Do You Think Windows 7 is Secure?

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Mr. Arnold wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>> Think again:
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>>>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
>>>> their initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>>>
>>> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>
>>
>> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
>> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Neither is Vista or Windows 7 but how many are running as admin/root huh?
> Oops!!!...LOL!

You can't tell someone like Alias anything, as Alias buried its head in
the sand long ago about something made by man.

Mr. Arnold wrote:
>
> Alias wrote:
>> Mr. Arnold wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>> Think again:
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>>>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
>>>> their initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>>>
>>> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>
>>
>> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
>> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
>>
>> Alias
>
> And you're talking out the side of your head as usual.
>
> You show some kind if proof, instead of your lip service about how Linux
> can protect itself.
>
> Linux can no more protect itself from user actions than the man in the
> Moon. And Linux doesn't need any help either by the user, since it's
> swiss cheese too. Linux only saving grace is it's 'security by oblivion'
> for it.
>
> God didn't make Linux. Man made Linux And man is fallible.
>
> Yeah Alias, you drop your linen and keep on grinnin about something made
> by man.
>
> <http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Hole-in-the-Linux-kernel-allows-root-access-850016.html>
>
>
>

And how, pray tell, do you plan to run someone else's computer at root
level without being in front of the computer?

Alias

Mr. Arnold wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Mr. Arnold wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>> Think again:
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researche r>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>>>>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
>>>>> their initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>
>>>
>>> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
>>> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>> Neither is Vista or Windows 7 but how many are running as admin/root huh?
>> Oops!!!...LOL!
>
> You can't tell someone like Alias anything, as Alias buried its head in
> the sand long ago about something made by man.

Nothing is fallible, true, but Linux is far more secure than Windows.
Full stop.

Alias

Kevin SmallBone wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hcsn15$n3g$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> STAN STARINSKI wrote:
>>> Ever wondered why so little effort is invested into hacking Linux?
>>>
>>> Because its small customer base is worthless by numbers alone,
>>> moreover by the importance of those customers it's EVEN SMALLER.
>>> What I mean is its "customers" are nonpaying Teenagers,
>>> self-professed wacko geeks, anti-"greedy corporations" zealots
>>> usually under 30 years old who're yet to find out that corporations
>>> are the reason their country is powerful and can design/produce great
>>> stuff, ands only a few Linux users are trully doing it for the sake
>>> of themselves.
>>> The rest are just trying to wipe Microsoft's nose with a 16-year old
>>> philosophy "I am not like them".
>>>
>>> Youre'a bona fide Liar.
>>> You make money by paid/long-term support of Ubuntu, courtesy of Mike
>>> Shuttleworth, a South African entrpreneur.
>>> P.S. if I use Linux it would be NovellSUSE & I'd be *amned if I run a
>>> critically important application on it, for a Netbook it might be OK,
>>> but seriou sbusiness - not.
>>
>> Hi Polly, want a cracker?
>>
>> Alias
>
> That's all you've got? Figures. What a loser.
>
>

You're the one acting like a parrot. I am merely pointing it out. Do you
*ever* have an original thought?

Alias

Alias wrote:

<snipped>
<yawn>

You're an idiot Alias. You go put your false god Linux, a bunch of
programs written by man, on a pedestal and you worship it with zeal.

Alias wrote:

<snipped>
<yawn>
<not read>

You are worthless Alias go worship Linux.

Mr. Arnold wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
> <snipped>
> <yawn>
> <not read>

Head/sand, speaking of worthless.

>
> You are worthless Alias go worship Linux.

I don't worship an operating system. You do?

Alias

Mr. Arnold wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
> <snipped>
> <yawn>
>
> You're an idiot Alias. You go put your false god Linux, a bunch of
> programs written by man, on a pedestal and you worship it with zeal.

You didn't know the answer again, eh, and lamely try to cover it up with
an insult.

Oh, and, sorry, but a God or gods don't exist.

Alias

Mr. Arnold wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
> <snipped>
> <yawn>
>
> Ubuntu 9.10 is causing outrage and frustration, with early adopters
> wishing they'd stuck with previous versions of the Linux distro.
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11...a_frustration/
>
>

I personally know dozens of people who are not having problems. Taking a
poll at a forum where problems are discussed is not a good poll but that
won't stop you from posting it like a windroid.

Alias

Mr. Arnold wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
> <snipped>
> <yawn>
>
> Ubuntu 9.10 is causing outrage and frustration, with early adopters
> wishing they'd stuck with previous versions of the Linux distro.
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11...a_frustration/


I personally know dozens of people who are not having problems. Taking a
poll at a forum where problems are discussed is not a good poll but that
won't stop you from posting it like a windroid.

Alias