The way it was explained was that there are certain functions that while
they seem immaterial or marginal require huge amounts of re-coding to
change. Software doesn't function as simple sub-routines. Everything is
dependant on other things. So to change that dialog might be 7 lines of
code, but it might cause 2,000 other things to break and then you'd have
to rewrite maybe thousands of lines of code. Every single change can
introduce unexpected results. Unfortunately, users only see the Shell &
not all the underlying work that is done.
"Ron Martell" <ron.martell@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2v7ft2dcggnr69ig2aod7ks1opaa10a3ia@4ax.com...
> dieHard® <dieHard@msn.com> wrote:
>
>>Someone please explain this, as I keep hearing about how Vista is "new
>>from
>>the ground up".
>>
>>- Go to C:\Windows\Fonts
>>- right-click anywhere in the right pane and select "Add New Font"
>>
>>Am I blind or isn't that dialog that pops open straight out of Windows for
>>WorkGroups 3.11?
>>
>>"more of the same" is more like it...
>
> If it works and meets all of the requirements why not keep it in use?
>
> Why spend time and money reinventing the wheel?
>
> Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
> --
> Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
> On-Line Help Computer Service
> http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
> Syberfix Remote Computer Repair
>
> "Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference
> has never been in bed with a mosquito."