Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads
Recommended Download - Clean, repair and optimize your system



Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now

Vista requirements =Further question

microsoft.public.windows.vista.general




Recommended Fix - Fix Vista Errors and Optimize Performance

Click On Your Flag for Translation
Simplified Chinese French Spanish Italian Portugeuse Japanese German Dutch
Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now
Reply
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007
Gerry Cornell
 

Posts: n/a
Vista requirements =Further question
It has been suggested that installing a graphics card for use instead
of relying on the inbuilt graphics facility is to be recommended if I
dual boot Windows Vista Ultimate Edition with Windows XP Home Edition.
This would be added along with adding a further 512 mb DRAM to the 512
mb already installed.

Comments and suggestions please.

TIA


--

~~~~

Gerry

~~~~~~~~
Enquire, plan and execute.
Stourport, England
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007
VicTek
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Vista requirements =Further question

"Gerry Cornell" <gcjc@tenretnitb.com> wrote in message
news:eVeE%2365RHHA.1600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> It has been suggested that installing a graphics card for use instead of
> relying on the inbuilt graphics facility is to be recommended if I dual
> boot Windows Vista Ultimate Edition with Windows XP Home Edition. This
> would be added along with adding a further 512 mb DRAM to the 512 mb
> already installed.
>
> Comments and suggestions please.
>
> TIA
>
> Gerry


Well, replacing built-in graphics with a graphics card can improve
performance since the built-in graphics adapter is usually "low end". You
would want to research this though, to get the best bang for the buck.
Specifically, make sure that the video adapter has at least 128megs of ram
which is the minimum to turn on the Aero interface. The other advantage is
that whatever system memory the built-in graphics adapter was using becomes
available to the system. Regarding the 512mg ram upgrade, I would say
that's a very good idea. I would not run Vista with less then 1gb. Good
luck.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007
Gerry Cornell
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Vista requirements =Further question
Thanks Vic for your comments.


--

Regards.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


VicTek wrote:
> "Gerry Cornell" <gcjc@tenretnitb.com> wrote in message
> news:eVeE%2365RHHA.1600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> It has been suggested that installing a graphics card for use
>> instead of relying on the inbuilt graphics facility is to be
>> recommended if I dual boot Windows Vista Ultimate Edition with
>> Windows XP Home Edition. This would be added along with adding a
>> further 512 mb DRAM to the 512 mb already installed.
>>
>> Comments and suggestions please.
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Gerry

>
> Well, replacing built-in graphics with a graphics card can improve
> performance since the built-in graphics adapter is usually "low
> end". You would want to research this though, to get the best
> bang for the buck. Specifically, make sure that the video adapter
> has at least 128megs of ram which is the minimum to turn on the
> Aero interface. The other advantage is that whatever system
> memory the built-in graphics adapter was using becomes available
> to the system. Regarding the 512mg ram upgrade, I would say
> that's a very good idea. I would not run Vista with less then
> 1gb. Good luck.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual boot system question and family deal discount question =?Utf-8?B?QmV0YXRlc3Rlcnp6?= microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 4 03-01-2007 03:42
Windows Vista requirements?? kraut microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 17 03-01-2007 02:59
What are the requirements for using Aero? Steve Johnson microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 2 02-28-2007 22:13
Concurrent Sessions, Vista, and Logo Requirements. =?Utf-8?B?YWxlZQ==?= microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 3 02-28-2007 20:39
Requirements for a Classic Clean Install of Vista. Colin Barnhorst microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 4 02-28-2007 20:00




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:17.




Driver Scanner - Free Scan Now

Vistaheads.com is part of the Heads Network. See also XPHeads.com and Win7Heads.com.


Funny Commercials to make you laugh :-)

Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119