To add just a little to the confusion...
All of the anti virus products mentioned have some value.

The worst can perform better than what may otherwise be considered the
best.
What can make the difference?
Which is the user willing to learn how to properly use?

Personally I hate McAfee and Norton anti virus since they are such
resource hogs.
But if someone is familiar with one of them and unwilling to learn
about any other, Norton or McAfee may very well be best for them since
that is what they are willing to use.

My suggestion:
AVG
or
NOD 32

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"Doofy" <rooigrond@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eO%23Kk4N5HHA.980@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> What is the best Anti-Virus software For Vista Ultimate?