|
Re: Pretty Cool
I agree whole-heartedly. It's a new operating system. Get new, and
appropriate, hardware.
I suggest, though, a minimum of one giga-byte of RAM in all cases and
preferably two giga-bytes. If potential Vista users can't afford, or won't
buy, the appropriate hardware, they can't blame the OS for not performing
like they wish.
The original published requirements for XP included 64MB of RAM. I worked
for a company a few years back that decided, with no testing or forethought,
to upgrade all 500 desktops to XP because they all met the requirements of
64MB of RAM. It virtually shut the company's PCs down for three days until
they purchased RAM to upgrade to a whopping 96MB.
Pre-SP2, XP would run fairly well with 256MB of RAM. After putting SP2 on
my wife's PC, XP performed so poorly with 256 MB I had to throw it out
because it wasn't worth the money to upgrade the RAM.
So, my point is, again: you gotta pay to play. If you don't have the right
hardware, don't blame the OS for not performing.
Dale
"Bill" <bill@c.a> wrote in message
news:2tqdnafgG4e3eR_YnZ2dnUVZ_t6qnZ2d@golden.net.. .
> "Roy Coorne" <rcoorne@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OksYGz6HHHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Bill wrote:
>> ...
>>> For typical home users Flip-3D is not a big deal since many of them
>>> don't even leave a few windows open, they close a window instead of
>>> minimizing or simply opening another over it as if they think leaving
>>> windows open is somehow bad. Maybe they think that's how bugs get
>>> in...hehe.
>>
>> We suppose that opening windows consumes RAM.
>
>
> So? Buy some more memory, it's cheap.
>
> If you're running Vista, you probably have 1gig or more of memory. With
> 1gig on my old P4 I can open at least two dozen typical application
> windows without any problems and no appreciable performance hit. With more
> memory one can open many more programs.
>
> If people with older computers have XP with 512megs of memory and they
> want to install Vista, my first recommendation is to upgrade to at least
> 768megs to maintain performance, and preferably 1gig. Vista isn't going to
> be cheap, so what's another $50 to double your RAM?
>
> With 64-bit editions, I suggest at least 1gig for very basic usage, and
> 1.5gig or more is highly recommended for typical use. In testing, I found
> that x64 starts to work at the 1gig point, but opens up nicely at 1.5gig.
> If you want to run lots of apps or open large documents, then 2+gigs is
> the only way to go.
>
> --
> Happy Holidays!
>
|