Yes McAfee was originally installed on this computer when it was delivered



"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23EP2Gfn9JHA.1376@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> [Crosspost to IE General]
>
>> ...The only difference I see is that the faulty
>> PC is running AVG and the machine that works is running Symantec.
>
> Has a Norton or McAfee application ever been installed on this machine
> (e.g., a free-trial version that came preinstalled when you bought it)?
>
> Make certain that time, date, and time *zone* settings are all correct.
>
> Web Site Reports That You Must Enable Cookies
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/299331
>
> Managing Cookies
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/283185
> http://mvps.org/winhelp2002/cookies.htm
> http://inetexplorer.mvps.org/archive...rs.htm#cookies
> --
> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Client - since 2002
>
>
> Tom wrote:
>> I posted the following on another news group but did not get any
>> response. I
>> am hoping someone knows a littel bit about cookies and Vista.
>>
>> I have a laptop running Vista Business SP1 and IE 7.0. My customer
>> supplied
>> me with a HTTPS test site where the certificate is not really valid so
>> that
>> I can test my BHO. I try to login into his site and I immediately get an
>> error message on their web page saying cookies are not enabled.
>>
>> I set the browser wide open to accept any cookie from anybody. It appears
>> that other sites are writing cookies without any problems.
>>
>> I have tested this on another Vista Ultimate machine and I was able to
>> log
>> into the site without any issues. In addition I tested this on other XP
>> machines with IE 7 & IE 8 without any issues.
>>
>> The funny thing is that each browser (faulty and non faulty) have the
>> exact
>> same internet option settings. The only difference I see is that the
>> faulty
>> PC is running AVG and the machine that works is running Symantec.
>>
>> Does anybody have any idea of what is going on? Or is there a setpoint
>> somewhere that I am not familiar with.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom -
>