Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads
Recommended Download - Clean, repair and optimize your system



Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now

Holy Cow Batman, Vista can be fast...

microsoft.public.windows.vista.general




Recommended Fix - Fix Vista Errors and Optimize Performance

Click On Your Flag for Translation
Simplified Chinese French Spanish Italian Portugeuse Japanese German Dutch
Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now
Reply
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-27-2007
Adam Albright
 

Posts: n/a
Holy Cow Batman, Vista can be fast...
This is mainly of interest to people that use Agent as their news
reader and download multi-part large files. I have used Agent for more
years than I can remember and till yesterday haven't upgraded for a
long time. Shame on me.

Geez... boy, did they improve it!

I heard good things about version 4.2, (tuned for Vista) so had to try
for myself, only $15 for a upgrade. They totally redid the interface
from what it was years back, but added a lot of really cool features
like support for multiple threading within a single instance.

I have broadband and I use a premium news server, so your results may
not be as super.

Under the old version of Agent I thought it was smoking if it even
just rarely ran at about 35 MB a minute, which is pretty fast file
transfer over the Usenet even with broadband since the premium news
server I'm using typically has 25,000 or more connections going.

Today I set a new speed record, a whopping 1.1 MB a second! That's
right; over a MB a second transfer speed, in part since Agent now will
do multi-threading with just one connection, so it was doing up to
nine downloads off the same news server (they allow up to 10
connections) at once without me having to run multiple instances or
set anything special up. That delivered a blistering fast 64 MB a
minute download speed meaning it took me just a tad over 3 minutes to
download a 19 minute movie weighting at about 170 MB. Not bad
performance. ;-)

Just curious... anybody getting similar performance with other news
readers/news servers?

http://www.usenetserver.com/networkstatus.html

Of course it don't hurt if the news server farm is outputing close to
20 gbps.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-27-2007
Tiberius
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Holy Cow Batman, Vista can be fast...
Thanks for the heads up, I will try it at once...

For some laughs Im reposting the 12 ways to make vista fast

1. drop it off the empire state building, you will have g accelaretion minus
air friction. Use an aerodynamic case.
2. Stuff it inside a nuclear cannon and pull the trigger.
3. Place on top of a Saturn 3 stage rocket and hurl it into space
4. Place it inside the CERN particle accelerator
5. Send it inside a black hole where it will accelerate close to the speed
of light
6. Place it inside a small time machine, so that its time continuum is
faster than ours
7. Take your vista and install it on the computer from the crashed Roswell
UFO that is a trillion trillion teraflops,
it will probably slow it to a crawl, but the dead aliens wont care much.
8. Freeze all humanity in hypothermic stasis using cryogenics until vista
finished loading a program, then when its finished, thaw them. Vista will
not really be faster, but at least you wont die waiting for it.
9. Kill yourself and let your ghost use vista, as a ghost time has no
meaning,
10. Collide vista that is made of matter with anti-vista that is made from
antimatter. The result will be an explosion were all matter is converted to
pure energy in the form of gamma rays traveling at the speed of light.
11. Place Vista on top of a Tesla coil and step up the voltage to 100
million volts. An electrical surge of all the static electricity in the
stratosphere will surge through it and send it to the 5th dimension creating
a teleporting effect similar to the one in the Philadelphia experiment.
12. Install XP and make it into a fake vista with themes and wallpapers...
it will be 100% faster than the real horrid thing.

