Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
|
|
Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects
microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
|
Click On Your Flag for Translation
|

12-01-2008
|
|
|
|
Frank the nut licker wrote
Ill just keep posting here the news about how much better windows7 will be!
And can you keep insisting that it's the same as vista.. lol
LOL frank you want to lose this round too? You already lost the "vista is
the best os" one
"FBonWin7x32" <fb@ruy.bia> wrote in message news:gh1hh4$eb0$2@aioe.org...
> I came from the nut ward wrote:
>> More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just
>> another vista.
>> Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts
>> name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got!
>>
>> UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which
>> lets any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop
>> transparency and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D
>> requirements for video games. Microsoft seems to have learned something
>> from the "Vista Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less confusion
>> on what can "run" the OS due out in mid-2009. [via]
>>
>> http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
> You're an idiot who has escaped from the loony bin!...LOL!
|
|

12-01-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects
spanky moron, you had a same sex marriage?
wait.. I forgot.. you HAVE no sex.. so I guess it's a wife married to a...
a... a...... well.. with a thing!
"I came from a distant bar" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
news:JiYYk.8654$Ei5.4850@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com...
>
> "Bob Campbell" <bob@bob.bob> wrote in message
> news:fuWdnW4ti4mjzanUnZ2dnUVZ_qLinZ2d@supernews.co m...
>> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
>> news:49344182$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>>> UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which
>>> lets any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop
>>> transparency and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D
>>> requirements for video games.
>>
>> What a load of baloney. You can't even *install* Vista on an 800 MHz
>> CPU, but "Windows 7" will run perfect and fast on it, complete with
>> advanced graphics!
>>
>> I'm guessing that the next revelation - by some equally obscure "PC
>> magazine" in Katmandu - will be that when you fart in front of any
>> "Windows 7" machine with a 3.5" floppy drive, a little hand will come out
>> of the floppy drive slot and wave it away.
>
> I should install one of those devices in front of my wife!
>
>
>
|
|

12-02-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects
Maybe you should read the real artcile that your work of fiction is based
on.
http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/60527...n-the-cpu.html
Radically different view.
and to known more go watch the presentation in PC05 give at the Microsoft
PDC a number of weeks ago
see
https://sessions.microsoftpdc.com/public/timeline.aspx
--
Mike Brannigan
"I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
news:49344182$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just
> another vista.
> Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts
> name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got!
>
> UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which lets
> any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop transparency
> and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D requirements for video
> games. Microsoft seems to have learned something from the "Vista
> Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less confusion on what can "run"
> the OS due out in mid-2009. [via]
>
> http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
|
|

12-02-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects
WTF???
YOU IDIOT!!! lol
I give the source towards the location I find this information.. right below
the text on my POST!
http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
If you want to be your crappy self and complain, go complain to lifehacker!
although I must point out, that since you live vista, you are stupid and
they will just reject you as a retard! lol
"Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message
news:817088E9-640A-4FCF-9647-CB2DD875DA44@microsoft.com...
> Maybe you should read the real artcile that your work of fiction is based
> on.
> http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/60527...n-the-cpu.html
> Radically different view.
> and to known more go watch the presentation in PC05 give at the Microsoft
> PDC a number of weeks ago
> see
> https://sessions.microsoftpdc.com/public/timeline.aspx
>
> --
> Mike Brannigan
>
> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
> news:49344182$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just
>> another vista.
>> Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts
>> name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got!
>>
>> UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which
>> lets any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop
>> transparency and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D
>> requirements for video games. Microsoft seems to have learned something
>> from the "Vista Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less confusion
>> on what can "run" the OS due out in mid-2009. [via]
>>
>> http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
>
|
|

12-02-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects
i wonder if you really read the article before you posted...
you idiot...shut up and go back to Uranus
"I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> 在郵件張貼內容主旨
4934816e$1@newsgate.x-privat.org ä¸*撰寫...
> WTF???
>
> YOU IDIOT!!! lol
>
> I give the source towards the location I find this information.. right
> below the text on my POST!
>
> http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
>
> If you want to be your crappy self and complain, go complain to
> lifehacker!
>
> although I must point out, that since you live vista, you are stupid and
> they will just reject you as a retard! lol
>
>
>
>
>
> "Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message
> news:817088E9-640A-4FCF-9647-CB2DD875DA44@microsoft.com...
>> Maybe you should read the real artcile that your work of fiction is based
>> on.
>> http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/60527...n-the-cpu.html
>> Radically different view.
>> and to known more go watch the presentation in PC05 give at the Microsoft
>> PDC a number of weeks ago
>> see
>> https://sessions.microsoftpdc.com/public/timeline.aspx
>>
>> --
>> Mike Brannigan
>>
>> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
>> news:49344182$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>>> More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just
>>> another vista.
>>> Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts
>>> name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got!
>>>
>>> UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which
>>> lets any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop
>>> transparency and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D
>>> requirements for video games. Microsoft seems to have learned something
>>> from the "Vista Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less confusion
>>> on what can "run" the OS due out in mid-2009. [via]
>>>
>>> http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
>>
>
|
|

