Windows Vista is slowing the Navy down ??

On Fri, 16 May 2008 16:47:58 -0500, Ivan Marsh wrote:

> On Fri, 16 May 2008 14:06:43 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Ivan Marsh <ivanmarsh@yahoo.com>
>> wrote
>> on Fri, 16 May 2008 13:53:47 -0500
>> <pan.2008.05.16.18.53.46.486748@yahoo.com>:
>>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 14:44:09 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 13:37:30 -0500, Ivan Marsh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> *This should in no way be misconstrued as an endorsement of windows.
>>>>> I would not knowingly trust my life to a Microsoft OS.*
>>>>
>>>> Ever been in a hospital?
>>>> If so ,you already have.
>>>>
>>>> Ever go to the doctor?
>>>> If so, you already have.
>>>>
>>>> Ever go to the dentist?
>>>> If so you already have.
>>>>
>>>> Ever go to the pharmacy to get medications? If so you already have.
>>>>
>>>> ....and so forth..
>>>
>>> I said I didn't WANT to know.
>>>
>>>
>> Well, FWIW my dentist also uses Windows to keep track of appointments.
>> AFAIK the drilling equipment and such is not computer-controlled. I
>> wouldn't worry unnecessarily.
>>
>> Bear also in mind that Java's EULA has the following clause:
>>
>> 3. RESTRICTIONS. [...] You acknowledge that Licensed Software is not
>> designed or intended for use in the design, construction, operation or
>> maintenance of any nuclear facility. Sun Microsystems, Inc. disclaims
>> any express or implied warranty of fitness for such uses. [...]
>>
>> (Personally, I'm not sure *any* language is explicitly intended for use
>> in the design of nuclear facilities -- or anything else, really. It's a
>> strange inclusion, though.)
>
> It's not that strange.
>
> Microsoft's license indemnifies them from any catastrophic failure of
> their software.
>
> It's sad that part of any software license pretty much says "Do not use
> this software to do anything important."
>
> At least Java went to Mars.

Was Java running the innards of that 40 million dollar Tonka Toy that went
brain dead on Mars 10 minutes after it landed?


--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

On Fri, 16 May 2008 17:57:01 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:

> On Fri, 16 May 2008 16:47:58 -0500, Ivan Marsh wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 14:06:43 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>>
>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Ivan Marsh <ivanmarsh@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote
>>> on Fri, 16 May 2008 13:53:47 -0500
>>> <pan.2008.05.16.18.53.46.486748@yahoo.com>:
>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 14:44:09 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 13:37:30 -0500, Ivan Marsh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> *This should in no way be misconstrued as an endorsement of
>>>>>> windows. I would not knowingly trust my life to a Microsoft OS.*
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever been in a hospital?
>>>>> If so ,you already have.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever go to the doctor?
>>>>> If so, you already have.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever go to the dentist?
>>>>> If so you already have.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever go to the pharmacy to get medications? If so you already have.
>>>>>
>>>>> ....and so forth..
>>>>
>>>> I said I didn't WANT to know.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Well, FWIW my dentist also uses Windows to keep track of appointments.
>>> AFAIK the drilling equipment and such is not computer-controlled. I
>>> wouldn't worry unnecessarily.
>>>
>>> Bear also in mind that Java's EULA has the following clause:
>>>
>>> 3. RESTRICTIONS. [...] You acknowledge that Licensed Software is not
>>> designed or intended for use in the design, construction, operation or
>>> maintenance of any nuclear facility. Sun Microsystems, Inc. disclaims
>>> any express or implied warranty of fitness for such uses. [...]
>>>
>>> (Personally, I'm not sure *any* language is explicitly intended for
>>> use in the design of nuclear facilities -- or anything else, really.
>>> It's a strange inclusion, though.)
>>
>> It's not that strange.
>>
>> Microsoft's license indemnifies them from any catastrophic failure of
>> their software.
>>
>> It's sad that part of any software license pretty much says "Do not use
>> this software to do anything important."
>>
>> At least Java went to Mars.
>
> Was Java running the innards of that 40 million dollar Tonka Toy that
> went brain dead on Mars 10 minutes after it landed?

