Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads
Recommended Download

Welcome to the Microsoft Windows Vista Community Forums - Vistaheads, YOUR Largest Resource for Windows Vista related information.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so , join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Driver Scanner

M I-5'Per secution ' w hy the s ecurity services ?

Speedup My PC
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2008

Posts: n/a
M I-5'Per secution ' w hy the s ecurity services ?
-= why the security services?. -=

You may ask,. why do I think the "they" referred to are the security
services? Is there any evidence. that there is a single source, as opposed
to a loosely based "whispering campaign" amongst. many people? Even if there
is a single source, is there any evidence that "they" are. professional
"buggers" as opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people. working for a privately
funded. organization?

a) As to the question of. a single source versus something more fragmented;
it is quite obvious that. there is a single source from the way the campaign
has been. carried out. Since things have been repeated verbatim which were
said in my home, there. must be one group which does the watching and
listening. Since on several occasions (mainly during. travel) people have
been planted in close proximity and rehearsed in. what they were to say, it
follows that someone must have done the planning for that, and again. a
single. source is indicated.

b) So why couldn't it be. amateurs? Why couldn't it be a private
organisation, for example a private. detective agency paid to manage the
campaign and undertake the technical aspects? Some detective. agencies are
unscrupulous as has been proved on the occasions in. the past when they've
been exposed. or caught; they too can have access to the bugging technology
deployed; and there are reported cases of. MI5 paying private eyes to do
their dirty work (against. peace campaigners and similar enemies of the
state) on the understanding that if they were caught. then they could deny
all knowledge.. Why couldn't that be the case?

The main factor pointing to. direct security service involvement (as opposed
to amateurs or MI5 proxies) is the breadth of their access to the media. in
particular, and the fact that the television companies. are so involved in
the campaign. The BBC would not. directly invade someone's home themselves,
since it would not be within their. remit to allocate personnel or financial
resources to do so. An. organisation of their stature would not take part in
a. campaign set up by private sources. The only people they would take
material from would be the security services, presumably on the. assumption
that if the cat ever flew out of the bag yowling it would be MI5. who would
take the. consequences.

State sponsorship for these acts of psychological terrorism is. also
indicated. by duration; support for over six years for a team of three or
four people would be beyond the means and will of most. private sources.
The viciousness of the slanders and personal denigration. also points to
MI5; they traditionally. "protect" the British state from politicians of the
wrong hue by character assassination, and in this case are. using their
tried and tested methods to murder with words an enemy they. have invented
for. themselves.

And there are precedents. Diana. and Hewitt were alleged to have been filmed
"at it" by an Army intelligence. team which had operated in Northern
Ireland, these allegations were made by someone. called Jones who had been
on the team. His statements were denied. by the defence establishment who
tried to character-assassinate. by describing him as the "Jones twins".
Funny how if you tell the truth, then you must be ill,. isn't it? Thought
only communists behaved. like that?

Hewitt later said that he'd been spoken to by. someone in the army who
revealed the existence of videotapes of him and Diana,. and that the tapes
would be published if any attempt. was made by them to resume their


Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M I-5'Per secution ' w hy the s ecurity services ? 0 01-02-2008 11:30
M I-5'Per secution ' w hy the s ecurity services ? 0 01-02-2008 11:30
M I.5 Persecuti on MI5 are Afrai d to Admit Theyr e Be hind th e Per secution management 0 12-31-2007 09:58
M I.5 Persecuti on MI5 are Afrai d to Admit Theyr e Be hind th e Per secution hardware devices 0 12-31-2007 09:58
M I.5 Persecuti on MI5 are Afrai d to Admit Theyr e Be hind th e Per secution maintenance 0 12-31-2007 09:58

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:20.

Driver Scanner - Free Scan Now is part of the Heads Network. See also , and

Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120