"The C." <GFY.ALIAS&DEET@alias&deetarepesant.com> wrote in message
news:B57AEC27-FB8B-4D06-8B8F-5464FB9E3003@microsoft.com...
> The article is crap.
> --
> Computer Novice
>
>
>
> "And In The End... The Love You Take, Is Equal To The Love You Make"
>
>


Maybe you would like to have posted this to the original poster or at least
said which article you think is "crap" since you are on the thread
discussing the original article its source article the original posters
interpretation of the original article (without looking at the source
article) etc.
This may be due to you using the web interface to read a newsgroup - you
may have a better reading and responding experience if you switch to using a
real news reader such as Outlook Express (Windows XP) or Windows Mail (on
Windows Vista)
see
http://www.microsoft.com/communities.../nntpnews.mspx
--
Mike Brannigan

"The C." <GFY.ALIAS&DEET@alias&deetarepesant.com> wrote in message
news:B57AEC27-FB8B-4D06-8B8F-5464FB9E3003@microsoft.com...
> The article is crap.
> --
> Computer Novice
>
>
>
> "And In The End... The Love You Take, Is Equal To The Love You Make"
>
>
> "Mike Brannigan" wrote:
>
>> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
>> news:4934816e$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> > WTF???
>> >
>> > YOU IDIOT!!! lol
>> >
>> > I give the source towards the location I find this information.. right
>> > below the text on my POST!
>> >
>> > http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
>> >
>> > If you want to be your crappy self and complain, go complain to
>> > lifehacker!
>> >
>> > although I must point out, that since you live vista, you are stupid
>> > and
>> > they will just reject you as a retard! lol
>>
>> No - the article you post that has given you your initial incorrect
>> assumptions actually based on another article . If you had actually read
>> the
>> article you posted you would see the link to the one for "custompc" where
>> you will read the real story and this would help correct your
>> misunderstanding. I also posted a link where you can then see the actual
>> session given by Microsoft at the PDC that the custompc article was based
>> on.
>> This will again help correct your misunderstandings.
>> The trick is to read the articles in more detail and also read any
>> associated links etc before you go shooting your mouth off and calling
>> people "idiots"
>> --
>>
>> Mike Brannigan
>> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
>> news:4934816e$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> > WTF???
>> >
>> > YOU IDIOT!!! lol
>> >
>> > I give the source towards the location I find this information.. right
>> > below the text on my POST!
>> >
>> > http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
>> >
>> > If you want to be your crappy self and complain, go complain to
>> > lifehacker!
>> >
>> > although I must point out, that since you live vista, you are stupid
>> > and
>> > they will just reject you as a retard! lol
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message
>> > news:817088E9-640A-4FCF-9647-CB2DD875DA44@microsoft.com...
>> >> Maybe you should read the real artcile that your work of fiction is
>> >> based
>> >> on.
>> >> http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/60527...n-the-cpu.html
>> >> Radically different view.
>> >> and to known more go watch the presentation in PC05 give at the
>> >> Microsoft
>> >> PDC a number of weeks ago
>> >> see
>> >> https://sessions.microsoftpdc.com/public/timeline.aspx
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Mike Brannigan
>> >>
>> >> "I came from distant star" <starail@it.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:49344182$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> >>> More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just
>> >>> another vista.
>> >>> Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to
>> >>> Microsofts
>> >>> name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they
>> >>> got!
>> >>>
>> >>> UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which
>> >>> lets any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop
>> >>> transparency and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D
>> >>> requirements for video games. Microsoft seems to have learned
>> >>> something
>> >>> from the "Vista Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less
>> >>> confusion
>> >>> on what can "run" the OS due out in mid-2009. [via]
>> >>>
>> >>> http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects
>> >>
>>