-thank you




"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
news:6oqj539560ks7ee1k6dgk4sqvm4p81gn1m@4ax.com...
> This is mainly of interest to people that use Agent as their news
> reader and download multi-part large files. I have used Agent for more
> years than I can remember and till yesterday haven't upgraded for a
> long time. Shame on me.
>
> Geez... boy, did they improve it!
>
> I heard good things about version 4.2, (tuned for Vista) so had to try
> for myself, only $15 for a upgrade. They totally redid the interface
> from what it was years back, but added a lot of really cool features
> like support for multiple threading within a single instance.
>
> I have broadband and I use a premium news server, so your results may
> not be as super.
>
> Under the old version of Agent I thought it was smoking if it even
> just rarely ran at about 35 MB a minute, which is pretty fast file
> transfer over the Usenet even with broadband since the premium news
> server I'm using typically has 25,000 or more connections going.
>
> Today I set a new speed record, a whopping 1.1 MB a second! That's
> right; over a MB a second transfer speed, in part since Agent now will
> do multi-threading with just one connection, so it was doing up to
> nine downloads off the same news server (they allow up to 10
> connections) at once without me having to run multiple instances or
> set anything special up. That delivered a blistering fast 64 MB a
> minute download speed meaning it took me just a tad over 3 minutes to
> download a 19 minute movie weighting at about 170 MB. Not bad
> performance. ;-)
>
> Just curious... anybody getting similar performance with other news
> readers/news servers?
>
> http://www.usenetserver.com/networkstatus.html
>
> Of course it don't hurt if the news server farm is outputing close to
> 20 gbps.
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-27-2007
DanS
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Holy Cow Batman, Vista can be fast...
Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote in
news:6oqj539560ks7ee1k6dgk4sqvm4p81gn1m@4ax.com:

> This is mainly of interest to people that use Agent as their news
> reader and download multi-part large files. I have used Agent for more
> years than I can remember and till yesterday haven't upgraded for a
> long time. Shame on me.
>
> Geez... boy, did they improve it!
>
> I heard good things about version 4.2, (tuned for Vista) so had to try
> for myself, only $15 for a upgrade. They totally redid the interface
> from what it was years back, but added a lot of really cool features
> like support for multiple threading within a single instance.


They *just* added multi-threaded downloads ?

>
> I have broadband and I use a premium news server, so your results may
> not be as super.
>
> Under the old version of Agent I thought it was smoking if it even
> just rarely ran at about 35 MB a minute, which is pretty fast file
> transfer over the Usenet even with broadband since the premium news
> server I'm using typically has 25,000 or more connections going.
>
> Today I set a new speed record, a whopping 1.1 MB a second! That's
> right; over a MB a second transfer speed, in part since Agent now will
> do multi-threading with just one connection, so it was doing up to
> nine downloads off the same news server (they allow up to 10
> connections) at once without me having to run multiple instances or
> set anything special up. That delivered a blistering fast 64 MB a
> minute download speed meaning it took me just a tad over 3 minutes to
> download a 19 minute movie weighting at about 170 MB. Not bad
> performance. ;-)
>
> Just curious... anybody getting similar performance with other news
> readers/news servers?
>
> http://www.usenetserver.com/networkstatus.html
>
> Of course it don't hurt if the news server farm is outputing close to
> 20 gbps.
>


Won't hurt either if your pipe is that fat.
64 MB/min = 1.06 MB/sec = 8.5 Mbits/sec + overhead = VERY fast regardless
of the OS.

I'd be interested to see what the difference is between Agent and
NewsLeecher with the same number of D/L threads to the same servers.

Of course, now the obligatory knock about the subject != the content of
the thread. It should have read 'Agent can be fast...', as we are talking
about a completely new version of an application.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-27-2007
Adam Albright
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Holy Cow Batman, Vista can be fast...
On Sun, 27 May 2007 16:25:12 -0500, DanS
<t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@a.d.e.l.p.h.i.a.n.e.t> wrote:

>Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote in
>news:6oqj539560ks7ee1k6dgk4sqvm4p81gn1m@4ax.com :
>
>> This is mainly of interest to people that use Agent as their news
>> reader and download multi-part large files. I have used Agent for more
>> years than I can remember and till yesterday haven't upgraded for a
>> long time. Shame on me.
>>
>> Geez... boy, did they improve it!
>>
>> I heard good things about version 4.2, (tuned for Vista) so had to try
>> for myself, only $15 for a upgrade. They totally redid the interface
>> from what it was years back, but added a lot of really cool features
>> like support for multiple threading within a single instance.

>
>They *just* added multi-threaded downloads ?


I have no idea... been using a old version of Agent. Old habits are
hard to break. Maybe it was in a earlier version, I was using 1.8
which is oh I don't know about 5, 6 years old? Graf...

