http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/05...bye_continues/
(sorry, thought I could not post urls)
Quote from article:
"Microsoft's inability to fix a defect in such a basic feature has led to
its share of conspiracy theories that would be quickly dismissed as kooky,
were it not for the company's steadfast refusal to provide any details about
what's causing the problem. The top contender: The inability to copy files
without stalling isn't a bug at all, but rather the result of a digital
rights management feature designed to protect Hollywood (even if the rest of
us have to cuss our way through four hours deleting a few gigs worth of
crap)."
"Hope" wrote:

> Paul, take a look at this article from your own countrymen before you say
> disparagingly that what I say "doesn't even make sense":
> wwwdottheregisterdotcodotuk/2007/05/15/vistas_long_goodbye_continues/
>
> "Paul Smith" wrote:
>
> > "Hope" <Hope@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:A490956F-7DFC-4705-BA0D-16B373956AEB@microsoft.com...
> > > Will there EVER be a fix for this in Vista??? There have been complaints
> > > since the betas about this.
> >
> > Disk performance is noticeably improved in SP1.
> >
> > > The scuttlebutt on the internet is that each individual file is being
> > > checked for DRM; is this true??
> >
> > Checked for DRM? That doesn't even make sense.
> >
> > > If so, why is Microsoft POLICEMAN of the
> > > world?? The people interested in DRMing their wares should police this
> > > themselves, no? Am I wrong here?
> >
> > Irrelevant as built on a false premise.
> >
> > > and the irritating UAC which I got rid of within a week.
> >
> > I hope for you sake you didn't. That's the one feature people like me have
> > been demanding since the move to NT.
> >
> > --
> > Paul Smith,
> > Yeovil, UK.
> > Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User.
> > http://www.dasmirnov.net/blog/
> > http://www.windowsresource.net/
> >
> > *Remove nospam. to reply by e-mail*
> >
> >