> [...]perhaps your XP was loaded and not a clean install, as your vista
> was...

Yes, and I did take that into consideration, but I also take that XP is on
SATA and Vista is on IDE.

Again, this is not a "scientific" benchmark so I only used the word
"noticeably" which is based on my "eyes".




"MicroFox" <-> wrote in message
news:eb2f4q9HHHA.3676@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> >Opening the application and editing image is "noticeably" faster than XP
> >with the same base system.
>
> what???????????
> this is not true sorry
>
> perhaps your XP was loaded and not a clean install, as your vista was...
>
> speed of most applications is degraded in vista.. and I have tried
> photoshop too.
>
>
> "xfile" <cou-cou@remove.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:ePARVn9HHHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> Hi
>>
>> Don't know CS3 but CS2 works perfectly in Vista - the only application I
>> tested in Vista RC1.
>>
>> Opening the application and editing image is "noticeably" faster than XP
>> with the same base system.
>>
>> So I'll assume CS 3 will even better - of course, better than Expression.
>>
>> Hope this helps.
>>
>> "deebs" <deebs@false.false> wrote in message
>> news:%23Lsz3d9HHHA.816@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>I know, I can't quite believe it either.
>>>
>>> It seems the beta is in Vista, XP and OS X flavours
>>>
>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2006/12...ncing_the.html
>>>
>>> http://www.jnack.com/PSCS3_FAQ.pdf
>>>
>>
>>
>
>