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-28-2007
Mr. Arnold
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Holy Cow Batman, Vista can be fast...
Holy Cow Batman? You must be older than dirt, like me.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-28-2007
Joey DoWop Dee
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Holy Cow Batman, Vista can be fast...
On Sun, 27 May 2007 17:16:21 -0400, Tiberius wrote:

>
> For some laughs Im reposting the 12 ways to make vista fast
>
> 1. drop it off the empire state building


hey, Hey, HEY!! That's my neighborhood! Go someplace else... go over to Trump
Tower and drop it. No one matters over there.

--
Joey DoWop Dee
Remember: It is To Laugh

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-28-2007
PNutts
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Holy Cow Batman, Vista can be fast...
You bring up a good point. Many folks downloaded the betas and RCs of Vista
and either upgraded their PC or after installing Vista put all their old
stuff back on and didn't have a good experience so now the OS "sucks".

The people that paid attention to the minimum requirements (and then
multiplied by their personal standards and used hardware and software that
is compatible or certified have a much different experience.

"DanS" wrote:

> Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote in
> news:6oqj539560ks7ee1k6dgk4sqvm4p81gn1m@4ax.com:
>
> > This is mainly of interest to people that use Agent as their news
> > reader and download multi-part large files. I have used Agent for more
> > years than I can remember and till yesterday haven't upgraded for a
> > long time. Shame on me.
> >
> > Geez... boy, did they improve it!
> >
> > I heard good things about version 4.2, (tuned for Vista) so had to try
> > for myself, only $15 for a upgrade. They totally redid the interface
> > from what it was years back, but added a lot of really cool features
> > like support for multiple threading within a single instance.

>
> They *just* added multi-threaded downloads ?
>
> >
> > I have broadband and I use a premium news server, so your results may
> > not be as super.
> >
> > Under the old version of Agent I thought it was smoking if it even
> > just rarely ran at about 35 MB a minute, which is pretty fast file
> > transfer over the Usenet even with broadband since the premium news
> > server I'm using typically has 25,000 or more connections going.
> >
> > Today I set a new speed record, a whopping 1.1 MB a second! That's
> > right; over a MB a second transfer speed, in part since Agent now will
> > do multi-threading with just one connection, so it was doing up to
> > nine downloads off the same news server (they allow up to 10
> > connections) at once without me having to run multiple instances or
> > set anything special up. That delivered a blistering fast 64 MB a
> > minute download speed meaning it took me just a tad over 3 minutes to
> > download a 19 minute movie weighting at about 170 MB. Not bad
> > performance. ;-)
> >
> > Just curious... anybody getting similar performance with other news
> > readers/news servers?
> >
> > http://www.usenetserver.com/networkstatus.html
> >
> > Of course it don't hurt if the news server farm is outputing close to
> > 20 gbps.
> >

>
> Won't hurt either if your pipe is that fat.
> 64 MB/min = 1.06 MB/sec = 8.5 Mbits/sec + overhead = VERY fast regardless
> of the OS.
>
> I'd be interested to see what the difference is between Agent and
> NewsLeecher with the same number of D/L threads to the same servers.
>
> Of course, now the obligatory knock about the subject != the content of
> the thread. It should have read 'Agent can be fast...', as we are talking
> about a completely new version of an application.
>

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-28-2007
Tiberius
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Holy Cow Batman, Vista can be fast...
why? I dont think Im old and I remember that...


"Mr. Arnold" <MR. Arnold@Arnold.com> wrote in message
news:uTkz3OLoHHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Holy Cow Batman? You must be older than dirt, like me.



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-28-2007
Tiberius
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Holy Cow Batman, Vista can be fast...
I thought it had a better interface than the last one I tried..

sorry still horrible and old fashion interface.. lol I think I tried 4.x
before
and droped it because of its interface..
sure its the most powerfull newsreader in the world....

and I should be using it.. but I want a nicer interface...

NOT vistafied please!


