Maybe, but it's pretty easy to call someone you disagree with "biased."
You'll have to give a little more meat than that to persuade people the
author isn't spot-on. The examples he gives are really good ones, especially
with respect to UAC.
I had not owned a Mac in more than 10 years. I bought my MacBook because I
needed to test sites on Safari and software under Mac OSX. And because it
could run Windows -- either natively via BootCamp or as a virtual machine
with Parallels. (And it does so, beautifully.) Nevertheless, I'm finding the
call of Mac OSX to be quite seductive. I find it cleaner, faster, less
obtrusive, and better integrated than Vista.
Moving to Vista will require, for many people, additional investment in new
hardware and upgrades/replacement of software and utilities, etc. Given
that, it's quite reasonable to migrate to Mac OSX instead. Maybe I'll be
more keen on Vista when my sound card, fax modem, scanner, database
software, RAD tool, and graphics applications work properly with it. (Mac
OSX already runs them just fine today. Well, okay, not the sound card.)
"Brian W" <brian.NOSPAMwescombe@PLEASEntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:6j8oh.34708$1W1.21944@newsfe4-win.ntli.net...
> There's nothing like a totally unbiased review... And that's nothing like
> a totally unbiased review.
>
> "Bill Marriott" <zuidema@newsgroups.nospam> wrote in message
> news:uTK9RjmMHHA.3872@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> http://www.informationweek.com/news/...leID=196800670
>>
>> As someone who picked up a MacBook in November, I can wholeheartedly
>> agree with the conclusions in this article.
>>
>