
11-14-2008
|
|
|
|
Re: Memory Leak in IE WebBrowser Control
Thank you, I will try asking it there!
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote:
> I, in turn, am going to point you to...
>
> MSDN IE Development Forums
> http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/def...D=253&SiteID=1
> --
> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
>
> Cyber_86 wrote:
> > I had asked this question in the C# Development forum, but one of the
> > moderators informed me that I needed to ask it in this forum...
> >
> > This appears to be a common problem, but so far I have not found any
> > answers
> > to it.
> >
> > I am building a C# application with an IE WebBrowser control in it.
> > Whenever I navigate within a page I've loaded in the control, large
> > amounts
> > of memory are being used and not released. After 7 hours of use, my app
> > was
> > showing a memory use of 900MB, which is simply unacceptable for my
> > clients.
> >
> > My question (for myself and all the others who have asked it) is: how can
> > we
> > release the memory being used by the WebBrowser control without completely
> > shutting down the application? I have tried removing the WebBrowser
> > control
> > from it's parent form and calling the dispose() Method on it, but the
> > memory
> > is not released. I have confirmed the memory leak with Taskmgr.exe,
> > Perfmon.exe, and Process Explorer, all of which show this abnormally high
> > memory usage.
> >
> > I understand that the memory usage might come in part from circular
> > references in the underlying DOM object, but I need a way to manually free
> > this memory from time to time.
> >
> > If this is in no way possible, then what alternatives do developers have
> > (seeing as this memory usage is not acceptable to many of us)?
> >
> > I would really appreciate it, and think it would be great if we can
> > finally
> > resolve this issue! Thank you so much for your assistance!
> >
> > Again, I apologize if this is the wrong discussion group, but I was
> > informed
> > that this was the place to post this!
>
>
|