.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "frogliver" <f_gliver@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:OakEnkrWHHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>I bought a laptop with OEM Vista home Premium installed and have XP on my
>>>desktop. I have to say I am not thrilled with the Vista but am willing to
>>>tolerate its evolution in the same ways I tolerated XP's. So far I have
>>>been fortunate with respect to the general operations of Vista as
>>>compared to many of the posts, which has me thankful that I am using OEM
>>>rather than an upgrade.
>>>
>>> I wouldn't want to be in an MVP's shoes nowadays. If many of the posters
>>> would remove their egos from the mix it would make things a lot easier
>>> for them, as well as the rest of us who read this newsgroup for
>>> information, and those of us who through long experience are thankful
>>> for having MVPs around for their expertise and willingness to help.
>>>
>>> It might be a good idea to set up an MS newsgroup entitled vista.rant &
>>> vent, using mental health MVPs that could help ranters form rational
>>> requests that treat the MVPs in a civil way for the benefit of all of
>>> us. There is always room for critique, one of which is an objective
>>> comparison study I found here:
>>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/2007...pcworld/129410.
>>>
>>> I am in agreement with the conclusions there, being unhappy with the UI,
>>> and would like to see a response by Vista designers, upon whose
>>> shoulders the results ought to justifiably rest, as well as any blame,
>>> and not on MVPs here. The measures that place Vista back at a WIN98
>>> level in some respects are totally unacceptable to me, and make me glad
>>> that I am also keeping the XP around.
>>>
>>> I would like to see other users response to this article, pro or con. It
>>> might help put things in perspective.
>>>
>>> Frogman
>>
>>
|
|

02-27-2007
|
|
|
|
Re: An objective study that compares 3 OSs
"jim" <1@1.1> wrote in message news:umerHAsWHHA.4844@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> You mean I cant call vista stupid in the video then?
You can. That's not slander. That's you opinion. But if you did that, the
average person would not take you seriously.
> And for what purpose would I do that? To satisfy my ego that I have been
> correct all along about the problems with vista? I don't care really about
> that...
Um....no. To show us what problems you have found without text causing poor
communication in NGs.
> So there is no real reason. No motive for me to do it....
ok
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:52.
|
|