Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads
Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now



Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Speed Up My Pc 2009!

Concurrent Sessions, Vista, and Logo Requirements.

microsoft.public.windows.vista.general



Click On Your Flag for Translation
Simplified Chinese French Spanish Italian Portugeuse Japanese German Dutch
Reply
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2007
=?Utf-8?B?YWxlZQ==?=
 

Posts: n/a
Concurrent Sessions, Vista, and Logo Requirements.
Everyone has uncategorically denied that Vista will have the functionality if
Concurrent Sessions. I found it very curious that I found the below in a
Microsoft document, specifically, Requirements for the Windows Vista Logo
Program for Software.

Find Section 1.8 below:

1.8 Support Concurrent User Sessions

Criteria
• If an application does not support running in multiple user logon
sessions, it must alert the user of this fact before failing and write a
message to the NT event log. This includes user sessions created using
Remote Desktop Connection.
• Applications must allow multiple sessions unless prevented by architecture
issues. If an application does not support this scenario, the user must be
alerted upon failure. Additionally, applications that rely on 3D graphics
are not required to work over a Remote Desktop Connection, but the user must
be alerted upon failure.
• Applications must correctly check for multiple application sessions. If
multiple application sessions are unsupported, the application must check
both user session and task information. This will avoid the blocking of
application use in concurrent user sessions.
• Sound from an application in one user session must not be heard when
another user is active in the current session.
• Applications must support fast user switching

Rationale
Windows users should be able to run concurrent sessions without conflict or
disruption.


Anyone changing their viewpoint considering the above?

Aaron
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2007
=?Utf-8?B?VG9tIFppZWdtYW5u?=
 

Posts: n/a
RE: Concurrent Sessions, Vista, and Logo Requirements.
I believe the Concurrent sessions is for RDP connections only, and I think
the "multiple application sessions" refers to machines where multiple users
(i.e. family computers) may be logged on all at one time.
--
Tom Ziegmann
Microsoft Certified Professional
Windows Vista / Server Longhorn TechBeta Tester
Windows Server 2003 SP2 TechBeta Tester



"alee" wrote:

> Everyone has uncategorically denied that Vista will have the functionality if
> Concurrent Sessions. I found it very curious that I found the below in a
> Microsoft document, specifically, Requirements for the Windows Vista Logo
> Program for Software.
>
> Find Section 1.8 below:
>
> 1.8 Support Concurrent User Sessions
>
> Criteria
> • If an application does not support running in multiple user logon
> sessions, it must alert the user of this fact before failing and write a
> message to the NT event log. This includes user sessions created using
> Remote Desktop Connection.
> • Applications must allow multiple sessions unless prevented by architecture
> issues. If an application does not support this scenario, the user must be
> alerted upon failure. Additionally, applications that rely on 3D graphics
> are not required to work over a Remote Desktop Connection, but the user must
> be alerted upon failure.
> • Applications must correctly check for multiple application sessions. If
> multiple application sessions are unsupported, the application must check
> both user session and task information. This will avoid the blocking of
> application use in concurrent user sessions.
> • Sound from an application in one user session must not be heard when
> another user is active in the current session.
> • Applications must support fast user switching
>
> Rationale
> Windows users should be able to run concurrent sessions without conflict or
> disruption.
>
>
> Anyone changing their viewpoint considering the above?
>
> Aaron

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2007
Colin Barnhorst
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Concurrent Sessions, Vista, and Logo Requirements.
Does fast user switching figure in here, Tom?

"Tom Ziegmann" <tziegmann@nospam.msn.com> wrote in message
newsC6C8534-9BBD-4521-84A6-744C0AD73797@microsoft.com...
>I believe the Concurrent sessions is for RDP connections only, and I think
> the "multiple application sessions" refers to machines where multiple
> users
> (i.e. family computers) may be logged on all at one time.
> --
> Tom Ziegmann
> Microsoft Certified Professional
> Windows Vista / Server Longhorn TechBeta Tester
> Windows Server 2003 SP2 TechBeta Tester
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2007
Rick Rogers
 

Posts: n/a
Re: Concurrent Sessions, Vista, and Logo Requirements.
Absolutely, Colin. The application must support being stored "in stasis" in
memory for the inactive user(s) as well as the active one. That is what that
documentation is all about. OP is confusing concurrent active user sessions
with concurrent occurences of an application. And actually, with the
application running entirely within the user environment, I understand that
for the program writers this requirement is much easier to implement.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org

"Colin Barnhorst" <colinbarharst@msn.com> wrote in message
news:06EBA72C-D11F-43BF-82C4-BC0E1C9B7E8B@microsoft.com...
> Does fast user switching figure in here, Tom?
>
> "Tom Ziegmann" <tziegmann@nospam.msn.com> wrote in message
> newsC6C8534-9BBD-4521-84A6-744C0AD73797@microsoft.com...
>>I believe the Concurrent sessions is for RDP connections only, and I think
>> the "multiple application sessions" refers to machines where multiple
>> users
>> (i.e. family computers) may be logged on all at one time.
>> --
>> Tom Ziegmann
>> Microsoft Certified Professional
>> Windows Vista / Server Longhorn TechBeta Tester
>> Windows Server 2003 SP2 TechBeta Tester
>>

>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Concurrent Sessions? =?Utf-8?B?RGF2aWQgV3JpZ2h0?= microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 8 02-28-2007 20:31
Basic Consumer Logo Test =?Utf-8?B?WGl5YW5nZmFuZ3pp?= microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 0 02-28-2007 20:01
Requirements for a Classic Clean Install of Vista. Colin Barnhorst microsoft.public.windows.vista.general 4 02-28-2007 20:00


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:32.


Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now

Driver Scanner 2 - Free Scan Now



Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119