i hate Vista

"JEWboy" <satanpennus@fokfreetrade.com> wrote in message
news:%23d2Wiv%23%23JHA.1492@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl.. .
> How would you feel when after a shutdown, or next morning, or at random
> during a runnign session, numerous WinExplorer folders change
> listing/sroting appearance to what imbecile progreammer likes, and NOT
> what you left at last time?
>
> How DID it feel when in WindowsXP you set it once and you can be assured
> for sometimes a year, not to waste time on resorting and changing listing
> back to LIST and not "medium icons" appearance.
> Who is the degenerate moron programming WinExplorer to be a piece of such
> trash comparing to WindowsXP.
>
> You don't have an answer, MS-funded, fanatic Vista promoter MVP, you don't
> want to admit this is garbage.
>
> And is the reason businesses stayed away from Vista for 2 years.
>
> WinExplorer is one of the central pieces of GUI, screw it up one mroe time
> in Windws7 and expect your revenues to fall further.


You admittedly are unemployable.
Your opinion is moot.

I set WinExplorer for Details, grouped by file type, and it always shows
that.
Perhaps you messed something up.

"JEWboy" <satanpennus@fokfreetrade.com> wrote in message
news:uy1j96%23%23JHA.4560@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
> And to top this:
>
> Once in a few days, a Quicklaunch button I programmed to open WinExplorer
> in a certain folder, launches WinExplorer in random location/random window
> size.

That's why you label yourself a software engineer?
That's not programming.
That's creating a shortcut.

> It simply forgets last (MAXIMIZED) size, because of an idiotic code that
> disregards customer settings.
>
> And don't tell me about BagsRMU or whatever, first I had nothing todo
> about it in WinXPSP2, second it's not the cause in Vista.
> More important is that it was set once in WinXP, in Vista I find myself
> spending time on absoluetly retarded activities.
>
> When you see "Vista Business" edition, it's an oxymoron. I have
> Ultimate, it's an ultimate waste of PRODUCTIVITY.
> It was designed for home users & gamers to spend a life on a computer,
> instead of getting real work done.

Speaking of getting work done... have you looked into babysitting yet?
You should.

"JEWboy" <satanpennus@fokfreetrade.com> wrote in message
news:uEmMNF$%23JHA.3708@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> How about Vista utiltiies (Control panel, networks, printers, etc)
> forgetting window size at random? Not just WinExplorer.
> But that's fine, because after all we don't go there often.
>
> However, when WinExplorer is programmed to start with a certain
> view/folder open (for example: %SystemRoot%\explorer.exe /e, /root,
> C:\zJOBS\zNEWEST-zReducedContr)
> it works for like a few hours, and then suddenly forgets window size, or
> sorting, listing or just turns on "tags" and turns off "type"
>
> WHO DA HELL NEEDS GOD DA***MN TAGS EVER? Who added this useless stuff
> into WinExploer, OK OK you can keep it.
> But why do you turn off "Type" column because it's all pictures and you
> THINK I don't need Type column, yet I need tags or "date picture taken".
>
> They can shove this Explorer in their rear exit.

By the way, where is their rear exit? I didn't see one last time Vista
started. Is this some mysterious exit that only you and the space alians
know about?

"JEWboy" <satanpennus@fokfreetrade.com> wrote in message
news:uEmMNF$%23JHA.3708@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> How about Vista utiltiies (Control panel, networks, printers, etc)
> forgetting window size at random? Not just WinExplorer.
> But that's fine, because after all we don't go there often.
>
> However, when WinExplorer is programmed to start with a certain
> view/folder open (for example: %SystemRoot%\explorer.exe /e, /root,
> C:\zJOBS\zNEWEST-zReducedContr)
> it works for like a few hours, and then suddenly forgets window size, or
> sorting, listing or just turns on "tags" and turns off "type"
>
> WHO DA HELL NEEDS GOD DA***MN TAGS EVER? Who added this useless stuff
> into WinExploer, OK OK you can keep it.
> But why do you turn off "Type" column because it's all pictures and you
> THINK I don't need Type column, yet I need tags or "date picture taken".
>
> They can shove this Explorer in their rear exit.


