
03-16-2009
|
|
|
|
Re: NET Framework - general question
Bruce, thanks. Dave Horne
"Bruce Hagen" <Nospam@mymail.invalid> wrote in message
news:eHZavMkpJHA.3896@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> .NET Framework 1.1, 2.0 and 3.5 are all independent versions and not
> cumulative. Different programs use different versions of .NET framework.
> If you have a program that needs 2.0, then you will need to download it.
> Look for updates after you do.
> --
>
> Bruce Hagen
> MS-MVP Outlook Express
> Imperial Beach, CA
>
>
> "Dave Horne" <davehorne@home.nl> wrote in message
> news:eVoLEDipJHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>I trust this is the correct forum for this question. I have NET Framework
>>3.5 on my Vista Home Premium (SP1) computer. Very recently my 'Dell
>>Support Center' system tray icon informed me I needed NET Framework 2.
>>This was a pop up 'alert' from that Dell utility.
>>
>> My question - is my NET Framework 3.5 a cumlative update and already
>> 'contains' version 2 ... or not?
>>
>> It just seemed strange that all of a sudden I would need an older version
>> of NET Framework. As far as I can tell everything is working just fine
>> without NET Framework 2.
>>
>> Thanks, Dave Horne
>
|