"NoStop" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:fr66vf018i0@news5.newsguy.com...
> dennis@home wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "bamboozle" <bamb@oozle.com> wrote in message
>> news:47d65707$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>>> hello, you are believing in a myth postulated by microsoft when they
>>> made
>>> NT, but was fast to backpedal it very fast because the whole world was
>>> laughing...
>>>
>>> NTFS needs defrag... you can do some serious reasearch although the web
>>> is contaminated by misinformation still floating around from back
>>> then...
>>
>> You are just spreading FUD.
>> Name one occasion where NTFS has had to be defragged.
>
> Duh! So MickeyMouse has introduced silent background defragging in Vista
> of
> NTFS volumes for no reason at all, other than to create wear and tear on
> your hard drive? Either Microsoft is just doing it to fuk the end-user or
> it believes that defragging is NECESSARY with the NTFS filesystem. Which
> is
> it oh smart one?

Ask Bill, while you are at it ask him why it isn't enabled by default if its
essential as you don't appear to be able to think for yourself.