On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:49:00 -0700, Julian
>Another issue related to (3) is that Tags can only be applied to some image
>types incl JPG but not GIF, not PNG...
>This means I can't do what I want even with a Saved Search using tags...
I read a blog article from the feature team concerned, and the
thinking has been to shift from separate tagging systems to tagging
within the internal fields where supported by the file type.
There are pros and cons to this, but one of the cons is that file
types that don't offer suitable fields, won't be tagged.
AFAIK, XP used to do this using ADS attached to the files being
tagged. That's NTFS-only, so tags would be lost when carrying files
around on FAT-formatted USB sticks, etc.
There are also concerns about ADS that make me very happy if they
remain unused. The shell doesn't UI them to the user, there are no
limitations on content within these, and code running within these can
masquerade as the file to which they are attached, when it comes to
firewall egress control and other integrety checkers.
>---------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
On the 'net, *everyone* can hear you scream
>---------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -