Vista liars in here claim that vista outperforms XP....

they are delusional sick people who know nothing about computers.
I would gladly slap them on the face with a glove that says XP on it.

The HYPE and lies given on this newsgroup was that the RC's contained
debugging code and THAT was the reason they were slow like cows...

But guess what? Exactly as I predicted, the FINAL has very little difference
that RC2.
Its still slow as a cow, and I don't mean a live cow but a cow in a can.

You can clearly see the lies some people say in this newsgroup,
anything to support their perverted and distorted view of the
worst OS Microsoft has ever made.. YES that includes WinME.

Advice? Don't install Vista unless you absolutely have to.
Advice 2? Don't listen to this uneducated vista supporters,
they will keep on saying what they want even if hard proof is shoved on
their ugly faces.



"Alexander Brown" <alexander.brown@windowsmail.com> wrote in message
news:F9CDF290-E893-4B15-B5EE-C485D225EE76@microsoft.com...
> Hear from somewhere, the release version Vista performance improved. At
> least the performance is better than RC1 and RC2. Is it really? I am using
> RC1 in my IBM T42 notebook with 786MB RAM, but performing poor
> performance.
>