Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads
Recommended Download - Clean, repair and optimize your system



Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now

System Restore Size....HDD

microsoft.public.windows.vista.general




Recommended Fix - Fix Vista Errors and Optimize Performance

Click On Your Flag for Translation
Simplified Chinese French Spanish Italian Portugeuse Japanese German Dutch
Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now
Reply
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2009
denmarfl
 

Posts: n/a
Re: System Restore Size....HDD
What will be of interest is how large your Restore get over the next week or
so....as I wrote in the beginning, my Restore Points following the Install of
Vista SP2 grew from Restore points that were a round 1 GB a week in total to
3 to 4 GB daily. That is the reason I started this thread.......

"Doug" wrote:

> "Manny Weisbord" <mannyweisbord@crimest.invalid> wrote in message
> news:j69355thiea4ekqe8lg4lhra1ktfpp8v9v@4ax.com...
> > "Doug" <doug@FAKEpleasereplytogroup.com> wrote:
> >
> >>I am concerned at the suggestion that if the Page File is to perform its
> >>intended role it must be in the Root Drive. I have always put it on a
> >>different drive imagining that with two drives working cooperatively it
> >>speeds everything up, and am reluctant to give up that notion on the basis
> >>of a report of advice given on a Microsoft helpline without further
> >>verification. I shall be interested to learn the current truth of the
> >>matter.
> >>
> >>Four weeks ago I was chided on this NG for mentioning that, with my RAM
> >>increased to 4 GB, I had given up using a swap file. The consensus was
> >>always use a swap file and leave Vista to choose its size, so I mended my
> >>ways and now have it, though NOT on my root drive. Since then some
> >>processes, such as Vista's Disk Cleanup, seem to take twice as long as
> >>they
> >>did with no swap file, and generally things seem a little more sluggish. I
> >>had imagined they would be even more sluggish if all the frantic disk
> >>activity were confined to a single HDD, but I could well be wrong about
> >>that, particularly if Vista is having to make compromises because the swap
> >>file is on the *wrong* drive.
> >>
> >>Doug

> >
> > These sites might be helpful (or might confuse you more):
> >
> > http://maximumpcguides.com/windows-v...s-paging-file/
> >
> > http://tweakhound.com/vista/tweakguide/page_6.htm
> >
> > http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/0...ing-file-size/

>
> Thanks Manny, most interesting and useful.
> Under the illusion that I am no longer confused I have settled for:
> Drive C: a static swap file of 4605 MB
> Drive D: a static swap file of 4605 MB
> 4605 MB was the figure recommended by Vista.
> Vista should then be able to use the 9210 MB of available virtual memory any
> way it pleases with minimum impact on anything else. Hopefully all will now
> run sweetly till I upgrade to Windows 7 Home Premium.
>
>

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2009
Manny Weisbord
 

Posts: n/a
Re: System Restore Size....HDD
"Doug" <doug@FAKEpleasereplytogroup.com> wrote:

>"Manny Weisbord" <mannyweisbord@crimest.invalid> wrote in message
>news:j69355thiea4ekqe8lg4lhra1ktfpp8v9v@4ax.com.. .
>> "Doug" <doug@FAKEpleasereplytogroup.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I am concerned at the suggestion that if the Page File is to perform its
>>>intended role it must be in the Root Drive. I have always put it on a
>>>different drive imagining that with two drives working cooperatively it
>>>speeds everything up, and am reluctant to give up that notion on the basis
>>>of a report of advice given on a Microsoft helpline without further
>>>verification. I shall be interested to learn the current truth of the
>>>matter.
>>>
>>>Four weeks ago I was chided on this NG for mentioning that, with my RAM
>>>increased to 4 GB, I had given up using a swap file. The consensus was
>>>always use a swap file and leave Vista to choose its size, so I mended my
>>>ways and now have it, though NOT on my root drive. Since then some
>>>processes, such as Vista's Disk Cleanup, seem to take twice as long as
>>>they
>>>did with no swap file, and generally things seem a little more sluggish. I
>>>had imagined they would be even more sluggish if all the frantic disk
>>>activity were confined to a single HDD, but I could well be wrong about
>>>that, particularly if Vista is having to make compromises because the swap
>>>file is on the *wrong* drive.
>>>
>>>Doug

>>
>> These sites might be helpful (or might confuse you more):
>>
>> http://maximumpcguides.com/windows-v...s-paging-file/
>>
>> http://tweakhound.com/vista/tweakguide/page_6.htm
>>
>> http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/0...ing-file-size/

>
>Thanks Manny, most interesting and useful.
>Under the illusion that I am no longer confused I have settled for:
>Drive C: a static swap file of 4605 MB
>Drive D: a static swap file of 4605 MB
>4605 MB was the figure recommended by Vista.
>Vista should then be able to use the 9210 MB of available virtual memory any
>way it pleases with minimum impact on anything else. Hopefully all will now
>run sweetly till I upgrade to Windows 7 Home Premium.


You now have the same setup I have. :-)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Limiting the size of the System Restore files w/Vista Hula Baloo microsoft.public.windows.vista.installation setup 8 02-21-2009 16:06
Increasing System Restore Point Size? Mike123 microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 9 02-16-2008 10:05
System Restore Size? EW microsoft.public.windows.vista.file management 11 10-27-2007 01:24
System Restore Size / Registry Vega microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 4 08-26-2007 21:17
system restore not creating system restore everyday =?Utf-8?B?R1Q=?= microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 3 02-23-2007 01:25




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:58.




Driver Scanner - Free Scan Now

Vistaheads.com is part of the Heads Network. See also XPHeads.com and Win7Heads.com.


Funny Commercials to make you laugh :-)

Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119