Look into editing desktop.ini files.
If you manually edit them in folders giving you trouble, that may help.

"JEWboy" <satanpennus@fokfreetrade.com> wrote in message
news:%23d2Wiv%23%23JHA.1492@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl.. .
> How would you feel when after a shutdown, or next morning, or at random
> during a runnign session, numerous WinExplorer folders change
> listing/sroting appearance to what imbecile progreammer likes, and NOT
> what you left at last time?
>
> How DID it feel when in WindowsXP you set it once and you can be assured
> for sometimes a year, not to waste time on resorting and changing listing
> back to LIST and not "medium icons" appearance.
> Who is the degenerate moron programming WinExplorer to be a piece of such
> trash comparing to WindowsXP.
>
> You don't have an answer, MS-funded, fanatic Vista promoter MVP, you don't
> want to admit this is garbage.
>
> And is the reason businesses stayed away from Vista for 2 years.
>
> WinExplorer is one of the central pieces of GUI, screw it up one mroe time
> in Windws7 and expect your revenues to fall further.

If I was as intelligent as you (think you are), I'd stop posting about Vista
and create my own OS.
Give it a try, moron, and return here in a couple hundred years with your
results.
--

Don't pick a fight with an old man.
If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.

How would you feel when after a shutdown, or next morning, or at random
during a runnign session, numerous WinExplorer folders change
listing/sroting appearance to what imbecile progreammer likes, and NOT what
you left at last time?

How DID it feel when in WindowsXP you set it once and you can be assured for
sometimes a year, not to waste time on resorting and changing listing back
to LIST and not "medium icons" appearance.
Who is the degenerate moron programming WinExplorer to be a piece of such
trash comparing to WindowsXP.

You don't have an answer, MS-funded, fanatic Vista promoter MVP, you don't
want to admit this is garbage.

And is the reason businesses stayed away from Vista for 2 years.

WinExplorer is one of the central pieces of GUI, screw it up one mroe time
in Windws7 and expect your revenues to fall further.

"JEWboy" <satanpennus@fokfreetrade.com> wrote in message
news:e5zLOa$%23JHA.4524@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> have you looked into babysitting yet? You should.
>
> You need help when parents leave you alone?


lol.

JEWboy wrote:
> How would you feel when after a shutdown, or next morning, or at random
> during a runnign session, numerous WinExplorer folders change
> listing/sroting appearance to what imbecile progreammer likes, and NOT
> what you left at last time?

This happens to me occasionally, it is a minor annoyance at most but an
annoyance none the less.

And to top this:

Once in a few days, a Quicklaunch button I programmed to open WinExplorer in
a certain folder, launches WinExplorer in random location/random window
size.
It simply forgets last (MAXIMIZED) size, because of an idiotic code that
disregards customer settings.

And don't tell me about BagsRMU or whatever, first I had nothing todo about
it in WinXPSP2, second it's not the cause in Vista.
More important is that it was set once in WinXP, in Vista I find myself
spending time on absoluetly retarded activities.

When you see "Vista Business" edition, it's an oxymoron. I have Ultimate,
it's an ultimate waste of PRODUCTIVITY.
It was designed for home users & gamers to spend a life on a computer,
instead of getting real work done.

WELL I WANT ALL FOLDERS TO BE IN "LIST" APPEARANS, NOT DETAILS! Whether it
be binaries, text, PDF, Word docs, JPG, I want all be in list mode and it
persistently goes back to what Vista likes regardless of List template
applied to all folder/filetypes.

OK, and details view is something I've been using upto WinXP and stopped as
background color of the column by which files are sorted is white with white
fonts, so becomes invisible in my system-wide color scheme where background
is BLACK, Windows enforces white background in this spot disregarding
system-wide setting.
That is a separate issue (now plaguing WInMail also, unlike OutlookExpress).

The fact is WinExplorer forgets view settings at random, and if it doesn't
on your machine, then maybe you're using something Vista programmers used as
default anyway.

The fact is many people hate Vista Explorer.