Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads
Recommended Download - Clean, repair and optimize your system



Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now

Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?

microsoft.public.windows.vista.general




Recommended Fix - Fix Vista Errors and Optimize Performance

Click On Your Flag for Translation
Simplified Chinese French Spanish Italian Portugeuse Japanese German Dutch
Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now
Reply
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
Alias
 

Posts: n/a
Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
Think again:

<http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r>

Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies, straw
man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but their
initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.

Alias
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
Alias
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
STAN STARINSKI wrote:
> Ever wondered why so little effort is invested into hacking Linux?
>
> Because its small customer base is worthless by numbers alone, moreover
> by the importance of those customers it's EVEN SMALLER.
> What I mean is its "customers" are nonpaying Teenagers, self-professed
> wacko geeks, anti-"greedy corporations" zealots usually under 30 years
> old who're yet to find out that corporations are the reason their
> country is powerful and can design/produce great stuff, ands only a few
> Linux users are trully doing it for the sake of themselves.
> The rest are just trying to wipe Microsoft's nose with a 16-year old
> philosophy "I am not like them".
>
> Youre'a bona fide Liar.
> You make money by paid/long-term support of Ubuntu, courtesy of Mike
> Shuttleworth, a South African entrpreneur.
> P.S. if I use Linux it would be NovellSUSE & I'd be *amned if I run a
> critically important application on it, for a Netbook it might be OK,
> but seriou sbusiness - not.


Hi Polly, want a cracker?

Alias
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
Kevin SmallBone
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?


"Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hcsn15$n3g$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> STAN STARINSKI wrote:
>> Ever wondered why so little effort is invested into hacking Linux?
>>
>> Because its small customer base is worthless by numbers alone, moreover
>> by the importance of those customers it's EVEN SMALLER.
>> What I mean is its "customers" are nonpaying Teenagers, self-professed
>> wacko geeks, anti-"greedy corporations" zealots usually under 30 years
>> old who're yet to find out that corporations are the reason their country
>> is powerful and can design/produce great stuff, ands only a few Linux
>> users are trully doing it for the sake of themselves.
>> The rest are just trying to wipe Microsoft's nose with a 16-year old
>> philosophy "I am not like them".
>>
>> Youre'a bona fide Liar.
>> You make money by paid/long-term support of Ubuntu, courtesy of Mike
>> Shuttleworth, a South African entrpreneur.
>> P.S. if I use Linux it would be NovellSUSE & I'd be *amned if I run a
>> critically important application on it, for a Netbook it might be OK, but
>> seriou sbusiness - not.

>
> Hi Polly, want a cracker?
>
> Alias


That's all you've got? Figures. What a loser.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
Frank
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
Alias wrote:
> STAN STARINSKI wrote:
>> Ever wondered why so little effort is invested into hacking Linux?
>>
>> Because its small customer base is worthless by numbers alone,
>> moreover by the importance of those customers it's EVEN SMALLER.
>> What I mean is its "customers" are nonpaying Teenagers, self-professed
>> wacko geeks, anti-"greedy corporations" zealots usually under 30 years
>> old who're yet to find out that corporations are the reason their
>> country is powerful and can design/produce great stuff, ands only a
>> few Linux users are trully doing it for the sake of themselves.
>> The rest are just trying to wipe Microsoft's nose with a 16-year old
>> philosophy "I am not like them".
>>
>> Youre'a bona fide Liar.
>> You make money by paid/long-term support of Ubuntu, courtesy of Mike
>> Shuttleworth, a South African entrpreneur.
>> P.S. if I use Linux it would be NovellSUSE & I'd be *amned if I run a
>> critically important application on it, for a Netbook it might be OK,
>> but seriou sbusiness - not.

>
> Hi Polly, want a cracker?
>


So you're Polly and you have the crackers, huh?
Oops!!!...LOL!


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Kevin SmallBone
 

Posts: n/a
The Subject of the post goes here
The subject line is to describe the post.

Where I am typing now is the BODY of the post.

You put the body in the subject line. That isn't normal posting, also,
running sentences together is not normal. That means you must not be
normal. Please schedule an appointment with your psychiatrist and discuss
your anger and mental issues prior to posting again.

Thank you.


"Kevin John Panzke" <kevin.panzke@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a31a95b4-1a73-4f9e-86c2-7b78a1f3d7ac@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> Alias wrote: > Think again: > > <http://www.computerworld.com/s/
> article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r> >
>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,

> straw > man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
> their > initials are Frank and The Nymshifter. > > Alias


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Alias
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
Mr. Arnold wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Think again:
>>
>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r>
>>
>>
>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but their
>> initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>

>
>
> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>
> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>


Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.

Alias
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Frank
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
Alias wrote:
> Mr. Arnold wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Think again:
>>>
>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
>>> their initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>>

>>
>>
>> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>>
>> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>

>
> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
>
> Alias


Neither is Vista or Windows 7 but how many are running as admin/root huh?
Oops!!!...LOL!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Death
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
Alias wrote:

SNIP

>
> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run, moron.
>
> Alias


True, True.
Takes some tinkering.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Mr. Arnold
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
Alias wrote:
> Mr. Arnold wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Think again:
>>>
>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
>>> their initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>>

>>
>>
>> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>>
>> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>

>
> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
>
> Alias


And you're talking out the side of your head as usual.

You show some kind if proof, instead of your lip service about how Linux
can protect itself.

Linux can no more protect itself from user actions than the man in the
Moon. And Linux doesn't need any help either by the user, since it's
swiss cheese too. Linux only saving grace is it's 'security by oblivion'
for it.

God didn't make Linux. Man made Linux And man is fallible.

Yeah Alias, you drop your linen and keep on grinnin about something made
by man.

<http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Hole-in-the-Linux-kernel-allows-root-access-850016.html>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
STAN STARINSKI
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
LOL you've just responded to yourself
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vista, Windows Firewall, Windows Defender, UAC, Avast - is this fairly secure, or is anything else needed? Advice appreciated. Tuttle microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 10 1 Week Ago 10:18
Displaying Non-Secure Stuff on a Secure Site TL microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general 4 05-25-2009 22:00
Secure applications in a secure ecosystem: the next challenge Paul Security News 0 07-06-2007 18:14
Off the wire: Secure applications in a secure ecosystem: the next challenge Steve Security News 0 07-06-2007 14:53
A secure Internet requires a secure network protocol Paul Security News 0 06-22-2007 18:53




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:48.




Driver Scanner - Free Scan Now

Vistaheads.com is part of the Heads Network. See also XPHeads.com and Win7Heads.com.


Funny Commercials to make you laugh :-)

Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119