Suggesting that hitting Mars much less landing safely on the surface is
trivial?

I don't know which systems Java was used in exactly... I just know it was
along for the ride.

--
"Remain calm, we're here to protect you!"

On Fri, 16 May 2008 17:00:21 -0500, Ivan Marsh wrote:

> On Fri, 16 May 2008 17:57:01 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 16:47:58 -0500, Ivan Marsh wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 14:06:43 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>>>
>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Ivan Marsh <ivanmarsh@yahoo.com>
>>>> wrote
>>>> on Fri, 16 May 2008 13:53:47 -0500
>>>> <pan.2008.05.16.18.53.46.486748@yahoo.com>:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 14:44:09 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 13:37:30 -0500, Ivan Marsh wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *This should in no way be misconstrued as an endorsement of
>>>>>>> windows. I would not knowingly trust my life to a Microsoft OS.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ever been in a hospital?
>>>>>> If so ,you already have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ever go to the doctor?
>>>>>> If so, you already have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ever go to the dentist?
>>>>>> If so you already have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ever go to the pharmacy to get medications? If so you already have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ....and so forth..
>>>>>
>>>>> I said I didn't WANT to know.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Well, FWIW my dentist also uses Windows to keep track of appointments.
>>>> AFAIK the drilling equipment and such is not computer-controlled. I
>>>> wouldn't worry unnecessarily.
>>>>
>>>> Bear also in mind that Java's EULA has the following clause:
>>>>
>>>> 3. RESTRICTIONS. [...] You acknowledge that Licensed Software is not
>>>> designed or intended for use in the design, construction, operation or
>>>> maintenance of any nuclear facility. Sun Microsystems, Inc. disclaims
>>>> any express or implied warranty of fitness for such uses. [...]
>>>>
>>>> (Personally, I'm not sure *any* language is explicitly intended for
>>>> use in the design of nuclear facilities -- or anything else, really.
>>>> It's a strange inclusion, though.)
>>>
>>> It's not that strange.
>>>
>>> Microsoft's license indemnifies them from any catastrophic failure of
>>> their software.
>>>
>>> It's sad that part of any software license pretty much says "Do not use
>>> this software to do anything important."
>>>
>>> At least Java went to Mars.
>>
>> Was Java running the innards of that 40 million dollar Tonka Toy that
>> went brain dead on Mars 10 minutes after it landed?
>
> Suggesting that hitting Mars much less landing safely on the surface is
> trivial?

Not at all.

The thing fscked up.

I'm just wondering if Java was what fscked it up.

> I don't know which systems Java was used in exactly... I just know it was
> along for the ride.


--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

In article <3k91g5-cqr.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net>,
The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote:
>
>(Personally, I'm not sure *any* language is explicitly
>intended for use in the design of nuclear facilities --

ADA?

"the wharf rat" <wrat@panix.com> wrote in message
news:g0l1rm$b44$1@reader2.panix.com...
> In article <3k91g5-cqr.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net>,
> The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote:
>>
>>(Personally, I'm not sure *any* language is explicitly
>>intended for use in the design of nuclear facilities --
>
> ADA?
>

CHILL, been a while since I used that, in fact I can't remember the syntax
at all.

"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message
news:1ad715c9-92b6-481a-8824-c49183714982@w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> "dennis@home" <den...@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:
>>
>> ... no mention of vista gives you several
>> choices including: linux, Mac, XP, 98, 95, CE,
>> pSOS, DOS, and loads of others. Choose the best
>> one for the application and everything will be fine.
>
> IIRC, the USN had been using NT on some of their ships a couple of
> years ago.
>
> Here's some links:
>
> <http://www.gcn.com/print/17_17/33727-1.html>
>
> <http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/1998/07/13987>
>
> <http://windowsitpro.com/article/arti...nt-sinks-navy-
> ship.html>
>
> These are all pretty dated; not sure if there's more current info
> online or not.

I remember reading that at the time it happened. I would have thought the
navy would have used something much more stable for critical operations.
Also more secure, like OpenBSD or something. Also cluster them for fail
over. Using NT was stupid, could have been real bad if they failed in an
active combat war zone at sea.

