Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
|
|
Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
|
Click On Your Flag for Translation
|

3 Weeks Ago
|
|
|
|
Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
Think again:
<http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r>
Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies, straw
man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but their
initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
Alias
|
|

3 Weeks Ago
|
|
|
|
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
STAN STARINSKI wrote:
> Ever wondered why so little effort is invested into hacking Linux?
>
> Because its small customer base is worthless by numbers alone, moreover
> by the importance of those customers it's EVEN SMALLER.
> What I mean is its "customers" are nonpaying Teenagers, self-professed
> wacko geeks, anti-"greedy corporations" zealots usually under 30 years
> old who're yet to find out that corporations are the reason their
> country is powerful and can design/produce great stuff, ands only a few
> Linux users are trully doing it for the sake of themselves.
> The rest are just trying to wipe Microsoft's nose with a 16-year old
> philosophy "I am not like them".
>
> Youre'a bona fide Liar.
> You make money by paid/long-term support of Ubuntu, courtesy of Mike
> Shuttleworth, a South African entrpreneur.
> P.S. if I use Linux it would be NovellSUSE & I'd be *amned if I run a
> critically important application on it, for a Netbook it might be OK,
> but seriou sbusiness - not.
Hi Polly, want a cracker?
Alias
|
|

3 Weeks Ago
|
|
|
|
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
"Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hcsn15$n3g$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> STAN STARINSKI wrote:
>> Ever wondered why so little effort is invested into hacking Linux?
>>
>> Because its small customer base is worthless by numbers alone, moreover
>> by the importance of those customers it's EVEN SMALLER.
>> What I mean is its "customers" are nonpaying Teenagers, self-professed
>> wacko geeks, anti-"greedy corporations" zealots usually under 30 years
>> old who're yet to find out that corporations are the reason their country
>> is powerful and can design/produce great stuff, ands only a few Linux
>> users are trully doing it for the sake of themselves.
>> The rest are just trying to wipe Microsoft's nose with a 16-year old
>> philosophy "I am not like them".
>>
>> Youre'a bona fide Liar.
>> You make money by paid/long-term support of Ubuntu, courtesy of Mike
>> Shuttleworth, a South African entrpreneur.
>> P.S. if I use Linux it would be NovellSUSE & I'd be *amned if I run a
>> critically important application on it, for a Netbook it might be OK, but
>> seriou sbusiness - not.
>
> Hi Polly, want a cracker?
>
> Alias
That's all you've got? Figures. What a loser.
|
|

3 Weeks Ago
|
|
|
|
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
Alias wrote:
> STAN STARINSKI wrote:
>> Ever wondered why so little effort is invested into hacking Linux?
>>
>> Because its small customer base is worthless by numbers alone,
>> moreover by the importance of those customers it's EVEN SMALLER.
>> What I mean is its "customers" are nonpaying Teenagers, self-professed
>> wacko geeks, anti-"greedy corporations" zealots usually under 30 years
>> old who're yet to find out that corporations are the reason their
>> country is powerful and can design/produce great stuff, ands only a
>> few Linux users are trully doing it for the sake of themselves.
>> The rest are just trying to wipe Microsoft's nose with a 16-year old
>> philosophy "I am not like them".
>>
>> Youre'a bona fide Liar.
>> You make money by paid/long-term support of Ubuntu, courtesy of Mike
>> Shuttleworth, a South African entrpreneur.
>> P.S. if I use Linux it would be NovellSUSE & I'd be *amned if I run a
>> critically important application on it, for a Netbook it might be OK,
>> but seriou sbusiness - not.
>
> Hi Polly, want a cracker?
>
So you're Polly and you have the crackers, huh?
Oops!!!...LOL!
|
|

2 Weeks Ago
|
|
|
|
The Subject of the post goes here
The subject line is to describe the post.
Where I am typing now is the BODY of the post.
You put the body in the subject line. That isn't normal posting, also,
running sentences together is not normal. That means you must not be
normal. Please schedule an appointment with your psychiatrist and discuss
your anger and mental issues prior to posting again.
Thank you.
"Kevin John Panzke" <kevin.panzke@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a31a95b4-1a73-4f9e-86c2-7b78a1f3d7ac@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> Alias wrote: > Think again: > > <http://www.computerworld.com/s/
> article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r> >
>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
> straw > man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
> their > initials are Frank and The Nymshifter. > > Alias
|
|

2 Weeks Ago
|
|
|
|
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
Mr. Arnold wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Think again:
>>
>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r>
>>
>>
>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but their
>> initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>
>
>
> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>
> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>
Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
Alias
|
|

2 Weeks Ago
|
|
|
|
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
Alias wrote:
> Mr. Arnold wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Think again:
>>>
>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
>>> their initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>>
>>
>>
>> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>>
>> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>
>
> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
>
> Alias
Neither is Vista or Windows 7 but how many are running as admin/root huh?
Oops!!!...LOL!
|
|

2 Weeks Ago
|
|
|
|
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
Alias wrote:
SNIP
>
> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run, moron.
>
> Alias
True, True.
Takes some tinkering.
|
|

2 Weeks Ago
|
|
|
|
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
Alias wrote:
> Mr. Arnold wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Think again:
>>>
>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
>>> their initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>>
>>
>>
>> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>>
>> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>
>
> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
>
> Alias
And you're talking out the side of your head as usual.
You show some kind if proof, instead of your lip service about how Linux
can protect itself.
Linux can no more protect itself from user actions than the man in the
Moon. And Linux doesn't need any help either by the user, since it's
swiss cheese too. Linux only saving grace is it's 'security by oblivion'
for it.
God didn't make Linux. Man made Linux And man is fallible.
Yeah Alias, you drop your linen and keep on grinnin about something made
by man.
<http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Hole-in-the-Linux-kernel-allows-root-access-850016.html>
|
|

2 Weeks Ago
|
|
|
|
Re: Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?
LOL you've just responded to yourself
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:48.
|
|