Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads
Recommended Download - Clean, repair and optimize your system



Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now

Vista still contains bits from WFWG's???

microsoft.public.windows.vista.general




Recommended Fix - Fix Vista Errors and Optimize Performance

Click On Your Flag for Translation
Simplified Chinese French Spanish Italian Portugeuse Japanese German Dutch
Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now
Reply
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2007
=?iso-8859-1?Q?dieHard=AE?=
 

Posts: n/a
Vista still contains bits from WFWG's???
Someone please explain this, as I keep hearing about how Vista is "new from
the ground up".

- Go to C:\Windows\Fonts
- right-click anywhere in the right pane and select "Add New Font"

Am I blind or isn't that dialog that pops open straight out of Windows for
WorkGroups 3.11?

"more of the same" is more like it...

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2007
Shane Nokes
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Vista still contains bits from WFWG's???
That was actually a huge issue with a lot of us beta testers.

We weren't too happy about that.

Needless to say it is one of the only remaining items from that era.


"dieHard®" <dieHard@msn.com> wrote in message
news:uxJGjIvUHHA.868@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Someone please explain this, as I keep hearing about how Vista is "new
> from the ground up".
>
> - Go to C:\Windows\Fonts
> - right-click anywhere in the right pane and select "Add New Font"
>
> Am I blind or isn't that dialog that pops open straight out of Windows for
> WorkGroups 3.11?
>
> "more of the same" is more like it...


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2007
Richard Urban
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Vista still contains bits from WFWG's???
This has already been posted. You are not the one to find it.

--


Regards,



"dieHard®" <dieHard@msn.com> wrote in message
news:uxJGjIvUHHA.868@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Someone please explain this, as I keep hearing about how Vista is "new
> from the ground up".
>
> - Go to C:\Windows\Fonts
> - right-click anywhere in the right pane and select "Add New Font"
>
> Am I blind or isn't that dialog that pops open straight out of Windows for
> WorkGroups 3.11?
>
> "more of the same" is more like it...


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2007
Ron Martell
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Vista still contains bits from WFWG's???
dieHard® <dieHard@msn.com> wrote:

>Someone please explain this, as I keep hearing about how Vista is "new from
>the ground up".
>
>- Go to C:\Windows\Fonts
>- right-click anywhere in the right pane and select "Add New Font"
>
>Am I blind or isn't that dialog that pops open straight out of Windows for
>WorkGroups 3.11?
>
>"more of the same" is more like it...


If it works and meets all of the requirements why not keep it in use?

Why spend time and money reinventing the wheel?

Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
Syberfix Remote Computer Repair

"Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference
has never been in bed with a mosquito."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2007
R. McCarty
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Vista still contains bits from WFWG's???
The way it was explained was that there are certain functions that while
they seem immaterial or marginal require huge amounts of re-coding to
change. Software doesn't function as simple sub-routines. Everything is
dependant on other things. So to change that dialog might be 7 lines of
code, but it might cause 2,000 other things to break and then you'd have
to rewrite maybe thousands of lines of code. Every single change can
introduce unexpected results. Unfortunately, users only see the Shell &
not all the underlying work that is done.

"Ron Martell" <ron.martell@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2v7ft2dcggnr69ig2aod7ks1opaa10a3ia@4ax.com...
> dieHard® <dieHard@msn.com> wrote:
>
>>Someone please explain this, as I keep hearing about how Vista is "new
>>from
>>the ground up".
>>
>>- Go to C:\Windows\Fonts
>>- right-click anywhere in the right pane and select "Add New Font"
>>
>>Am I blind or isn't that dialog that pops open straight out of Windows for
>>WorkGroups 3.11?
>>
>>"more of the same" is more like it...

>
> If it works and meets all of the requirements why not keep it in use?
>
> Why spend time and money reinventing the wheel?
>
> Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
> --
> Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
> On-Line Help Computer Service
> http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
> Syberfix Remote Computer Repair
>
> "Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference
> has never been in bed with a mosquito."



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2007
BSchnur
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Vista still contains bits from WFWG's???
> This has already been posted. You are not the one to find it.
>

He didn't say he was the 'only one'....

--
Barry Schnur
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2007
Mark
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Vista still contains bits from WFWG's???
This Add Fonts window also exist in Windows XP.

On 2/17/2007 7:17 PM, dieHard®:
> Someone please explain this, as I keep hearing about how Vista is "new
> from the ground up".
>
> - Go to C:\Windows\Fonts
> - right-click anywhere in the right pane and select "Add New Font"
>
> Am I blind or isn't that dialog that pops open straight out of Windows for
> WorkGroups 3.11?
>
> "more of the same" is more like it...

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2007
Scott
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Vista still contains bits from WFWG's???
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:24:04 -0800, "Shane Nokes"
<Morpheus_Phreak@nospam.msn.com> spake thusly:

>That was actually a huge issue with a lot of us beta testers.
>
>We weren't too happy about that.
>
>Needless to say it is one of the only remaining items from that era.


That is REALLY bizarre. I almost never install fonts so I've not
noticed.*

I wonder if I can turn up progman.exe, cardfile.exe and winfile.exe in
a search of my Windows folder? ;-)








*OK, I've installed a number of fonts, but only because they came with
other programs and said programs do the installation at setup.

--
Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2007
Conor
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Vista still contains bits from WFWG's???
In article <uxJGjIvUHHA.868@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, dieHard® says...
> Someone please explain this, as I keep hearing about how Vista is "new from
> the ground up".
>
> - Go to C:\Windows\Fonts
> - right-click anywhere in the right pane and select "Add New Font"
>
> Am I blind or isn't that dialog that pops open straight out of Windows for
> WorkGroups 3.11?
>
> "more of the same" is more like it...
>

So what? If it does the job, why does it need changing?


--
Conor

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright
until you hear them speak.........
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2007
Robert Firth
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Vista still contains bits from WFWG's???
It was a big deal for some people a few months back. People always need
something to complain about. I could really care less about the add font
dialog

I think it is pretty funny how people are so hypocritical. Microsoft can
make pretty things, but people will call it eye candy. Microsoft can leave
well enough alone, and people wonder where the eye candy is!

--
/* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Robert Firth *
* Windows Vista x86 RTM *
* http://www.WinVistaInfo.org *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */

"Scott" <geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote in message
news:9heft25v82qo1c8s60bfp7hpgalo56dqrd@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:24:04 -0800, "Shane Nokes"
> <Morpheus_Phreak@nospam.msn.com> spake thusly:
>
>>That was actually a huge issue with a lot of us beta testers.
>>
>>We weren't too happy about that.
>>
>>Needless to say it is one of the only remaining items from that era.

>
> That is REALLY bizarre. I almost never install fonts so I've not
> noticed.*
>
> I wonder if I can turn up progman.exe, cardfile.exe and winfile.exe in
> a search of my Windows folder? ;-)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *OK, I've installed a number of fonts, but only because they came with
> other programs and said programs do the installation at setup.
>
> --
> Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows Vista Ultimate 64 Bits MUI =?Utf-8?B?SmFtZXMgV2lsbGlhbSBHYXJjaWEgQ2hpY2E=?= microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 1 03-01-2007 12:27
Should I use Windows Vista Ultimate 32 or 64 bits? reidarT microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 3 03-01-2007 03:04




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37.




Driver Scanner - Free Scan Now

Vistaheads.com is part of the Heads Network. See also XPHeads.com and Win7Heads.com.


Funny Commercials to make you laugh :-)

Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119