No, in other words there is a concept called "due diligence" at work here. It
is impossible make any system perfectly secure. But there's a hell of a
difference between being able to do a casual inspection and retrieve previous
versions through a folder's properties dialog on a machine inadvertantly left
unattended for a few minutes and having to use forensics to get the same
data. The difference is recognized quite widely in court. And these guys are
-- well, lawyers.

"DevilsPGD" wrote:

> In message <4E7B4334-AEEF-44CB-9499-19A594DC0FAE@microsoft.com> jimmuh
> <jimmuh@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >Not
> >that the way XP handles deletions would prevent someone with data recovery
> >software from retrieving old files, but there is a considerable difference in
> >exposure.
>
> In other words, a false sense of security is better then no sense of
> security at all?
> --
> Insert something clever here.
>