12-02-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects
Lord Fauntleroy wrote:
> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
> news:49344182$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just
>> another vista.
>> Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts
>> name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got!
>>
>
> You are right. You came from a distant star - Uranus.
>
> Now go back
>
>
Um, Uranus is not a star but a planet. I guess you slept through
astronomy too.
Alias
|
|

12-02-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects
"I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
news:4934816e$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> WTF???
>
> YOU IDIOT!!! lol
>
> I give the source towards the location I find this information.. right
> below the text on my POST!
>
> http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
>
> If you want to be your crappy self and complain, go complain to
> lifehacker!
>
> although I must point out, that since you live vista, you are stupid and
> they will just reject you as a retard! lol
No - the article you post that has given you your initial incorrect
assumptions actually based on another article . If you had actually read the
article you posted you would see the link to the one for "custompc" where
you will read the real story and this would help correct your
misunderstanding. I also posted a link where you can then see the actual
session given by Microsoft at the PDC that the custompc article was based
on.
This will again help correct your misunderstandings.
The trick is to read the articles in more detail and also read any
associated links etc before you go shooting your mouth off and calling
people "idiots"
--
Mike Brannigan
"I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
news:4934816e$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> WTF???
>
> YOU IDIOT!!! lol
>
> I give the source towards the location I find this information.. right
> below the text on my POST!
>
> http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
>
> If you want to be your crappy self and complain, go complain to
> lifehacker!
>
> although I must point out, that since you live vista, you are stupid and
> they will just reject you as a retard! lol
>
>
>
>
>
> "Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message
> news:817088E9-640A-4FCF-9647-CB2DD875DA44@microsoft.com...
>> Maybe you should read the real artcile that your work of fiction is based
>> on.
>> http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/60527...n-the-cpu.html
>> Radically different view.
>> and to known more go watch the presentation in PC05 give at the Microsoft
>> PDC a number of weeks ago
>> see
>> https://sessions.microsoftpdc.com/public/timeline.aspx
>>
>> --
>> Mike Brannigan
>>
>> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
>> news:49344182$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>>> More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just
>>> another vista.
>>> Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts
>>> name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got!
>>>
>>> UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which
>>> lets any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop
>>> transparency and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D
>>> requirements for video games. Microsoft seems to have learned something
>>> from the "Vista Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less confusion
>>> on what can "run" the OS due out in mid-2009. [via]
>>>
>>> http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
>>
|
|

12-02-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects
The article is crap.
--
Computer Novice
"And In The End... The Love You Take, Is Equal To The Love You Make"
"Mike Brannigan" wrote:
> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
> news:4934816e$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> > WTF???
> >
> > YOU IDIOT!!! lol
> >
> > I give the source towards the location I find this information.. right
> > below the text on my POST!
> >
> > http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
> >
> > If you want to be your crappy self and complain, go complain to
> > lifehacker!
> >
> > although I must point out, that since you live vista, you are stupid and
> > they will just reject you as a retard! lol
>
> No - the article you post that has given you your initial incorrect
> assumptions actually based on another article . If you had actually read the
> article you posted you would see the link to the one for "custompc" where
> you will read the real story and this would help correct your
> misunderstanding. I also posted a link where you can then see the actual
> session given by Microsoft at the PDC that the custompc article was based
> on.
> This will again help correct your misunderstandings.
> The trick is to read the articles in more detail and also read any
> associated links etc before you go shooting your mouth off and calling
> people "idiots"
> --
>
> Mike Brannigan
> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
> news:4934816e$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> > WTF???
> >
> > YOU IDIOT!!! lol
> >
> > I give the source towards the location I find this information.. right
> > below the text on my POST!
> >
> > http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
> >
> > If you want to be your crappy self and complain, go complain to
> > lifehacker!
> >
> > although I must point out, that since you live vista, you are stupid and
> > they will just reject you as a retard! lol
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message
> > news:817088E9-640A-4FCF-9647-CB2DD875DA44@microsoft.com...
> >> Maybe you should read the real artcile that your work of fiction is based
> >> on.
> >> http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/60527...n-the-cpu.html
> >> Radically different view.
> >> and to known more go watch the presentation in PC05 give at the Microsoft
> >> PDC a number of weeks ago
> >> see
> >> https://sessions.microsoftpdc.com/public/timeline.aspx
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mike Brannigan
> >>
> >> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
> >> news:49344182$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> >>> More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just
> >>> another vista.
> >>> Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts
> >>> name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got!
> >>>
> >>> UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which
> >>> lets any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop
> >>> transparency and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D
> >>> requirements for video games. Microsoft seems to have learned something
> >>> from the "Vista Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less confusion
> >>> on what can "run" the OS due out in mid-2009. [via]
> >>>
> >>> http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
> >>
>
|
|