Canuck57 wrote:

> I remember reading that at the time it happened. I would have thought the
> navy would have used something much more stable for critical operations.
> Also more secure, like OpenBSD or something. Also cluster them for fail
> over. Using NT was stupid, could have been real bad if they failed in an
> active combat war zone at sea.

NT Fail? What exactly do you know about Windows NT and its
stability/reliability?

Steve

Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@gmail.com> writes:

>On Fri, 16 May 2008 16:47:58 -0500, Ivan Marsh wrote:

>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 14:06:43 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>>
>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Ivan Marsh <ivanmarsh@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote
>>> on Fri, 16 May 2008 13:53:47 -0500
>>> <pan.2008.05.16.18.53.46.486748@yahoo.com>:
>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 14:44:09 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 13:37:30 -0500, Ivan Marsh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> *This should in no way be misconstrued as an endorsement of windows.
>>>>>> I would not knowingly trust my life to a Microsoft OS.*
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever been in a hospital?
>>>>> If so ,you already have.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever go to the doctor?
>>>>> If so, you already have.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever go to the dentist?
>>>>> If so you already have.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever go to the pharmacy to get medications? If so you already have.
>>>>>
>>>>> ....and so forth..
>>>>
>>>> I said I didn't WANT to know.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Well, FWIW my dentist also uses Windows to keep track of appointments.
>>> AFAIK the drilling equipment and such is not computer-controlled. I
>>> wouldn't worry unnecessarily.
>>>
>>> Bear also in mind that Java's EULA has the following clause:
>>>
>>> 3. RESTRICTIONS. [...] You acknowledge that Licensed Software is not
>>> designed or intended for use in the design, construction, operation or
>>> maintenance of any nuclear facility. Sun Microsystems, Inc. disclaims
>>> any express or implied warranty of fitness for such uses. [...]
>>>
>>> (Personally, I'm not sure *any* language is explicitly intended for use
>>> in the design of nuclear facilities -- or anything else, really. It's a
>>> strange inclusion, though.)
>>
>> It's not that strange.
>>
>> Microsoft's license indemnifies them from any catastrophic failure of
>> their software.

They can say anything they want in their license. the question is whetehr
the courts will accept it.
Eg, a ski lift operator here even had a sign disclaiming responsibil8ity if
anything went wrong with the lifts. They were successfully sued then their
lift broken and injured a bunch of people.


>>
>> It's sad that part of any software license pretty much says "Do not use
>> this software to do anything important."
>>
>> At least Java went to Mars.

>Was Java running the innards of that 40 million dollar Tonka Toy that went
>brain dead on Mars 10 minutes after it landed?


>--
>Moshe Goldfarb
>Collector of soaps from around the globe.
>Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
>http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

On Fri, 16 May 2008 23:29:47 GMT, Unruh wrote:


> They can say anything they want in their license. the question is whetehr
> the courts will accept it.
> Eg, a ski lift operator here even had a sign disclaiming responsibil8ity if
> anything went wrong with the lifts. They were successfully sued then their
> lift broken and injured a bunch of people.

Correct.
That's the old roller/ice skate rink analogy.
Every one of these places has a sign that they are not resposnible for
injuries.
True if some idiot who has never skated before tries a "Hammil Camel" and
breaks his neck due to completely to his own stupidity.

Maybe not so true if it can be proven that the ice was defective, dirty or
the rental skates were poor quality or that the owner didn't police the
riff raff and someone tossed a soda can under the poor bloke's skates in
the middle of his performance.

It all depends......




--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Steve de Mena wrote:
> Canuck57 wrote:
>
>> I remember reading that at the time it happened. I would have thought
>> the navy would have used something much more stable for critical
>> operations. Also more secure, like OpenBSD or something. Also cluster
>> them for fail over. Using NT was stupid, could have been real bad if
>> they failed in an active combat war zone at sea.
>
>
> NT Fail? What exactly do you know about Windows NT and its
> stability/reliability?
>
> Steve

Pay no attention to him. He's just an MS hating lying linux troll.
Frank