"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
news:6oqj539560ks7ee1k6dgk4sqvm4p81gn1m@4ax.com...
> This is mainly of interest to people that use Agent as their news
> reader and download multi-part large files. I have used Agent for more
> years than I can remember and till yesterday haven't upgraded for a
> long time. Shame on me.
>
> Geez... boy, did they improve it!
>
> I heard good things about version 4.2, (tuned for Vista) so had to try
> for myself, only $15 for a upgrade. They totally redid the interface
> from what it was years back, but added a lot of really cool features
> like support for multiple threading within a single instance.
>
> I have broadband and I use a premium news server, so your results may
> not be as super.
>
> Under the old version of Agent I thought it was smoking if it even
> just rarely ran at about 35 MB a minute, which is pretty fast file
> transfer over the Usenet even with broadband since the premium news
> server I'm using typically has 25,000 or more connections going.
>
> Today I set a new speed record, a whopping 1.1 MB a second! That's
> right; over a MB a second transfer speed, in part since Agent now will
> do multi-threading with just one connection, so it was doing up to
> nine downloads off the same news server (they allow up to 10
> connections) at once without me having to run multiple instances or
> set anything special up. That delivered a blistering fast 64 MB a
> minute download speed meaning it took me just a tad over 3 minutes to
> download a 19 minute movie weighting at about 170 MB. Not bad
> performance. ;-)
>
> Just curious... anybody getting similar performance with other news
> readers/news servers?
>
> http://www.usenetserver.com/networkstatus.html
>
> Of course it don't hurt if the news server farm is outputing close to
> 20 gbps.
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-28-2007
Stephan Rose
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Holy Cow Batman, Vista can be fast...
Adam Albright wrote:

> This is mainly of interest to people that use Agent as their news
> reader and download multi-part large files. I have used Agent for more
> years than I can remember and till yesterday haven't upgraded for a
> long time. Shame on me.
>
> Geez... boy, did they improve it!
>
> I heard good things about version 4.2, (tuned for Vista) so had to try
> for myself, only $15 for a upgrade. They totally redid the interface
> from what it was years back, but added a lot of really cool features
> like support for multiple threading within a single instance.
>
> I have broadband and I use a premium news server, so your results may
> not be as super.
>
> Under the old version of Agent I thought it was smoking if it even
> just rarely ran at about 35 MB a minute, which is pretty fast file
> transfer over the Usenet even with broadband since the premium news
> server I'm using typically has 25,000 or more connections going.
>
> Today I set a new speed record, a whopping 1.1 MB a second! That's
> right; over a MB a second transfer speed, in part since Agent now will
> do multi-threading with just one connection, so it was doing up to
> nine downloads off the same news server (they allow up to 10
> connections) at once without me having to run multiple instances or
> set anything special up. That delivered a blistering fast 64 MB a
> minute download speed meaning it took me just a tad over 3 minutes to
> download a 19 minute movie weighting at about 170 MB. Not bad
> performance. ;-)
>
> Just curious... anybody getting similar performance with other news
> readers/news servers?
>
> http://www.usenetserver.com/networkstatus.html
>
> Of course it don't hurt if the news server farm is outputing close to
> 20 gbps.


Well don't give Vista credit for that. Give the multi-threaded downloading
credit for that. Since 1 file is usually composed of many small parts,
downloading only 1 part at a time is bad for bandwidth since everytime it
has to request a new part the connection sits idle (latency). Multi
threaded downloads allow it to run multiple requests at once so it is
always downloading something and never stalls requesting a new part.

--
Stephan
2003 Yamaha R6

君のこと思い出す日なんてないのは
君のこと忘れたときがないから
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Holy X#@$% - Microsoft at it again Spanky deMonkey microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 11 04-24-2007 02:18
Vista: Whatever happened to fast boot? kirk jim microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 11 04-14-2007 13:18
XP twice as fast as vista kirk jim microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 54 04-05-2007 16:27
Is KDE 4.0 the Holy Grail of Desktops? Steve General Technology News 0 03-29-2007 16:57
How to make XP as fast as vista? kirk jim microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 6 03-21-2007 20:37




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:18.




Driver Scanner - Free Scan Now

Vistaheads.com is part of the Heads Network. See also XPHeads.com and Win7Heads.com.


Funny Commercials to make you laugh :-)

Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119