12-02-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects
"The C." <GFY.ALIAS&DEET@alias&deetarepesant.com> wrote in message
news:B57AEC27-FB8B-4D06-8B8F-5464FB9E3003@microsoft.com...
> The article is crap.
> --
> Computer Novice
>
>
>
> "And In The End... The Love You Take, Is Equal To The Love You Make"
>
>
Maybe you would like to have posted this to the original poster or at least
said which article you think is "crap" since you are on the thread
discussing the original article its source article the original posters
interpretation of the original article (without looking at the source
article) etc.
This may be due to you using the web interface to read a newsgroup - you
may have a better reading and responding experience if you switch to using a
real news reader such as Outlook Express (Windows XP) or Windows Mail (on
Windows Vista)
see
http://www.microsoft.com/communities.../nntpnews.mspx
--
Mike Brannigan
"The C." <GFY.ALIAS&DEET@alias&deetarepesant.com> wrote in message
news:B57AEC27-FB8B-4D06-8B8F-5464FB9E3003@microsoft.com...
> The article is crap.
> --
> Computer Novice
>
>
>
> "And In The End... The Love You Take, Is Equal To The Love You Make"
>
>
> "Mike Brannigan" wrote:
>
>> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
>> news:4934816e$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> > WTF???
>> >
>> > YOU IDIOT!!! lol
>> >
>> > I give the source towards the location I find this information.. right
>> > below the text on my POST!
>> >
>> > http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
>> >
>> > If you want to be your crappy self and complain, go complain to
>> > lifehacker!
>> >
>> > although I must point out, that since you live vista, you are stupid
>> > and
>> > they will just reject you as a retard! lol
>>
>> No - the article you post that has given you your initial incorrect
>> assumptions actually based on another article . If you had actually read
>> the
>> article you posted you would see the link to the one for "custompc" where
>> you will read the real story and this would help correct your
>> misunderstanding. I also posted a link where you can then see the actual
>> session given by Microsoft at the PDC that the custompc article was based
>> on.
>> This will again help correct your misunderstandings.
>> The trick is to read the articles in more detail and also read any
>> associated links etc before you go shooting your mouth off and calling
>> people "idiots"
>> --
>>
>> Mike Brannigan
>> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
>> news:4934816e$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> > WTF???
>> >
>> > YOU IDIOT!!! lol
>> >
>> > I give the source towards the location I find this information.. right
>> > below the text on my POST!
>> >
>> > http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
>> >
>> > If you want to be your crappy self and complain, go complain to
>> > lifehacker!
>> >
>> > although I must point out, that since you live vista, you are stupid
>> > and
>> > they will just reject you as a retard! lol
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message
>> > news:817088E9-640A-4FCF-9647-CB2DD875DA44@microsoft.com...
>> >> Maybe you should read the real artcile that your work of fiction is
>> >> based
>> >> on.
>> >> http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/60527...n-the-cpu.html
>> >> Radically different view.
>> >> and to known more go watch the presentation in PC05 give at the
>> >> Microsoft
>> >> PDC a number of weeks ago
>> >> see
>> >> https://sessions.microsoftpdc.com/public/timeline.aspx
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Mike Brannigan
>> >>
>> >> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:49344182$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> >>> More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just
>> >>> another vista.
>> >>> Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to
>> >>> Microsofts
>> >>> name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they
>> >>> got!
>> >>>
>> >>> UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which
>> >>> lets any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop
>> >>> transparency and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D
>> >>> requirements for video games. Microsoft seems to have learned
>> >>> something
>> >>> from the "Vista Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less
>> >>> confusion
>> >>> on what can "run" the OS due out in mid-2009. [via]
>> >>>
>> >>> http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
>> >>
>>
|
|

12-02-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects
"Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.ubunturocks> wrote in message
news:gh20hn$cv9$2@aioe.org...
> Lord Fauntleroy wrote:
>> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
>> news:49344182$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>>> More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just
>>> another vista.
>>> Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts
>>> name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got!
>>>
>>
>> You are right. You came from a distant star - Uranus.
>>
>> Now go back
>
> Um, Uranus is not a star but a planet. I guess you slept through astronomy
> too.
>
> Alias
Hey - Uranus is a place you can go to and try to get everyone to switch to
Ubuntu!!!
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:47.
|
|