Re: Internet Speed

dennis@home wrote:

>
> "PeterKöhlmann" <peter.koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message

< snip >

>>> Rubbish, not one of you could provide any evidence that the *known*
>>> security hole couldn't be exploited. Then there are the unknown ones. So
>>> if you think your witerings were proof you need educating.
>>>
>>
>> Oh, so you still don't know the difference between "collision attacks"
>> and "pre-image attacks".
>>
>> Nice to know that you are completely unable to understand even very
>> simple concepts, even if they have been explained to you by several
>> diferent people in a lot of posts
>
> I know the difference and you have still shown zero evidence that the
> known flaw does not compromise md5.
> In fact you can't even tell me what the known flaw is.

You incredibly stupid cretin, *that* has also been explained to you dozens
of times

The flaw is that MD5 is (theoretically) susceptible to *collision* *attacks*

What you need for your FUD to work is a "pre-image attack"

> So I think I am perfectly correct in ignoring anything you say on the
> subject.
> If you do have some evidence then post it.
>

It has been posted *dozens* of times
Your only reaction was "la la la"

>>
>> For the unaware in this group:
>
> The unaware in this group can use google if they want the truth, listening
> to your cr@p is not the way to get it.

The explanation you snipped is (in short from) what is really the case with
MD5 (and SHA1)
You may chose to ignore it.
But that just depicts you as the ignorant fool you are

Oh, and BTW: Everyone who wants to take a look how "dennis" has made an
utter fool of himself, google for the thread "Open Source Developers Shun
Micoshaft Corporation" (from COLA)

You will also find all the links given to "dennis" (which he ignored, as he
is too stupid to understand them anyways)

But then, "dennis" is a Vista user. Pond scum is smarter
--
Microsoft: The company that made email dangerous
And web browsing. And viewing pictures. And...

"PeterKöhlmann" <peter.koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message
news:fhuslk$q7f$03$1@news.t-online.com...
> dennis@home wrote:
>
>>
>> "PeterKöhlmann" <peter.koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message
>
> < snip >
>
>>>> Rubbish, not one of you could provide any evidence that the *known*
>>>> security hole couldn't be exploited. Then there are the unknown ones.
>>>> So
>>>> if you think your witerings were proof you need educating.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, so you still don't know the difference between "collision attacks"
>>> and "pre-image attacks".
>>>
>>> Nice to know that you are completely unable to understand even very
>>> simple concepts, even if they have been explained to you by several
>>> diferent people in a lot of posts
>>
>> I know the difference and you have still shown zero evidence that the
>> known flaw does not compromise md5.
>> In fact you can't even tell me what the known flaw is.
>
> You incredibly stupid cretin, *that* has also been explained to you dozens
> of times
>
> The flaw is that MD5 is (theoretically) susceptible to *collision*
> *attacks*
>
> What you need for your FUD to work is a "pre-image attack"

No it doesn't.
You just show that you do not understand.
I am not going through this again with an idiot like you.
Prove you have even a basic understanding by posting what the known flaw is
and why it doesn't compromise md5.

>
>> So I think I am perfectly correct in ignoring anything you say on the
>> subject.
>> If you do have some evidence then post it.
>>
>
> It has been posted *dozens* of times
> Your only reaction was "la la la"
>
>>>
>>> For the unaware in this group:
>>
>> The unaware in this group can use google if they want the truth,
>> listening
>> to your cr@p is not the way to get it.
>
> The explanation you snipped is (in short from) what is really the case
> with
> MD5 (and SHA1)
> You may chose to ignore it.
> But that just depicts you as the ignorant fool you are
>
> Oh, and BTW: Everyone who wants to take a look how "dennis" has made an
> utter fool of himself, google for the thread "Open Source Developers Shun
> Micoshaft Corporation" (from COLA)
>
> You will also find all the links given to "dennis" (which he ignored, as
> he
> is too stupid to understand them anyways)
>
> But then, "dennis" is a Vista user. Pond scum is smarter

I see you still have to resort to insults as you have no idea how md5 works
or what the flaw is or if it is a problem.
You may as well go back in the killfile as you are still an idiot.